You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2006/06/09 19:53:13 UTC
[Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.3 (and its dependencies:
MyFaces Shared 2.0.2 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.3.)
+1 for my vote
--
Matthias Wessendorf
Aechterhoek 18
48282 Emsdetten
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: [Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Patch has been applied to the trunk so it should be in the next
snapshot (and next release.)
Sean
On 6/13/06, Dan Allen <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/12/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > There seems to be a workaround and we're pretty far into the process
> > to turn back now.
> >
>
> There isn't a workaround for the expression resolving in the row-level
> attributes, but if you say it is too far in the release, then so be
> it. As long as the patch makes it into some version, I can be patient
> to use that release.
>
> /dan
>
Re: [Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
Posted by Dan Allen <da...@gmail.com>.
On 6/12/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There seems to be a workaround and we're pretty far into the process
> to turn back now.
>
There isn't a workaround for the expression resolving in the row-level
attributes, but if you say it is too far in the release, then so be
it. As long as the patch makes it into some version, I can be patient
to use that release.
/dan
Re: [Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
There seems to be a workaround and we're pretty far into the process
to turn back now.
Sean
On 6/11/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What about Dan's patch? Will we apply that?
>
> I think it would be bad to give out a table which starts rendering on the
> second row only ;)
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> On 6/11/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > sure! this nice guy worked for me!
> > that is one of the first things I test.
> > since users (and I) like it very very much
> >
> > works w/ RI (1.1_01) and MyFaces (of course)
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > On 6/10/06, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yes. Does it not work for you?
> > >
> > > Sean
> > >
> > > On 6/10/06, Bruno Aranda < brunoaranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Does the tree2 work for you?
> > > >
> > > > On 6/9/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.3 (and its dependencies:
> > > > > MyFaces Shared 2.0.2 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.3.)
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 for my vote
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > Aechterhoek 18
> > 48282 Emsdetten
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: [Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
What about Dan's patch? Will we apply that?
I think it would be bad to give out a table which starts rendering on the
second row only ;)
regards,
Martin
On 6/11/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> sure! this nice guy worked for me!
> that is one of the first things I test.
> since users (and I) like it very very much
>
> works w/ RI (1.1_01) and MyFaces (of course)
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 6/10/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes. Does it not work for you?
> >
> > Sean
> >
> > On 6/10/06, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Does the tree2 work for you?
> > >
> > > On 6/9/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.3 (and its dependencies:
> > > > MyFaces Shared 2.0.2 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.3.)
> > > >
> > > > +1 for my vote
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
> Aechterhoek 18
> 48282 Emsdetten
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: [Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
sure! this nice guy worked for me!
that is one of the first things I test.
since users (and I) like it very very much
works w/ RI (1.1_01) and MyFaces (of course)
-Matthias
On 6/10/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. Does it not work for you?
>
> Sean
>
> On 6/10/06, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Does the tree2 work for you?
> >
> > On 6/9/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.3 (and its dependencies:
> > > MyFaces Shared 2.0.2 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.3.)
> > >
> > > +1 for my vote
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
Aechterhoek 18
48282 Emsdetten
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: [Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
Yes, in the tomahawk 1.1.3 it does work for me. I have tried with the
head svn. I will try again later.
When using the JSF-RI, the tree2 only works if commons-lang is
included in the classpath. We are having this issue for some
components in tomahawk...
Bruno
On 6/11/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. Does it not work for you?
>
> Sean
>
> On 6/10/06, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Does the tree2 work for you?
> >
> > On 6/9/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.3 (and its dependencies:
> > > MyFaces Shared 2.0.2 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.3.)
> > >
> > > +1 for my vote
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Yes. Does it not work for you?
Sean
On 6/10/06, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does the tree2 work for you?
>
> On 6/9/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.3 (and its dependencies:
> > MyFaces Shared 2.0.2 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.3.)
> >
> > +1 for my vote
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > Aechterhoek 18
> > 48282 Emsdetten
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
Re: [Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
Does the tree2 work for you?
On 6/9/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.3 (and its dependencies:
> MyFaces Shared 2.0.2 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.3.)
>
> +1 for my vote
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
> Aechterhoek 18
> 48282 Emsdetten
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
Re: [Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
Posted by Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 6/9/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 6/9/06, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> wrote:
> > Jo-o!
> > > This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.3 (and its dependencies:
> > > MyFaces Shared 2.0.2 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.3.)
> > >
> > > +1 for my vote
> > >
> > +1
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Mario
> >
> >
>
--
Grant Smith
Re: [Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 6/9/06, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> wrote:
> Jo-o!
> > This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.3 (and its dependencies:
> > MyFaces Shared 2.0.2 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.3.)
> >
> > +1 for my vote
> >
> +1
>
> Ciao,
> Mario
>
>
Re: [Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
Posted by Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at>.
Jo-o!
> This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.3 (and its dependencies:
> MyFaces Shared 2.0.2 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.3.)
>
> +1 for my vote
>
+1
Ciao,
Mario
Re: [Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Ok Craig,
thanks. Next rc we will take care of that.
-Matthias
On 6/9/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/9/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Craig-
> >
> > thanks for heads up. That particular RC for the Tomahawk 1.1.3 is
> > listed available for download under [1]. That Shared 2.0.2 thing is
> > *no* extra jar to be added to your WEB-INF/lib. The Shared clazzes are
> > included in Tomahawk
> (org.apache.myfaces.shared_tomahawk.**)
> >
> > The folder [1] also contains a pom file for that Tomahawk 1.1.3 RC
>
>
> OK, good ... I see that the proposed bits have indeed been published to a
> special repository for testing, and thereby withdraw my -1. But I still
> recommend a [VOTE] message for a release should specifically include such a
> URL (and perhaps instructions on how to temporarily modify your Maven
> settings to download and test this version) instead of just assuming that
> everyone knows where the bits are, and what to do.
>
>
> > -Matthias
>
>
> Craig
>
>
> > [1] http://tinyurl.com/mu4t9
> >
> > On 6/9/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/9/06, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.3 (and its dependencies:
> > > > MyFaces Shared 2.0.2 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.3.)
> > >
> > >
> > > I should have spoken up earlier on, but I have a problem with this
> approach
> > > to release votes.
> > >
> > > In the Struts world, the release manager tends to put up a particular
> set of
> > > bits in his or her personal directory on people.apache.org, and then
> posts
> > > the vote request as "I propose to release *this set of bits* ..." That
> way,
> > > the other committers can download and check out exactly what is being
> > > proposed.
> > >
> > > Yes, with Maven based builds it is easy to assume that you and I will
> build
> > > identical artifacts, but it is still easier than you think for that not
> to
> > > be the case. Besides that, we caught packaging errors in several of the
> > > recent Struts Action Framework and Shale builds that would not have been
> > > caught if we hadn't been examining the actual bits being proposed.
> > >
> > > I would strongly suggest following this approach in MyFaces as well.
> > >
> > > On this basis, I'm -1 (non-binding as I'm not on the PMC).
> > >
> > > Craig
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > +1 for my vote
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > Aechterhoek 18
> > 48282 Emsdetten
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
Aechterhoek 18
48282 Emsdetten
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: [Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
Posted by Dan Allen <da...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, my example is flawed because I forgot to use one of the
row-level attributes. Please see the bug report for the correct
example:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-485
/dan
On 6/9/06, Dan Allen <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -1, show stopper bug!
>
> It just so happens that today I decided that I would upgrade my
> company's web application to myfaces 1.1.3 and tomahawk 1.1.3 and in
> the process ran into a major bug. I will file this immediately after
> this post in jira, but felt that it was important to mention it on
> this thread so that the developers have an opportunity to take
> appropriate measures.
>
> After the merge of the tomahawk data table with the newspaper table, a
> bug was introduced that causes faulty behavior in the rendering of the
> row-level attributes. The problem stems from the fact that
> setRowIndex() occurs after the renderRowStart() in
> HtmlTableRendererBase. Consequently, all the row-level expressions
> are off by one row, and the first row has no data.
>
> Take the following example and run it to see what I am talking about:
>
> <t:dataTable var="item" value="#{bean.items}" rowIndexVar="index">
> <h:column>
> row index: <h:outputText value="#{index}" />; item: <h:outputText
> value="#{item}" />
> </h:column>
> </t:dataTable>
>
> I built the code today from the tag 1_1_3. Unless this was something
> recently fixed in the trunk, it probably still exists.
>
> /dan
>
> On 6/9/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/9/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Craig-
> > >
> > > thanks for heads up. That particular RC for the Tomahawk 1.1.3 is
> > > listed available for download under [1]. That Shared 2.0.2 thing is
> > > *no* extra jar to be added to your WEB-INF/lib. The Shared clazzes are
> > > included in Tomahawk
> > (org.apache.myfaces.shared_tomahawk.**)
> > >
> > > The folder [1] also contains a pom file for that Tomahawk 1.1.3 RC
> >
> >
> > OK, good ... I see that the proposed bits have indeed been published to a
> > special repository for testing, and thereby withdraw my -1. But I still
> > recommend a [VOTE] message for a release should specifically include such a
> > URL (and perhaps instructions on how to temporarily modify your Maven
> > settings to download and test this version) instead of just assuming that
> > everyone knows where the bits are, and what to do.
> >
> >
> > > -Matthias
> >
> >
> > Craig
> >
> >
> > > [1] http://tinyurl.com/mu4t9
> > >
> > > On 6/9/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 6/9/06, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.3 (and its dependencies:
> > > > > MyFaces Shared 2.0.2 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.3.)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I should have spoken up earlier on, but I have a problem with this
> > approach
> > > > to release votes.
> > > >
> > > > In the Struts world, the release manager tends to put up a particular
> > set of
> > > > bits in his or her personal directory on people.apache.org, and then
> > posts
> > > > the vote request as "I propose to release *this set of bits* ..." That
> > way,
> > > > the other committers can download and check out exactly what is being
> > > > proposed.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, with Maven based builds it is easy to assume that you and I will
> > build
> > > > identical artifacts, but it is still easier than you think for that not
> > to
> > > > be the case. Besides that, we caught packaging errors in several of the
> > > > recent Struts Action Framework and Shale builds that would not have been
> > > > caught if we hadn't been examining the actual bits being proposed.
> > > >
> > > > I would strongly suggest following this approach in MyFaces as well.
> > > >
> > > > On this basis, I'm -1 (non-binding as I'm not on the PMC).
> > > >
> > > > Craig
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for my vote
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Daniel Allen
> Registered Linux User #231597
>
> Mojavelinux.com: Open Source Advocacy
> http://www.mojavelinux.com
>
> While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily basis,
> life and work come first and, at times, keep me away from my mail for a
> while. If you contact me and then don't hear back for more than a week,
> it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
> caught in the filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a message if
> you feel that it did not reach my attention.
>
--
Daniel Allen
Registered Linux User #231597
Mojavelinux.com: Open Source Advocacy
http://www.mojavelinux.com
While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily basis,
life and work come first and, at times, keep me away from my mail for a
while. If you contact me and then don't hear back for more than a week,
it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
caught in the filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a message if
you feel that it did not reach my attention.
Re: [Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
Posted by Dan Allen <da...@gmail.com>.
-1, show stopper bug!
It just so happens that today I decided that I would upgrade my
company's web application to myfaces 1.1.3 and tomahawk 1.1.3 and in
the process ran into a major bug. I will file this immediately after
this post in jira, but felt that it was important to mention it on
this thread so that the developers have an opportunity to take
appropriate measures.
After the merge of the tomahawk data table with the newspaper table, a
bug was introduced that causes faulty behavior in the rendering of the
row-level attributes. The problem stems from the fact that
setRowIndex() occurs after the renderRowStart() in
HtmlTableRendererBase. Consequently, all the row-level expressions
are off by one row, and the first row has no data.
Take the following example and run it to see what I am talking about:
<t:dataTable var="item" value="#{bean.items}" rowIndexVar="index">
<h:column>
row index: <h:outputText value="#{index}" />; item: <h:outputText
value="#{item}" />
</h:column>
</t:dataTable>
I built the code today from the tag 1_1_3. Unless this was something
recently fixed in the trunk, it probably still exists.
/dan
On 6/9/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/9/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Craig-
> >
> > thanks for heads up. That particular RC for the Tomahawk 1.1.3 is
> > listed available for download under [1]. That Shared 2.0.2 thing is
> > *no* extra jar to be added to your WEB-INF/lib. The Shared clazzes are
> > included in Tomahawk
> (org.apache.myfaces.shared_tomahawk.**)
> >
> > The folder [1] also contains a pom file for that Tomahawk 1.1.3 RC
>
>
> OK, good ... I see that the proposed bits have indeed been published to a
> special repository for testing, and thereby withdraw my -1. But I still
> recommend a [VOTE] message for a release should specifically include such a
> URL (and perhaps instructions on how to temporarily modify your Maven
> settings to download and test this version) instead of just assuming that
> everyone knows where the bits are, and what to do.
>
>
> > -Matthias
>
>
> Craig
>
>
> > [1] http://tinyurl.com/mu4t9
> >
> > On 6/9/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/9/06, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.3 (and its dependencies:
> > > > MyFaces Shared 2.0.2 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.3.)
> > >
> > >
> > > I should have spoken up earlier on, but I have a problem with this
> approach
> > > to release votes.
> > >
> > > In the Struts world, the release manager tends to put up a particular
> set of
> > > bits in his or her personal directory on people.apache.org, and then
> posts
> > > the vote request as "I propose to release *this set of bits* ..." That
> way,
> > > the other committers can download and check out exactly what is being
> > > proposed.
> > >
> > > Yes, with Maven based builds it is easy to assume that you and I will
> build
> > > identical artifacts, but it is still easier than you think for that not
> to
> > > be the case. Besides that, we caught packaging errors in several of the
> > > recent Struts Action Framework and Shale builds that would not have been
> > > caught if we hadn't been examining the actual bits being proposed.
> > >
> > > I would strongly suggest following this approach in MyFaces as well.
> > >
> > > On this basis, I'm -1 (non-binding as I'm not on the PMC).
> > >
> > > Craig
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > +1 for my vote
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > Aechterhoek 18
> > 48282 Emsdetten
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
>
--
Daniel Allen
Registered Linux User #231597
Mojavelinux.com: Open Source Advocacy
http://www.mojavelinux.com
While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily basis,
life and work come first and, at times, keep me away from my mail for a
while. If you contact me and then don't hear back for more than a week,
it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
caught in the filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a message if
you feel that it did not reach my attention.
Re: [Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org>.
On 6/9/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Craig-
>
> thanks for heads up. That particular RC for the Tomahawk 1.1.3 is
> listed available for download under [1]. That Shared 2.0.2 thing is
> *no* extra jar to be added to your WEB-INF/lib. The Shared clazzes are
> included in Tomahawk (org.apache.myfaces.shared_tomahawk.**)
>
> The folder [1] also contains a pom file for that Tomahawk 1.1.3 RC
OK, good ... I see that the proposed bits have indeed been published to a
special repository for testing, and thereby withdraw my -1. But I still
recommend a [VOTE] message for a release should specifically include such a
URL (and perhaps instructions on how to temporarily modify your Maven
settings to download and test this version) instead of just assuming that
everyone knows where the bits are, and what to do.
-Matthias
Craig
[1] http://tinyurl.com/mu4t9
>
> On 6/9/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/9/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.3 (and its dependencies:
> > > MyFaces Shared 2.0.2 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.3.)
> >
> >
> > I should have spoken up earlier on, but I have a problem with this
> approach
> > to release votes.
> >
> > In the Struts world, the release manager tends to put up a particular
> set of
> > bits in his or her personal directory on people.apache.org, and then
> posts
> > the vote request as "I propose to release *this set of bits* ..." That
> way,
> > the other committers can download and check out exactly what is being
> > proposed.
> >
> > Yes, with Maven based builds it is easy to assume that you and I will
> build
> > identical artifacts, but it is still easier than you think for that not
> to
> > be the case. Besides that, we caught packaging errors in several of the
> > recent Struts Action Framework and Shale builds that would not have been
> > caught if we hadn't been examining the actual bits being proposed.
> >
> > I would strongly suggest following this approach in MyFaces as well.
> >
> > On this basis, I'm -1 (non-binding as I'm not on the PMC).
> >
> > Craig
> >
> >
> >
> > > +1 for my vote
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
> Aechterhoek 18
> 48282 Emsdetten
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
Re: [Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Craig-
thanks for heads up. That particular RC for the Tomahawk 1.1.3 is
listed available for download under [1]. That Shared 2.0.2 thing is
*no* extra jar to be added to your WEB-INF/lib. The Shared clazzes are
included in Tomahawk (org.apache.myfaces.shared_tomahawk.**)
The folder [1] also contains a pom file for that Tomahawk 1.1.3 RC
-Matthias
[1] http://tinyurl.com/mu4t9
On 6/9/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/9/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.3 (and its dependencies:
> > MyFaces Shared 2.0.2 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.3.)
>
>
> I should have spoken up earlier on, but I have a problem with this approach
> to release votes.
>
> In the Struts world, the release manager tends to put up a particular set of
> bits in his or her personal directory on people.apache.org, and then posts
> the vote request as "I propose to release *this set of bits* ..." That way,
> the other committers can download and check out exactly what is being
> proposed.
>
> Yes, with Maven based builds it is easy to assume that you and I will build
> identical artifacts, but it is still easier than you think for that not to
> be the case. Besides that, we caught packaging errors in several of the
> recent Struts Action Framework and Shale builds that would not have been
> caught if we hadn't been examining the actual bits being proposed.
>
> I would strongly suggest following this approach in MyFaces as well.
>
> On this basis, I'm -1 (non-binding as I'm not on the PMC).
>
> Craig
>
>
>
> > +1 for my vote
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > Aechterhoek 18
> > 48282 Emsdetten
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
Aechterhoek 18
48282 Emsdetten
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: [Vote] Release Tomahawk 1.1.3
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org>.
On 6/9/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.3 (and its dependencies:
> MyFaces Shared 2.0.2 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.3.)
I should have spoken up earlier on, but I have a problem with this approach
to release votes.
In the Struts world, the release manager tends to put up a particular set of
bits in his or her personal directory on people.apache.org, and then posts
the vote request as "I propose to release *this set of bits* ..." That way,
the other committers can download and check out exactly what is being
proposed.
Yes, with Maven based builds it is easy to assume that you and I will build
identical artifacts, but it is still easier than you think for that not to
be the case. Besides that, we caught packaging errors in several of the
recent Struts Action Framework and Shale builds that would not have been
caught if we hadn't been examining the actual bits being proposed.
I would strongly suggest following this approach in MyFaces as well.
On this basis, I'm -1 (non-binding as I'm not on the PMC).
Craig
+1 for my vote
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
> Aechterhoek 18
> 48282 Emsdetten
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>