You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@ignite.apache.org by "wmz7year (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/11/16 03:41:10 UTC

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-1916) SpringResource annotation support resourceClass

wmz7year created IGNITE-1916:
--------------------------------

             Summary: SpringResource annotation support resourceClass
                 Key: IGNITE-1916
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1916
             Project: Ignite
          Issue Type: New Feature
          Components: newbie
    Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
            Reporter: wmz7year
            Assignee: wmz7year


@SpringResource support resourceClass

example:
@SpringResource(resourceName = "otherService")

@SpringResource(resourceClass = OtherService.class)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Re: [jira] [Created] (IGNITE-1916) SpringResource annotation support resourceClass

Posted by Denis Magda <dm...@gridgain.com>.

Hi,

Is there any sense to extend @SpringResource annotation the way you suggest?
Isn’t resourceName enough to cover all the use cases?

Regards,
Denis

> On 16 нояб. 2015 г., at 5:41, wmz7year (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> wmz7year created IGNITE-1916:
> --------------------------------
> 
>             Summary: SpringResource annotation support resourceClass
>                 Key: IGNITE-1916
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1916
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: newbie
>    Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>            Reporter: wmz7year
>            Assignee: wmz7year
> 
> 
> @SpringResource support resourceClass
> 
> example:
> @SpringResource(resourceName = "otherService")
> 
> @SpringResource(resourceClass = OtherService.class)
> 
> 
> 
> --
> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
> (v6.3.4#6332)