You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ratis.apache.org by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> on 2022/11/01 03:48:24 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 2.4.1
Let's start to roll thirdparty 1.0.3 and ratis 2.4.1 releases. Does anyone
like to be the release manager?
Tsz-Wo
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 10:58 PM Yaolong Liu <ly...@163.com> wrote:
> Hi William,
>
>
> Thanks for starting a discussion on 2.4.1! +1 on rolling a 2.4.1 release.
>
>
> -Yaolong
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 2022-10-25 19:20:32, "William Song" <sz...@163.com> wrote:
> >Hi Ratis Community,
> >
> >It’s really great to see Ratis releases 2.4.0. Unfortunately, there are
> some important fixes missing in 2.4.0, like RATIS-1708 and RATIS-1729.
> >
> >I would like to propose a new Ratis release 2.4.1 (including
> ratis-thirdparty 1.0.3) with the above changes. Since Apache IoTDB 1.0
> release (frozen by 11.15) is waiting for Ratis, we would be really
> appreciate if the 2.4.1 be released in the coming weeks.
> >
> >Please help me check if there are other commits missing in 2.4.0. Thanks
> in advance!
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >William
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 2.4.1
Posted by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>.
Hi Maksim,
Thanks a lot for using Apache Ratis and Ozone!
Unfortunately, the Apache policy requires committers to serve as a release
manager; sorry about that.
- https://infra.apache.org/release-publishing.html#releasemanager
Tsz-Wo
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 11:59 AM Maksim Myskov <ma...@myskov.name> wrote:
> Hi Apache Ratis devs,
>
> I actively use Apache Ozone and Ratis in my work, so highly interested in
> the development of these two projects.
> I’m not an official apache committer (I don’t have account on id.apche.org).
> If possible, I would love to be a release manager this time.
>
> > On 1 Nov 2022, at 07:48, Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Let's start to roll thirdparty 1.0.3 and ratis 2.4.1 releases. Does
> anyone
> > like to be the release manager?
> >
> > Tsz-Wo
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 10:58 PM Yaolong Liu <ly...@163.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi William,
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for starting a discussion on 2.4.1! +1 on rolling a 2.4.1
> release.
> >>
> >>
> >> -Yaolong
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> At 2022-10-25 19:20:32, "William Song" <sz...@163.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi Ratis Community,
> >>>
> >>> It’s really great to see Ratis releases 2.4.0. Unfortunately, there are
> >> some important fixes missing in 2.4.0, like RATIS-1708 and RATIS-1729.
> >>>
> >>> I would like to propose a new Ratis release 2.4.1 (including
> >> ratis-thirdparty 1.0.3) with the above changes. Since Apache IoTDB 1.0
> >> release (frozen by 11.15) is waiting for Ratis, we would be really
> >> appreciate if the 2.4.1 be released in the coming weeks.
> >>>
> >>> Please help me check if there are other commits missing in 2.4.0.
> Thanks
> >> in advance!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> William
> >>
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 2.4.1
Posted by Maksim Myskov <ma...@myskov.name>.
Hi Apache Ratis devs,
I actively use Apache Ozone and Ratis in my work, so highly interested in the development of these two projects.
I’m not an official apache committer (I don’t have account on id.apche.org). If possible, I would love to be a release manager this time.
> On 1 Nov 2022, at 07:48, Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Let's start to roll thirdparty 1.0.3 and ratis 2.4.1 releases. Does anyone
> like to be the release manager?
>
> Tsz-Wo
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 10:58 PM Yaolong Liu <ly...@163.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi William,
>>
>>
>> Thanks for starting a discussion on 2.4.1! +1 on rolling a 2.4.1 release.
>>
>>
>> -Yaolong
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> At 2022-10-25 19:20:32, "William Song" <sz...@163.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Ratis Community,
>>>
>>> It’s really great to see Ratis releases 2.4.0. Unfortunately, there are
>> some important fixes missing in 2.4.0, like RATIS-1708 and RATIS-1729.
>>>
>>> I would like to propose a new Ratis release 2.4.1 (including
>> ratis-thirdparty 1.0.3) with the above changes. Since Apache IoTDB 1.0
>> release (frozen by 11.15) is waiting for Ratis, we would be really
>> appreciate if the 2.4.1 be released in the coming weeks.
>>>
>>> Please help me check if there are other commits missing in 2.4.0. Thanks
>> in advance!
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> William
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 2.4.1
Posted by William Song <sz...@163.com>.
Thanks for Yaolong and Tsz-Wo for working on 2.4.1! I checked Jira and git commits again and everything looks great. We can start launching the release.
Thank you again on behalf of IoTDB community. Hope all the best!
Warm Regards,
William
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 2.4.1
Posted by Yaolong Liu <ly...@163.com>.
Thanks a lot to Tsz-Wo for helping create branch-2_tmp branch, already refer to it and cherry-pick part of pull request to branch-2.
All JIRAs proposed on the mailing list have now been merged into branch-2.
William, could you help check the brnach-2 to see if there are other JIRAs that Iotdb needs. Thank you in advance!
If all goes well, I hope close this discussion and launch a 2.4.1 release tomorrow.
-Yaolong
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 2.4.1
Posted by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>.
Just have compared branch-2 with the master branch. I suggest to merge the
following JIRAs:
RATIS-1340. Discovery of Bash source path is incompatible with CDPATH.
(#772)
RATIS-1727. Rename GrpcConfigKeys hearbeatChannel 'useCached' to
'useSeparate' (#767)
RATIS-1157. Buffer packets when the size of packets are too small. (#748)
RATIS-1725. Update github actions for node16 (#764)
RATIS-1714. Support unordered async read. (#755)
RATIS-1651. Fix NP_NULL_PARAM_DEREF in GrpcServerProtocolService (#761)
RATIS-1658. Prepare unit check for running some tests repeatedly (#704)
RATIS-1647. Fix EI_EXPOSE_REP in DataStreamRequest implementations (#716)
RATIS-1698. Add unit-test of listener related to leaderElection (#737)
RATIS-1702. Make listener reject leader election (#739)
Some of them have minor conflicts. The others can be merged cleanly.
See https://github.com/apache/ratis/commits/branch-2_tmp
Tsz-Wo
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 5:05 AM William Song <sz...@163.com> wrote:
> Thanks Yaolong for working on release 2.4.1! Also thanks Tsz-Wo for
> rolling and checking issues!
>
> Besides RATIS-1708 / RATIS-1726 / RATIS-1729 / RATIS-1730, I think we
> should also include
> RATIS-1717, it is an improvement on heap memory usage of young-gen.
>
> Also, it would be great if we can include RATIS-1734. 1734 allows state
> machine to decide its snapshot install path. It is WIP, and I will submit a
> PR soon. What do you think?
>
> Thanks again for the release!
>
> Regards,
> William
>
>
>
> > 2022年11月2日 13:15，Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> 写道：
> >
> > Hi Yaolong,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for volunteering to do the release! Let's also
> > include RATIS-1730. I am at the airport waiting for a flight. Will go
> > through the JIRA list in the master branch to see if there are any bug
> > fixes we should include. In the meantime, we may start rolling
> thirdparty
> > 1.0.3.
> >
> > William, please see if there are any JIRAs IoTDB would like to include.
> > Thank you in advance.
> >
> > Tsz-Wo
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 7:10 PM Yaolong Liu <ly...@163.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Tsz-Wo,
> >>
> >>
> >> Let me be the release manager and help with the release of ratis 2.4.1
> and
> >> thirdparty 1.0.3.
> >>
> >>
> >> BTW, compared to 2.4.0, we need add RATIS-1708 and RATIS-1726 in 2.4.1,
> >> are there any other pull requests?
> >>
> >>
> >> - Yaolong
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> At 2022-11-01 11:48:24, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Let's start to roll thirdparty 1.0.3 and ratis 2.4.1 releases. Does
> >> anyone
> >>> like to be the release manager?
> >>>
> >>> Tsz-Wo
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 2.4.1
Posted by William Song <sz...@163.com>.
Thanks Yaolong for working on release 2.4.1! Also thanks Tsz-Wo for rolling and checking issues!
Besides RATIS-1708 / RATIS-1726 / RATIS-1729 / RATIS-1730, I think we should also include
RATIS-1717, it is an improvement on heap memory usage of young-gen.
Also, it would be great if we can include RATIS-1734. 1734 allows state machine to decide its snapshot install path. It is WIP, and I will submit a PR soon. What do you think?
Thanks again for the release!
Regards,
William
> 2022年11月2日 13:15，Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> Hi Yaolong,
>
> Thanks a lot for volunteering to do the release! Let's also
> include RATIS-1730. I am at the airport waiting for a flight. Will go
> through the JIRA list in the master branch to see if there are any bug
> fixes we should include. In the meantime, we may start rolling thirdparty
> 1.0.3.
>
> William, please see if there are any JIRAs IoTDB would like to include.
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Tsz-Wo
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 7:10 PM Yaolong Liu <ly...@163.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tsz-Wo,
>>
>>
>> Let me be the release manager and help with the release of ratis 2.4.1 and
>> thirdparty 1.0.3.
>>
>>
>> BTW, compared to 2.4.0, we need add RATIS-1708 and RATIS-1726 in 2.4.1,
>> are there any other pull requests?
>>
>>
>> - Yaolong
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> At 2022-11-01 11:48:24, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Let's start to roll thirdparty 1.0.3 and ratis 2.4.1 releases. Does
>> anyone
>>> like to be the release manager?
>>>
>>> Tsz-Wo
>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 2.4.1
Posted by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>.
Hi Yaolong,
Thanks a lot for volunteering to do the release! Let's also
include RATIS-1730. I am at the airport waiting for a flight. Will go
through the JIRA list in the master branch to see if there are any bug
fixes we should include. In the meantime, we may start rolling thirdparty
1.0.3.
William, please see if there are any JIRAs IoTDB would like to include.
Thank you in advance.
Tsz-Wo
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 7:10 PM Yaolong Liu <ly...@163.com> wrote:
> Hi Tsz-Wo,
>
>
> Let me be the release manager and help with the release of ratis 2.4.1 and
> thirdparty 1.0.3.
>
>
> BTW, compared to 2.4.0, we need add RATIS-1708 and RATIS-1726 in 2.4.1,
> are there any other pull requests?
>
>
> - Yaolong
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 2022-11-01 11:48:24, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Let's start to roll thirdparty 1.0.3 and ratis 2.4.1 releases. Does
> anyone
> >like to be the release manager?
> >
> >Tsz-Wo
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release 2.4.1
Posted by Yaolong Liu <ly...@163.com>.
Hi Tsz-Wo,
Let me be the release manager and help with the release of ratis 2.4.1 and thirdparty 1.0.3.
BTW, compared to 2.4.0, we need add RATIS-1708 and RATIS-1726 in 2.4.1, are there any other pull requests?
- Yaolong
At 2022-11-01 11:48:24, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Let's start to roll thirdparty 1.0.3 and ratis 2.4.1 releases. Does anyone
>like to be the release manager?
>
>Tsz-Wo
>