You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to common-dev@hadoop.apache.org by "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/05/01 00:14:55 UTC

[jira] Updated: (HADOOP-3317) add default port for hdfs namenode

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-3317:
---------------------------------

    Attachment: HADOOP-3317.patch

Here's an implementation of this, using the default port of 8020.

Is 8020 a good default port for namenodes?  That's what's used within Y!, but http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers shows it assigned to some Intuit protocol.  Do we care?

> add default port for hdfs namenode
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-3317
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3317
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: dfs
>            Reporter: Doug Cutting
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HADOOP-3317.patch
>
>
> Perhaps we should add a default port number for the HDFS namenode.  This would simplify URIs.  Instead of hdfs://host.net:9999/foo/bar folks would be able to just use hdfs://host.net/foo/bar in most cases.  Thoughts?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.