You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Pavel Pervov <pm...@gmail.com> on 2008/06/01 20:28:59 UTC
Re: svn commit: r662020 [1/4] - in /harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm: em/src/ gc_gen/src/common/ gc_gen/src/finalizer_weakref/ gc_gen/src/gen/ gc_gen/src/jni/ gc_gen/src/los/ gc_gen/src/mark_compact/ gc_gen/src/mark_sweep/ gc_gen/src/semi_space/ gc_g
Nathan,
I was half way to fix assertion in gc_gen. Then blocker showed up
related to SPECjvm2008. I just decided to postpone fixing the issue
allowing guys working with SPECs to do evaluation of performance
related JIRAs.
I'll get back to this type change as soon as (and if) I'll be able to
get SPECjvm2008.
WBR,
Pavel.
On 5/31/08, Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> I don't understand the log message on this commit. You don't need the
> specjvm test to recreate the issue - just run the 'smoke.test' on drlvm. On
> windows aboug a third of the tests fail.
>
> Did the 'smoke.test' pass when you had these changes in your working copy?
> What platform are you working on?
>
> -Nathan
Re: svn commit: r662020 [1/4] - in /harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm: em/src/ gc_gen/src/common/ gc_gen/src/finalizer_weakref/ gc_gen/src/gen/ gc_gen/src/jni/ gc_gen/src/los/ gc_gen/src/mark_compact/ gc_gen/src/mark_sweep/ gc_gen/src/semi_space/ gc_g
Posted by Nathan Beyer <nb...@gmail.com>.
I'm still curious though, did the "smoke.test" work for you before commit?
-Nathan
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Pavel Pervov <pm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nathan,
>
> I was half way to fix assertion in gc_gen. Then blocker showed up
> related to SPECjvm2008. I just decided to postpone fixing the issue
> allowing guys working with SPECs to do evaluation of performance
> related JIRAs.
>
> I'll get back to this type change as soon as (and if) I'll be able to
> get SPECjvm2008.
>
> WBR,
> Pavel.
>
> On 5/31/08, Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I don't understand the log message on this commit. You don't need the
> > specjvm test to recreate the issue - just run the 'smoke.test' on drlvm.
> On
> > windows aboug a third of the tests fail.
> >
> > Did the 'smoke.test' pass when you had these changes in your working
> copy?
> > What platform are you working on?
> >
> > -Nathan
>