[jira] [Resolved] (ARROW-10484) [C++] Future<{void,Status}> could be more generic

["Ben Kietzman (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-10484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Ben Kietzman resolved ARROW-10484.
----------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

Issue resolved by pull request 8591
[https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8591]

> [C++] Future<{void,Status}> could be more generic
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-10484
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-10484
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: C++
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Ben Kietzman
>            Assignee: Ben Kietzman
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>          Time Spent: 2h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The members of {{Future<{void,Status}>}} differ from other instantiations of {{Future<>}} since they contain only a Status and not a value. This is reasonable, however it complicates generic usage of {{Future<>}} since special cases must be added for the different interfaces. IMHO it'd be acceptable to provide an empty "ValueType" (or maybe {{std::nullptr_t}} to follow the precedent of Datum's default state) for those specializations to keep the interface generic.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)