You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/11/13 18:51:11 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2441) [py] Introduce an OpInfo object on the python side

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15004373#comment-15004373 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2441:
---------------------------------------

GitHub user zentol opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1352

    [FLINK-2441] Introduce Python OperationInfo

    Introduces an OperationInfo object to the Python API, replacing the previously used dictionary. 
    
    This is mostly a cosmetic change, making code shorter (and IMO more readable) within DataSet and ExecutionEnvironment and making the general structure more similar to the Java side. 
    
    Furthermore all fields are initialized with a default value.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/zentol/flink 2441_pyopinfo

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1352.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #1352
    
----
commit ce23a695355db363c96eeec5c639b0597f802f96
Author: zentol <s....@web.de>
Date:   2015-07-24T18:18:47Z

    [FLINK-2441] Introduce Python OperationInfo
    
    Introduces an OperationInfo object, replacing the previously used dictionary. This change generally makes related code shorter.

----


> [py] Introduce an OpInfo object on the python side
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-2441
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2441
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Python API
>            Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
>            Assignee: Chesnay Schepler
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> All information required to construct on operation are currently saved in a plain dictionary on the python side, whose fields are generally accessed using a variety of string constants.
> so right now you find lines like: 
> {code}
> op_info[_Fields.KEYS] = keys
> {code}
> The following shortcomings exist in the current system:
> # There is no central place to define default values. This is done all over the place, to some extent in a redundant way,
> # It produces fairly long code,
> # is surprisingly cumbersome to write.
> Instead i would like to add a separate OperationInfo object. This code be a special dictionary with preset values for each field, but due to points 2 and 3, Id prefer having an attribute for every field. the resulting code would look like this:
> {code}
> op_info.keys = keys
> {code}
> isn't that lovely.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)