You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@netbeans.apache.org by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com> on 2017/11/07 10:17:58 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
this version.
Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
Platform.
Build artifacts:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/
Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
The artifact to be voted on:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
the NetBeans Platform:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
files.
Please try out the package and vote!
The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
NetBeans committer.
Geertjan
on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Junichi Yamamoto <ju...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Junichi
2017-11-07 19:17 GMT+09:00 Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
> this version.
>
> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> Platform.
>
> Build artifacts:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/
>
> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>
> The artifact to be voted on:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
>
> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
>
> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> the NetBeans Platform:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
>
> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
> files.
>
> Please try out the package and vote!
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> NetBeans committer.
>
> Geertjan
> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Ludovic HOCHET <lh...@gmail.com>.
+ 1
built from source and tryme went fine.
On 7 November 2017 at 11:17, Geertjan Wielenga
<ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
> this version.
>
> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> Platform.
>
> Build artifacts:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/
>
> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>
> The artifact to be voted on:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
>
> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
>
> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> the NetBeans Platform:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
>
> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
> files.
>
> Please try out the package and vote!
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> NetBeans committer.
>
> Geertjan
> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
--
Ludovic
-----------------------------------------
"Les formes qui differencient les etres importent peu
si leur pensees s'unissent pour batir un univers..."
Yoko Tsuno (in 'Les titans' by Roger Leloup)
[The shapes that differenciate beings are not important
if their thoughts unite to build a universe]
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Leonardo Loch Zanivan <le...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
--
Atenciosamente,
Leonardo Loch Zanivan
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
> this version.
>
> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> Platform.
>
> Build artifacts:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/
>
> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>
> The artifact to be voted on:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
>
> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
>
> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> the NetBeans Platform:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
>
> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
> files.
>
> Please try out the package and vote!
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> NetBeans committer.
>
> Geertjan
> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Reema Taneja <re...@oracle.com>.
+1
Thanks,
Reema
On 11/7/2017 3:47 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
> this version.
>
> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> Platform.
>
> Build artifacts:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=I_-Y15BecdUmuYLJbvbi0hFUs7JgHZnV_jPFSP8DQF0&m=SEaSJIvZ_bJDtJCBAFwwqpmU9CuReN7CcqESjrypigY&s=ACaA2QnpEkuNmFdE20rF1NE-p8sqD1YkI3kdz1M5nSA&e=
>
> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>
> The artifact to be voted on:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-2Dsource-2D.zip&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=I_-Y15BecdUmuYLJbvbi0hFUs7JgHZnV_jPFSP8DQF0&m=SEaSJIvZ_bJDtJCBAFwwqpmU9CuReN7CcqESjrypigY&s=WgJa6QVmN_qzNNUEsmb8wiMTb-N1ToYQb5cCOq67N68&e=
>
> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_rat-2Dtemp_nbbuild_build_rat-2Dreport.txt&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=I_-Y15BecdUmuYLJbvbi0hFUs7JgHZnV_jPFSP8DQF0&m=SEaSJIvZ_bJDtJCBAFwwqpmU9CuReN7CcqESjrypigY&s=c7h2H2h9BlKcxpg1Mk8TwzSKI1_LLtUURlxS1toysPw&e=
>
> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> the NetBeans Platform:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-2Dbin-2D.zip&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=I_-Y15BecdUmuYLJbvbi0hFUs7JgHZnV_jPFSP8DQF0&m=SEaSJIvZ_bJDtJCBAFwwqpmU9CuReN7CcqESjrypigY&s=xzl73pVmYCIE7wTG_iV-w0yL9uQPVytvU_HU8TUf6BU&e=
>
> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
> files.
>
> Please try out the package and vote!
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> NetBeans committer.
>
> Geertjan
> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Hamon Arnaud <ha...@gmail.com>.
+1
(occasionnal NetCat participant)
Arnaud
2017-11-07 14:21 GMT+01:00 Lars Bruun-Hansen <lb...@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
> Remark: NOTICE file looks as if it could use some more line breaks. JUnit
> notice is duplicated. Perhaps NOTICE file was handcrafted for this release?
>
> Lars
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Sven Reimers <sv...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Sven
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Josh Juneau <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 on the release.
> > >
> > > Josh Juneau
> > > juneau001@gmail.com
> > > http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> > > https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
> > > geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If
> > this
> > > > voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> > > > general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
> > > release
> > > > this version.
> > > >
> > > > Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache
> > NetBeans
> > > > that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the
> > NetBeans
> > > > Platform.
> > > >
> > > > Build artifacts:
> > > >
> > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > > > incubator-netbeans-release/
> > > >
> > > > Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
> > > >
> > > > The artifact to be voted on:
> > > >
> > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > > > incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> > > > dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
> > > >
> > > > Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
> > > >
> > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > > > incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> > > > rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
> > > >
> > > > Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll
> > see
> > > > the NetBeans Platform:
> > > >
> > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > > > incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> > > > dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
> > > >
> > > > Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and
> > > NOTICE
> > > > files.
> > > >
> > > > Please try out the package and vote!
> > > >
> > > > The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary
> > number
> > > of
> > > > votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> > > > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > >
> > > > Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an
> Apache
> > > > NetBeans committer.
> > > >
> > > > Geertjan
> > > > on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sven Reimers
> >
> > * Senior Expert Software Architect
> > * Java Champion
> > * NetBeans Dream Team Member: http://dreamteam.netbeans.org
> > * Community Leader NetBeans: http://community.java.net/netbeans
> > Desktop Java:
> > http://community.java.net/javadesktop
> > * JUG Leader JUG Bodensee: http://www.jug-bodensee.de
> > * Duke's Choice Award Winner 2009
> >
> > * XING: https://www.xing.com/profile/Sven_Reimers8
> > * LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/svenreimers
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Lars Bruun-Hansen <lb...@gmail.com>.
+1
Remark: NOTICE file looks as if it could use some more line breaks. JUnit
notice is duplicated. Perhaps NOTICE file was handcrafted for this release?
Lars
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Sven Reimers <sv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Sven
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Josh Juneau <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 on the release.
> >
> > Josh Juneau
> > juneau001@gmail.com
> > http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> > https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
> > geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If
> this
> > > voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> > > general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
> > release
> > > this version.
> > >
> > > Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache
> NetBeans
> > > that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the
> NetBeans
> > > Platform.
> > >
> > > Build artifacts:
> > >
> > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > > incubator-netbeans-release/
> > >
> > > Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
> > >
> > > The artifact to be voted on:
> > >
> > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > > incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> > > dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
> > >
> > > Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
> > >
> > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > > incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> > > rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
> > >
> > > Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll
> see
> > > the NetBeans Platform:
> > >
> > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > > incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> > > dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
> > >
> > > Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and
> > NOTICE
> > > files.
> > >
> > > Please try out the package and vote!
> > >
> > > The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary
> number
> > of
> > > votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> > > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >
> > > Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> > > NetBeans committer.
> > >
> > > Geertjan
> > > on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sven Reimers
>
> * Senior Expert Software Architect
> * Java Champion
> * NetBeans Dream Team Member: http://dreamteam.netbeans.org
> * Community Leader NetBeans: http://community.java.net/netbeans
> Desktop Java:
> http://community.java.net/javadesktop
> * JUG Leader JUG Bodensee: http://www.jug-bodensee.de
> * Duke's Choice Award Winner 2009
>
> * XING: https://www.xing.com/profile/Sven_Reimers8
> * LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/svenreimers
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Sven Reimers <sv...@gmail.com>.
+1
Sven
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Josh Juneau <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 on the release.
>
> Josh Juneau
> juneau001@gmail.com
> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
> geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> > voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> > general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
> release
> > this version.
> >
> > Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> > that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> > Platform.
> >
> > Build artifacts:
> >
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > incubator-netbeans-release/
> >
> > Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
> >
> > The artifact to be voted on:
> >
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> > dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
> >
> > Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
> >
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> > rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
> >
> > Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> > the NetBeans Platform:
> >
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> > dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
> >
> > Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and
> NOTICE
> > files.
> >
> > Please try out the package and vote!
> >
> > The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of
> > votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> > NetBeans committer.
> >
> > Geertjan
> > on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
> >
>
--
Sven Reimers
* Senior Expert Software Architect
* Java Champion
* NetBeans Dream Team Member: http://dreamteam.netbeans.org
* Community Leader NetBeans: http://community.java.net/netbeans
Desktop Java:
http://community.java.net/javadesktop
* JUG Leader JUG Bodensee: http://www.jug-bodensee.de
* Duke's Choice Award Winner 2009
* XING: https://www.xing.com/profile/Sven_Reimers8
* LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/svenreimers
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Josh Juneau <ju...@gmail.com>.
+1 on the release.
Josh Juneau
juneau001@gmail.com
http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
> this version.
>
> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> Platform.
>
> Build artifacts:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/
>
> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>
> The artifact to be voted on:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
>
> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
>
> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> the NetBeans Platform:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
>
> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
> files.
>
> Please try out the package and vote!
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> NetBeans committer.
>
> Geertjan
> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>
AW: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net>.
+1 do it.
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: Vikas Prabhakar
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. November 2017 13:17
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
+1 Please release the package.
On 11/7/2017 3:47 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
> this version.
>
> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> Platform.
>
> Build artifacts:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=EZDuW-ID1Fy7tDK-QRP9H47sL3yOMJhYItFMRUIr604&m=sbpXzfYcFUr0Jz5iu37jothhdLJ_1GXejEahWyIkEP8&s=0GeyHQgP0_7m53e1Lc-nBsKbeFM28s15xvgsj4_9O_Y&e=
>
> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>
> The artifact to be voted on:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-2Dsource-2D.zip&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=EZDuW-ID1Fy7tDK-QRP9H47sL3yOMJhYItFMRUIr604&m=sbpXzfYcFUr0Jz5iu37jothhdLJ_1GXejEahWyIkEP8&s=gJUHVKPgIjbPgClJFY2jvxspATHHMpOFOmctFEPpx_Y&e=
>
> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_rat-2Dtemp_nbbuild_build_rat-2Dreport.txt&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=EZDuW-ID1Fy7tDK-QRP9H47sL3yOMJhYItFMRUIr604&m=sbpXzfYcFUr0Jz5iu37jothhdLJ_1GXejEahWyIkEP8&s=fuU-AEsMaAw2GBx8wQN9Rcr6M5LzArdD7y1PSW9qqHU&e=
>
> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> the NetBeans Platform:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-2Dbin-2D.zip&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=EZDuW-ID1Fy7tDK-QRP9H47sL3yOMJhYItFMRUIr604&m=sbpXzfYcFUr0Jz5iu37jothhdLJ_1GXejEahWyIkEP8&s=eCujRpgrEuabLcv85ODckZdRE7m5yM4wd2yECojWzS4&e=
>
> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
> files.
>
> Please try out the package and vote!
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> NetBeans committer.
>
> Geertjan
> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Vikas Prabhakar <vi...@oracle.com>.
+1 Please release the package.
On 11/7/2017 3:47 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
> this version.
>
> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> Platform.
>
> Build artifacts:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=EZDuW-ID1Fy7tDK-QRP9H47sL3yOMJhYItFMRUIr604&m=sbpXzfYcFUr0Jz5iu37jothhdLJ_1GXejEahWyIkEP8&s=0GeyHQgP0_7m53e1Lc-nBsKbeFM28s15xvgsj4_9O_Y&e=
>
> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>
> The artifact to be voted on:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-2Dsource-2D.zip&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=EZDuW-ID1Fy7tDK-QRP9H47sL3yOMJhYItFMRUIr604&m=sbpXzfYcFUr0Jz5iu37jothhdLJ_1GXejEahWyIkEP8&s=gJUHVKPgIjbPgClJFY2jvxspATHHMpOFOmctFEPpx_Y&e=
>
> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_rat-2Dtemp_nbbuild_build_rat-2Dreport.txt&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=EZDuW-ID1Fy7tDK-QRP9H47sL3yOMJhYItFMRUIr604&m=sbpXzfYcFUr0Jz5iu37jothhdLJ_1GXejEahWyIkEP8&s=fuU-AEsMaAw2GBx8wQN9Rcr6M5LzArdD7y1PSW9qqHU&e=
>
> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> the NetBeans Platform:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-2Dbin-2D.zip&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=EZDuW-ID1Fy7tDK-QRP9H47sL3yOMJhYItFMRUIr604&m=sbpXzfYcFUr0Jz5iu37jothhdLJ_1GXejEahWyIkEP8&s=eCujRpgrEuabLcv85ODckZdRE7m5yM4wd2yECojWzS4&e=
>
> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
> files.
>
> Please try out the package and vote!
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> NetBeans committer.
>
> Geertjan
> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by mark stephens <ma...@idrsolutions.com>.
+1 from me also…..
> On 8 Nov 2017, at 08:19, mario-leander.reimer@qaware.de wrote:
>
> +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by "mario-leander.reimer@qaware.de" <ma...@qaware.de>.
+1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by David Heffelfinger <dh...@gmail.com>.
+1
--
http://ensode.net - A Guide to Java, Linux and Other Technology Topics
My Books: http://www.packtpub.com/authors/profiles/david-heffelfinger
My Video Training:
http://www.packtpub.com/java-ee-development-with-netbeans-7/video
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ensode
On Nov 7, 2017 5:18 AM, "Geertjan Wielenga" <
geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
> this version.
>
> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> Platform.
>
> Build artifacts:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/
>
> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>
> The artifact to be voted on:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
>
> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
>
> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> the NetBeans Platform:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
>
> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
> files.
>
> Please try out the package and vote!
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> NetBeans committer.
>
> Geertjan
> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Andreas Ernst <ae...@ae-online.de>.
+1 (non-binding)
Am 07.11.17 um 11:17 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
> this version.
>
> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> Platform.
>
> Build artifacts:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/
>
> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>
> The artifact to be voted on:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
>
> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
>
> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> the NetBeans Platform:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
>
> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
> files.
>
> Please try out the package and vote!
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> NetBeans committer.
>
> Geertjan
> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>
--
ae | Andreas Ernst | IT Spektrum
Postfach 5, 65612 Beselich
Schupbacher Str. 32, 65614 Beselich, Germany
Tel: +49-6484-91002 Fax: +49-6484-91003
ae@ae-online.de | www.ae-online.de
www.tachyon-online.de
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Eric Barboni <sk...@apache.org>.
Hi,
+1 (non-binding)
Eric
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Geertjan Wielenga [mailto:geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com]
Envoyé : mardi 7 novembre 2017 11:18
À : dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Objet : [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this voting passes, another similar voting will be started on general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release this version.
Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans Platform.
Build artifacts:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/
Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
The artifact to be voted on:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see the NetBeans Platform:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE files.
Please try out the package and vote!
The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache NetBeans committer.
Geertjan
on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Michael Nascimento <mi...@gmail.com>.
I guess it won't affect the signature, so +1 (binding).
Regards,
Michael
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
<ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Good point, I don't know, though it can certainly be done.
>
> Gj
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Michael Nascimento <mi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Geertjan,
>>
>> Shouldn't the artifact names end with 9.0-alpha?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Michael
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
>> <ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
>> > voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
>> > general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
>> release
>> > this version.
>> >
>> > Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
>> > that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
>> > Platform.
>> >
>> > Build artifacts:
>> >
>> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
>> incubator-netbeans-release/
>> >
>> > Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>> >
>> > The artifact to be voted on:
>> >
>> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
>> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
>> dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
>> >
>> > Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>> >
>> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
>> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
>> rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
>> >
>> > Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
>> > the NetBeans Platform:
>> >
>> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
>> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
>> dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
>> >
>> > Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and
>> NOTICE
>> > files.
>> >
>> > Please try out the package and vote!
>> >
>> > The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number
>> of
>> > votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
>> > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> >
>> > Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
>> > NetBeans committer.
>> >
>> > Geertjan
>> > on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>.
Good point, I don't know, though it can certainly be done.
Gj
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Michael Nascimento <mi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Geertjan,
>
> Shouldn't the artifact names end with 9.0-alpha?
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
> <ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> > voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> > general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
> release
> > this version.
> >
> > Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> > that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> > Platform.
> >
> > Build artifacts:
> >
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/
> >
> > Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
> >
> > The artifact to be voted on:
> >
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
> >
> > Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
> >
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
> >
> > Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> > the NetBeans Platform:
> >
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
> >
> > Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and
> NOTICE
> > files.
> >
> > Please try out the package and vote!
> >
> > The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of
> > votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> > NetBeans committer.
> >
> > Geertjan
> > on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Michael Nascimento <mi...@gmail.com>.
Not sure if we need to reset the voting them... In any case, here is
+1 (binding) again.
Regards,
Michael
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Jan Lahoda <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I think that's right. I've re-run the job, specifying the version. The
> updated artefacts are:
> source:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
> MD5: be76c8411180ca21388050843bf7ce5b
>
> Convenience binary:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
> MD5: 11c2a0c50f0ff0dbe79c640e0e385fd7
>
>
> +1 from me on the release.
>
> Jan
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Michael Nascimento <mi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Geertjan,
>>
>> Shouldn't the artifact names end with 9.0-alpha?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Michael
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
>> <ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
>> > voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
>> > general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
>> release
>> > this version.
>> >
>> > Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
>> > that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
>> > Platform.
>> >
>> > Build artifacts:
>> >
>> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
>> incubator-netbeans-release/
>> >
>> > Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>> >
>> > The artifact to be voted on:
>> >
>> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
>> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
>> dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
>> >
>> > Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>> >
>> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
>> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
>> rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
>> >
>> > Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
>> > the NetBeans Platform:
>> >
>> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
>> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
>> dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
>> >
>> > Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and
>> NOTICE
>> > files.
>> >
>> > Please try out the package and vote!
>> >
>> > The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number
>> of
>> > votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
>> > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> >
>> > Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
>> > NetBeans committer.
>> >
>> > Geertjan
>> > on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Timon Veenstra <mo...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Jan Lahoda <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I think that's right. I've re-run the job, specifying the version. The
> updated artefacts are:
> source:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
> MD5: be76c8411180ca21388050843bf7ce5b
>
> Convenience binary:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-bin-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
> MD5: 11c2a0c50f0ff0dbe79c640e0e385fd7
>
>
> +1 from me on the release.
>
> Jan
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Michael Nascimento <mi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Geertjan,
> >
> > Shouldn't the artifact names end with 9.0-alpha?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Michael
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
> > <ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If
> this
> > > voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> > > general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
> > release
> > > this version.
> > >
> > > Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache
> NetBeans
> > > that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the
> NetBeans
> > > Platform.
> > >
> > > Build artifacts:
> > >
> > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > incubator-netbeans-release/
> > >
> > > Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
> > >
> > > The artifact to be voted on:
> > >
> > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> > dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
> > >
> > > Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
> > >
> > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> > rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
> > >
> > > Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll
> see
> > > the NetBeans Platform:
> > >
> > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> > incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> > dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
> > >
> > > Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and
> > NOTICE
> > > files.
> > >
> > > Please try out the package and vote!
> > >
> > > The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary
> number
> > of
> > > votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> > > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >
> > > Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> > > NetBeans committer.
> > >
> > > Geertjan
> > > on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Jan Lahoda <la...@gmail.com>.
Hi Michael,
I think that's right. I've re-run the job, specifying the version. The
updated artefacts are:
source:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
MD5: be76c8411180ca21388050843bf7ce5b
Convenience binary:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
MD5: 11c2a0c50f0ff0dbe79c640e0e385fd7
+1 from me on the release.
Jan
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Michael Nascimento <mi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Geertjan,
>
> Shouldn't the artifact names end with 9.0-alpha?
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
> <ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> > voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> > general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
> release
> > this version.
> >
> > Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> > that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> > Platform.
> >
> > Build artifacts:
> >
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/
> >
> > Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
> >
> > The artifact to be voted on:
> >
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
> >
> > Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
> >
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
> >
> > Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> > the NetBeans Platform:
> >
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
> >
> > Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and
> NOTICE
> > files.
> >
> > Please try out the package and vote!
> >
> > The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of
> > votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> > NetBeans committer.
> >
> > Geertjan
> > on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Michael Nascimento <mi...@gmail.com>.
Geertjan,
Shouldn't the artifact names end with 9.0-alpha?
Regards,
Michael
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
<ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
> this version.
>
> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> Platform.
>
> Build artifacts:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/
>
> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>
> The artifact to be voted on:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
>
> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
>
> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> the NetBeans Platform:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
>
> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
> files.
>
> Please try out the package and vote!
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> NetBeans committer.
>
> Geertjan
> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Antonio Vieiro <an...@vieiro.net>.
-1, until we resolve these issues reported by Ate.
Thanks, Ate, for reporting them,
Antonio
P.S.: I'll have some time tonight (EU time) to help solve them.
2017-11-08 0:04 GMT+01:00 Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>:
> I get a different build error:
>
> BUILD FAILED
> /home/ate/tmp/netbeans/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:122:
> Download of
> 276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC712305A42A-net.java.html.boot.script-1.5.jar
> produced content with hash 5DE9DD70EDCD9B30E0671ACC813F6F0C80E951AA when
> 276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC712305A42A was expected
>
> But disregarding the above, I think a more serious, blocking, issue is
> that AFAICT *not* all platform modules have been reviewed yet.
> I notice this release candidate includes the apisupport.harness module.
> And that still has status "To do". Furthermore, it depends on the *GPL*
> external jsearch-2.0_05.jar which is a no-go... for the ASF.
> See: https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
>
> I haven't looked in more detail yet, but before spending more time on it
> I'd like to know if the inclusion of the harness module is an oversight
> which can be quickly fixed. Regardless, I think this should be fixed first.
>
> Note that the binary also includes the jsearch jar.
> And while the binary isn't the release itself, if/when a convenience
> binary is provided *then* it needs to be in compliance with the
> distribution rules. So no GPL artifacts allowed.
>
> I also see the bundled LICENSE and NOTICE files in the binary zip
> are a bit weirdly formatted and the NOTICE file in particular.
> Seems both are produced by concatenating several files together, but
> the result is confusing, especially the NOTICE file.
>
> The NOTICE file should only contain what is needed, nothing
> more. Of the current content only the OSGi Alliance notice seems to be
> needed, beside the base NOTICE header.
>
> The LICENSE file correctly lists and appends the 3rd party licenses,
> but:
> a) The jsearch GPL-2-CP license obviously shouldn't be there (see above)
> b) The jemmy *external* libraries are available under CDDL or GPL-2-CP,
> in which case we simply 'pick' CDDL and don't need to include/append
> the GPL-2CP license too.
> This is (AFAIK) not blocking, but preferred to remove the GPL-2-CP
> license text as it easily can 'trip' casual reviewers or even
> automatic license scanning tools which may draw the wrong conclusion.
> (and why is jemmy an external dependency and not part of the code
> donation?)
>
> Finally, I tried to start the binary.
> Sorry for probably being a noob here but I can't figure out if I'm doing
> something wrong or the binary itself has a problem.
> If I try to just run the bin/netbeans shell script, I get the following
> error:
> WARNING [org.netbeans.core.startup.Main]
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org.netbeans.license.AcceptLicense starting
> from org.netbeans.MainImpl$BootClassLoader@1c20c684 with possible defining
> loaders null and declared parents ]
> at org.netbeans.core.startup.Main.getKlass(Main.java:341)
>
>
> Ate
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Jaroslav Tulach <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1 => let the bits attract attention of those who have bindings votes.
I have noticed few problems with the build as well. Reported as
NETBEANS-128 and NETBEANS-129. None of them is related to licensing, so I
think none of them shall stop the process of getting the 1st draft of alpha
version out. With or without fixes for #128 and #129, feel free to continue
the good work you are doing.
-jt
2017-11-08 7:54 GMT+01:00 Jan Lahoda <la...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Ate,
>
> Thanks a lot for your review and comments.
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
>
> > I get a different build error:
> >
> > BUILD FAILED
> > /home/ate/tmp/netbeans/netbeans-platform-source-
> platform-9.0-alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:122:
> > Download of 276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC712305A42A-net.java.html.boot.
> script-1.5.jar
> > produced content with hash 5DE9DD70EDCD9B30E0671ACC813F6F0C80E951AA when
> > 276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC712305A42A was expected
> >
>
> Sorry, not sure what is happening, I tried to download:
> https://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/
> netbeans/html/net.java.html.boot.script/1.5/net.java.html.
> boot.script-1.5.jar
>
> and it seems to have sha1sum:
> 276009d3f0a27079a80d241c3183ec712305a42a
>
>
> > But disregarding the above, I think a more serious, blocking, issue is
> > that AFAICT *not* all platform modules have been reviewed yet.
> > I notice this release candidate includes the apisupport.harness module.
> > And that still has status "To do". Furthermore, it depends on the *GPL*
> > external jsearch-2.0_05.jar which is a no-go... for the ASF.
> > See: https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
>
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this one I think there's no other solution than to
> simply remove that. The build of a platform application modules that have
> help will then (I believe) fail, but users should be able to supply the
> jar manually. (An alternative would be to make such a build pass with a
> warning, but since that would lead to a wrongly built module, it is better
> to continue failing IMO.)
>
> (We may need to enhance the license checking task to fail on GPL.)
>
> >
> >
> > I haven't looked in more detail yet, but before spending more time on it
> > I'd like to know if the inclusion of the harness module is an oversight
> > which can be quickly fixed. Regardless, I think this should be fixed
> first.
> >
>
> I was thinking of removing the harness, but a) we would need to finish work
> on harness sometime soon anyway; b) I think the platform is more useful
> with the harness than without it. So, I was fixing problems in the harness
> modules I've noticed.
>
> >
> > Note that the binary also includes the jsearch jar.
> > And while the binary isn't the release itself, if/when a convenience
> > binary is provided *then* it needs to be in compliance with the
> > distribution rules. So no GPL artifacts allowed.
> >
> > I also see the bundled LICENSE and NOTICE files in the binary zip
> > are a bit weirdly formatted and the NOTICE file in particular.
> > Seems both are produced by concatenating several files together, but
> > the result is confusing, especially the NOTICE file.
> >
>
> Yes, the NOTICE is a concatenation of several files, as i suspect it is not
> feasible to have a manually updated NOTICE file for each distribution we
> do. The form can surely be improved.
>
> >
> > The NOTICE file should only contain what is needed, nothing
> > more. Of the current content only the OSGi Alliance notice seems to be
> > needed, beside the base NOTICE header.
> >
>
> It unfortunately wasn't clear which notices are needed and which not, so I
> was trying to err on the side of including them. Fortunately, it should be
> very easy to reduce the notices.
>
>
> >
> > The LICENSE file correctly lists and appends the 3rd party licenses,
> > but:
> > a) The jsearch GPL-2-CP license obviously shouldn't be there (see above)
> > b) The jemmy *external* libraries are available under CDDL or GPL-2-CP,
> > in which case we simply 'pick' CDDL and don't need to include/append
> > the GPL-2CP license too.
> >
>
> Ok. It was not clear how to handle dual licenses. Stripping the GPL
> alternative should be simple.
>
> This is (AFAIK) not blocking, but preferred to remove the GPL-2-CP
>
> > license text as it easily can 'trip' casual reviewers or even
> > automatic license scanning tools which may draw the wrong conclusion.
> > (and why is jemmy an external dependency and not part of the code
> > donation?)
> >
> > Finally, I tried to start the binary.
> > Sorry for probably being a noob here but I can't figure out if I'm doing
> > something wrong or the binary itself has a problem.
> > If I try to just run the bin/netbeans shell script, I get the following
> > error:
> > WARNING [org.netbeans.core.startup.Main]
> > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org.netbeans.license.AcceptLicense
> > starting from org.netbeans.MainImpl$BootClassLoader@1c20c684 with
> > possible defining loaders null and declared parents ]
> > at org.netbeans.core.startup.Main.getKlass(Main.java:341)
> >
>
> Hm, I apparently was only starting this with ant tryme, which skips the
> license dialog :-( so i didn't notice. We need to fix this.
>
> Jan
>
> >
> >
> > Ate
> >
> >
> > On 2017-11-07 21:49, John McDonnell wrote:
> >
> >> I want to vote yes, but should the sources be buildable?
> >>
> >> If I execute ant the build fails?
> >>
> >> $ ant
> >> ...
> >> [insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
> >> maven.apisupport - at least can't find:
> >> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
> >> alpha/maven.apisupport/build.xml
> >> [insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
> >> timers - at least can't find:
> >> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
> >> alpha/timers/build.xml
> >>
> >> BUILD FAILED
> >> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
> >> alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:156:
> >> Some modules according your cluster config 'basic' are missing from
> >> checkout, see messages above.
> >>
> >> I removed all but 2 of the errors.
> >>
> >> Am I missing something? If I am then I'll happily vote +1 (non binding)
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> On 7 November 2017 at 19:20, Benny Neugebauer <bn...@bennyn.de> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> But the link to the artifact is broken. It should be:
> >>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
> >>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
> >>> netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
> >>>
> >>> On 2017-11-07 11:17, Geertjan Wielenga <g....@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi all,>
> >>>>
> >>>> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If
> >>>> this>
> >>>> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on>
> >>>> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
> >>>> release>
> >>>> this version.>
> >>>>
> >>>> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache
> >>>> NetBeans>
> >>>> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the
> >>>> NetBeans>
> >>>> Platform.>
> >>>>
> >>>> Build artifacts:>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
> >>>> bator-netbeans-release/>
> >>>>
> >>>> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.>
> >>>>
> >>>> The artifact to be voted on:>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
> >>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
> >>>> netbeans-platform-source-.zip>
> >>>>
> >>>> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
> >>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-
> >>>> temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt>
> >>>>
> >>>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll
> >>>> see>
> >>>> the NetBeans Platform:>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
> >>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
> >>>> netbeans-platform-bin-.zip>
> >>>>
> >>>> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES%2
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>.
Yup, agreed.
Great work, thanks.
Gj
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 at 21:36, Jan Lahoda <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Ate, I tried to clean up the notice fragments here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/261
>
> Overall, what we need to fix seems to be:
> -the notices:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/261
> -change the cluster.config in the source zip so that it only refers to the
> cluster config packed in the zip:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/260
> -not copy the ide launchers to the platform (working on that, but not done
> yet)
> -delete inclusion of jsearch.jar in apisupport.harness (should be trivial
> by itself)
> -add a README - this I guess may be the trickiest fix, as that needs to be
> different for the platform and for the IDE
>
> Geertjan, it might make sense to cancel the vote and restart it when this
> is done (as these changes are significant).
>
> Jan
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 2017-11-08 11:18, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2017-11-08 07:54, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Ate,
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks a lot for your review and comments.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I get a different build error:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> BUILD FAILED
> >>>>> /home/ate/tmp/netbeans/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.
> >>>>> 0-alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:122:
> >>>>> Download of 276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC
> >>>>> 712305A42A-net.java.html.boot.
> >>>>> script-1.5.jar
> >>>>> produced content with hash 5DE9DD70EDCD9B30E0671ACC813F6F0C80E951AA
> >>>>> when
> >>>>> 276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC712305A42A was expected
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sorry, not sure what is happening, I tried to download:
> >>>> https://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/netbeans
> >>>> /html/net.java.html.boot.script/1.5/net.java.html.boot.script-1.5.jar
> >>>>
> >>>> and it seems to have sha1sum:
> >>>> 276009d3f0a27079a80d241c3183ec712305a42a
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Indeed, if I download the above manually I can confirm it to have the
> >>> expected sha1sum.
> >>>
> >>> The problem seems to be caused by my local maven repository already
> >>> having these artifacts, and *those* have different sha1sum...
> >>> Disabling my local maven repository 'fixed' this and the build
> succeeds.
> >>> And ant tryme does start the platform now.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> But disregarding the above, I think a more serious, blocking, issue is
> >>>>
> >>>>> that AFAICT *not* all platform modules have been reviewed yet.
> >>>>> I notice this release candidate includes the apisupport.harness
> module.
> >>>>> And that still has status "To do". Furthermore, it depends on the
> *GPL*
> >>>>> external jsearch-2.0_05.jar which is a no-go... for the ASF.
> >>>>> See: https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Oops, sorry I missed this one I think there's no other solution than
> to
> >>>> simply remove that. The build of a platform application modules that
> >>>> have
> >>>> help will then (I believe) fail, but users should be able to supply
> the
> >>>> jar manually.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Just provide a README (and not just for this reason, see my other
> >>> problem starting the binary) which explains users what they need to do
> >>> *if* they want/need to use help.
> >>>
> >>> With regards to the current release candidate I've to vote -1 based on
> >>> the current findings as IMO this one is blocking.
> >>>
> >>> (An alternative would be to make such a build pass with a
> >>>
> >>>> warning, but since that would lead to a wrongly built module, it is
> >>>> better
> >>>> to continue failing IMO.)
> >>>>
> >>>> (We may need to enhance the license checking task to fail on GPL.)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> It most definitely should fail on encountering GPL.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> I haven't looked in more detail yet, but before spending more time on
> >>>>> it
> >>>>> I'd like to know if the inclusion of the harness module is an
> oversight
> >>>>> which can be quickly fixed. Regardless, I think this should be fixed
> >>>>> first.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I was thinking of removing the harness, but a) we would need to
> finish
> >>>> work
> >>>> on harness sometime soon anyway; b) I think the platform is more
> useful
> >>>> with the harness than without it. So, I was fixing problems in the
> >>>> harness
> >>>> modules I've noticed.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Note that the binary also includes the jsearch jar.
> >>>>> And while the binary isn't the release itself, if/when a convenience
> >>>>> binary is provided *then* it needs to be in compliance with the
> >>>>> distribution rules. So no GPL artifacts allowed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I also see the bundled LICENSE and NOTICE files in the binary zip
> >>>>> are a bit weirdly formatted and the NOTICE file in particular.
> >>>>> Seems both are produced by concatenating several files together, but
> >>>>> the result is confusing, especially the NOTICE file.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes, the NOTICE is a concatenation of several files, as i suspect it
> is
> >>>> not
> >>>> feasible to have a manually updated NOTICE file for each distribution
> we
> >>>> do. The form can surely be improved.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The NOTICE file should only contain what is needed, nothing
> >>>>> more. Of the current content only the OSGi Alliance notice seems to
> be
> >>>>> needed, beside the base NOTICE header.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It unfortunately wasn't clear which notices are needed and which not,
> >>>> so I
> >>>> was trying to err on the side of including them. Fortunately, it
> should
> >>>> be
> >>>> very easy to reduce the notices.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> A possible solution is to use/add an additional NOTICE-APPEND file,
> for
> >>> those modules that need it, which only contains the bits needing to be
> >>> appended, so without the standard Apache header.
> >>> Then the ant task just needs to aggregate/append those files (when
> >>> encountered) to the root NOTICE file.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> This is almost exactly what is done: there may be -notice.txt files in
> >> */external, which are merged (if the binary is used) to the NOTICE. I
> >> guess
> >> there is a problem with "the bits needing to be appended", which is
> still
> >> unclear to me (i.e. which exact notices need to be appended and which
> not,
> >> I've read the pages about that but still unclear to me).
> >>
> >
> > The canonical rule is defined here:
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
> >
> > Which bottom line means: only add (and aggregate) notices when
> > explicitly required.
> > Either because specific copyright notices were transferred from source
> > files OR when including (in source, or as bundled dependency) external
> > resources which carry or require a NOTICE (file) themselves.
> > The latter *may* include artifacts from the project itself (e.g. in case
> > of the binary distribution) which contain a NOTICE file.
> > But even then, only the relevant bits need/should be merged/appended.
> > So we should not merge NOTICE fragments for bit not applicable/bundled,
> > nor does the standard ASF NOTICE header
> >
> > <Project Foo>
> > Copyright x-y The Apache Software Foundation
> >
> > This product includes software developed at
> > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> >
> > be repeated.
> >
> > Following the above 'rules' should produce the correct and minimal
> > NOTICE file needed.
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> The LICENSE file correctly lists and appends the 3rd party licenses,
> >>>>> but:
> >>>>> a) The jsearch GPL-2-CP license obviously shouldn't be there (see
> >>>>> above)
> >>>>> b) The jemmy *external* libraries are available under CDDL or
> GPL-2-CP,
> >>>>> in which case we simply 'pick' CDDL and don't need to
> >>>>> include/append
> >>>>> the GPL-2CP license too.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ok. It was not clear how to handle dual licenses. Stripping the GPL
> >>>> alternative should be simple.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is (AFAIK) not blocking, but preferred to remove the
> GPL-2-CP
> >>>>
> >>>> license text as it easily can 'trip' casual reviewers or even
> >>>>
> >>>>> automatic license scanning tools which may draw the wrong
> >>>>> conclusion.
> >>>>> (and why is jemmy an external dependency and not part of the
> code
> >>>>> donation?)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Finally, I tried to start the binary.
> >>>>> Sorry for probably being a noob here but I can't figure out if I'm
> >>>>> doing
> >>>>> something wrong or the binary itself has a problem.
> >>>>> If I try to just run the bin/netbeans shell script, I get the
> following
> >>>>> error:
> >>>>> WARNING [org.netbeans.core.startup.Main]
> >>>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org.netbeans.license.AcceptLicense
> >>>>> starting from org.netbeans.MainImpl$BootClassLoader@1c20c684 with
> >>>>> possible defining loaders null and declared parents ]
> >>>>> at org.netbeans.core.startup.Main.getKlass(Main.java:341)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hm, I apparently was only starting this with ant tryme, which skips
> the
> >>>> license dialog :-( so i didn't notice. We need to fix this.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Yes, if the binary cannot be started/used then why provide it?
> >>>
> >>> IMO dome kind of instruction how to start/verify the binary should be
> >>> provided.
> >>> As a minimum in the vote thread, and when accepted in the release
> >>> announcement mail and release download page.
> >>> But preferably (also) in a bundled README, which then can provide more
> >>> details (see above).
> >>>
> >>>
> >> As Jarda noted in:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-128
> >>
> >> the "netbeans" launchers should not be there. These are IDE launchers,
> and
> >> should not be in the platform. Platform applications delegate to
> >> platform/lib/nbexec, which probably should be the only launcher in the
> >> platform (+the templates in the harness).
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Jan
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Ate
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2017-11-07 21:49, John McDonnell wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I want to vote yes, but should the sources be buildable?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If I execute ant the build fails?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> $ ant
> >>>>>> ...
> >>>>>> [insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
> >>>>>> maven.apisupport - at least can't find:
> >>>>>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
> >>>>>> alpha/maven.apisupport/build.xml
> >>>>>> [insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
> >>>>>> timers - at least can't find:
> >>>>>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
> >>>>>> alpha/timers/build.xml
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> BUILD FAILED
> >>>>>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
> >>>>>> alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:156:
> >>>>>> Some modules according your cluster config 'basic' are missing from
> >>>>>> checkout, see messages above.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I removed all but 2 of the errors.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Am I missing something? If I am then I'll happily vote +1 (non
> >>>>>> binding)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> John
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 7 November 2017 at 19:20, Benny Neugebauer <bn...@bennyn.de> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> But the link to the artifact is broken. It should be:
> >>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
> >>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
> >>>>>>> netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 2017-11-07 11:17, Geertjan Wielenga <g....@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi all,>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)!
> If
> >>>>>>>> this>
> >>>>>>>> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on>
> >>>>>>>> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
> >>>>>>>> release>
> >>>>>>>> this version.>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache
> >>>>>>>> NetBeans>
> >>>>>>>> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the
> >>>>>>>> NetBeans>
> >>>>>>>> Platform.>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Build artifacts:>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
> >>>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The artifact to be voted on:>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
> >>>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
> >>>>>>>> netbeans-platform-source-.zip>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
> >>>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-
> >>>>>>>> temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and
> >>>>>>>> you'll
> >>>>>>>> see>
> >>>>>>>> the NetBeans Platform:>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
> >>>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
> >>>>>>>> netbeans-platform-bin-.zip>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES%2
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>
jsearch dependency (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha
(incubating))
Posted by Antonio <an...@vieiro.net>.
El 08/11/17 a las 21:36, Jan Lahoda escribió:
> [...]
> -delete inclusion of jsearch.jar in apisupport.harness (should be trivial
> by itself)
Jan, will something like
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/263 do?
Cheers,
Antonio
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Jan Lahoda <la...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Ate, I tried to clean up the notice fragments here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/261
Overall, what we need to fix seems to be:
-the notices:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/261
-change the cluster.config in the source zip so that it only refers to the
cluster config packed in the zip:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/260
-not copy the ide launchers to the platform (working on that, but not done
yet)
-delete inclusion of jsearch.jar in apisupport.harness (should be trivial
by itself)
-add a README - this I guess may be the trickiest fix, as that needs to be
different for the platform and for the IDE
Geertjan, it might make sense to cancel the vote and restart it when this
is done (as these changes are significant).
Jan
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-11-08 11:18, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
>>
>> On 2017-11-08 07:54, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Ate,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot for your review and comments.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I get a different build error:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> BUILD FAILED
>>>>> /home/ate/tmp/netbeans/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.
>>>>> 0-alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:122:
>>>>> Download of 276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC
>>>>> 712305A42A-net.java.html.boot.
>>>>> script-1.5.jar
>>>>> produced content with hash 5DE9DD70EDCD9B30E0671ACC813F6F0C80E951AA
>>>>> when
>>>>> 276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC712305A42A was expected
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, not sure what is happening, I tried to download:
>>>> https://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/netbeans
>>>> /html/net.java.html.boot.script/1.5/net.java.html.boot.script-1.5.jar
>>>>
>>>> and it seems to have sha1sum:
>>>> 276009d3f0a27079a80d241c3183ec712305a42a
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Indeed, if I download the above manually I can confirm it to have the
>>> expected sha1sum.
>>>
>>> The problem seems to be caused by my local maven repository already
>>> having these artifacts, and *those* have different sha1sum...
>>> Disabling my local maven repository 'fixed' this and the build succeeds.
>>> And ant tryme does start the platform now.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> But disregarding the above, I think a more serious, blocking, issue is
>>>>
>>>>> that AFAICT *not* all platform modules have been reviewed yet.
>>>>> I notice this release candidate includes the apisupport.harness module.
>>>>> And that still has status "To do". Furthermore, it depends on the *GPL*
>>>>> external jsearch-2.0_05.jar which is a no-go... for the ASF.
>>>>> See: https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oops, sorry I missed this one I think there's no other solution than to
>>>> simply remove that. The build of a platform application modules that
>>>> have
>>>> help will then (I believe) fail, but users should be able to supply the
>>>> jar manually.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Just provide a README (and not just for this reason, see my other
>>> problem starting the binary) which explains users what they need to do
>>> *if* they want/need to use help.
>>>
>>> With regards to the current release candidate I've to vote -1 based on
>>> the current findings as IMO this one is blocking.
>>>
>>> (An alternative would be to make such a build pass with a
>>>
>>>> warning, but since that would lead to a wrongly built module, it is
>>>> better
>>>> to continue failing IMO.)
>>>>
>>>> (We may need to enhance the license checking task to fail on GPL.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It most definitely should fail on encountering GPL.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I haven't looked in more detail yet, but before spending more time on
>>>>> it
>>>>> I'd like to know if the inclusion of the harness module is an oversight
>>>>> which can be quickly fixed. Regardless, I think this should be fixed
>>>>> first.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I was thinking of removing the harness, but a) we would need to finish
>>>> work
>>>> on harness sometime soon anyway; b) I think the platform is more useful
>>>> with the harness than without it. So, I was fixing problems in the
>>>> harness
>>>> modules I've noticed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Note that the binary also includes the jsearch jar.
>>>>> And while the binary isn't the release itself, if/when a convenience
>>>>> binary is provided *then* it needs to be in compliance with the
>>>>> distribution rules. So no GPL artifacts allowed.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also see the bundled LICENSE and NOTICE files in the binary zip
>>>>> are a bit weirdly formatted and the NOTICE file in particular.
>>>>> Seems both are produced by concatenating several files together, but
>>>>> the result is confusing, especially the NOTICE file.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, the NOTICE is a concatenation of several files, as i suspect it is
>>>> not
>>>> feasible to have a manually updated NOTICE file for each distribution we
>>>> do. The form can surely be improved.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The NOTICE file should only contain what is needed, nothing
>>>>> more. Of the current content only the OSGi Alliance notice seems to be
>>>>> needed, beside the base NOTICE header.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It unfortunately wasn't clear which notices are needed and which not,
>>>> so I
>>>> was trying to err on the side of including them. Fortunately, it should
>>>> be
>>>> very easy to reduce the notices.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A possible solution is to use/add an additional NOTICE-APPEND file, for
>>> those modules that need it, which only contains the bits needing to be
>>> appended, so without the standard Apache header.
>>> Then the ant task just needs to aggregate/append those files (when
>>> encountered) to the root NOTICE file.
>>>
>>>
>> This is almost exactly what is done: there may be -notice.txt files in
>> */external, which are merged (if the binary is used) to the NOTICE. I
>> guess
>> there is a problem with "the bits needing to be appended", which is still
>> unclear to me (i.e. which exact notices need to be appended and which not,
>> I've read the pages about that but still unclear to me).
>>
>
> The canonical rule is defined here:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>
> Which bottom line means: only add (and aggregate) notices when
> explicitly required.
> Either because specific copyright notices were transferred from source
> files OR when including (in source, or as bundled dependency) external
> resources which carry or require a NOTICE (file) themselves.
> The latter *may* include artifacts from the project itself (e.g. in case
> of the binary distribution) which contain a NOTICE file.
> But even then, only the relevant bits need/should be merged/appended.
> So we should not merge NOTICE fragments for bit not applicable/bundled,
> nor does the standard ASF NOTICE header
>
> <Project Foo>
> Copyright x-y The Apache Software Foundation
>
> This product includes software developed at
> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>
> be repeated.
>
> Following the above 'rules' should produce the correct and minimal
> NOTICE file needed.
>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> The LICENSE file correctly lists and appends the 3rd party licenses,
>>>>> but:
>>>>> a) The jsearch GPL-2-CP license obviously shouldn't be there (see
>>>>> above)
>>>>> b) The jemmy *external* libraries are available under CDDL or GPL-2-CP,
>>>>> in which case we simply 'pick' CDDL and don't need to
>>>>> include/append
>>>>> the GPL-2CP license too.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok. It was not clear how to handle dual licenses. Stripping the GPL
>>>> alternative should be simple.
>>>>
>>>> This is (AFAIK) not blocking, but preferred to remove the GPL-2-CP
>>>>
>>>> license text as it easily can 'trip' casual reviewers or even
>>>>
>>>>> automatic license scanning tools which may draw the wrong
>>>>> conclusion.
>>>>> (and why is jemmy an external dependency and not part of the code
>>>>> donation?)
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally, I tried to start the binary.
>>>>> Sorry for probably being a noob here but I can't figure out if I'm
>>>>> doing
>>>>> something wrong or the binary itself has a problem.
>>>>> If I try to just run the bin/netbeans shell script, I get the following
>>>>> error:
>>>>> WARNING [org.netbeans.core.startup.Main]
>>>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org.netbeans.license.AcceptLicense
>>>>> starting from org.netbeans.MainImpl$BootClassLoader@1c20c684 with
>>>>> possible defining loaders null and declared parents ]
>>>>> at org.netbeans.core.startup.Main.getKlass(Main.java:341)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hm, I apparently was only starting this with ant tryme, which skips the
>>>> license dialog :-( so i didn't notice. We need to fix this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Yes, if the binary cannot be started/used then why provide it?
>>>
>>> IMO dome kind of instruction how to start/verify the binary should be
>>> provided.
>>> As a minimum in the vote thread, and when accepted in the release
>>> announcement mail and release download page.
>>> But preferably (also) in a bundled README, which then can provide more
>>> details (see above).
>>>
>>>
>> As Jarda noted in:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-128
>>
>> the "netbeans" launchers should not be there. These are IDE launchers, and
>> should not be in the platform. Platform applications delegate to
>> platform/lib/nbexec, which probably should be the only launcher in the
>> platform (+the templates in the harness).
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Ate
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2017-11-07 21:49, John McDonnell wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I want to vote yes, but should the sources be buildable?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I execute ant the build fails?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ ant
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> [insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
>>>>>> maven.apisupport - at least can't find:
>>>>>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
>>>>>> alpha/maven.apisupport/build.xml
>>>>>> [insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
>>>>>> timers - at least can't find:
>>>>>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
>>>>>> alpha/timers/build.xml
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BUILD FAILED
>>>>>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
>>>>>> alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:156:
>>>>>> Some modules according your cluster config 'basic' are missing from
>>>>>> checkout, see messages above.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I removed all but 2 of the errors.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am I missing something? If I am then I'll happily vote +1 (non
>>>>>> binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7 November 2017 at 19:20, Benny Neugebauer <bn...@bennyn.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But the link to the artifact is broken. It should be:
>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
>>>>>>> netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2017-11-07 11:17, Geertjan Wielenga <g....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If
>>>>>>>> this>
>>>>>>>> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on>
>>>>>>>> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
>>>>>>>> release>
>>>>>>>> this version.>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache
>>>>>>>> NetBeans>
>>>>>>>> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the
>>>>>>>> NetBeans>
>>>>>>>> Platform.>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Build artifacts:>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The artifact to be voted on:>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
>>>>>>>> netbeans-platform-source-.zip>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-
>>>>>>>> temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and
>>>>>>>> you'll
>>>>>>>> see>
>>>>>>>> the NetBeans Platform:>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
>>>>>>>> netbeans-platform-bin-.zip>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES%2
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 2017-11-08 11:18, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
>
>> On 2017-11-08 07:54, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ate,
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for your review and comments.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
>>>
>>> I get a different build error:
>>>>
>>>> BUILD FAILED
>>>> /home/ate/tmp/netbeans/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.
>>>> 0-alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:122:
>>>> Download of 276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC712305A42A-net.java.html.boot.
>>>> script-1.5.jar
>>>> produced content with hash 5DE9DD70EDCD9B30E0671ACC813F6F0C80E951AA when
>>>> 276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC712305A42A was expected
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Sorry, not sure what is happening, I tried to download:
>>> https://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/netbeans
>>> /html/net.java.html.boot.script/1.5/net.java.html.boot.script-1.5.jar
>>>
>>> and it seems to have sha1sum:
>>> 276009d3f0a27079a80d241c3183ec712305a42a
>>>
>>
>> Indeed, if I download the above manually I can confirm it to have the
>> expected sha1sum.
>>
>> The problem seems to be caused by my local maven repository already
>> having these artifacts, and *those* have different sha1sum...
>> Disabling my local maven repository 'fixed' this and the build succeeds.
>> And ant tryme does start the platform now.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> But disregarding the above, I think a more serious, blocking, issue is
>>>> that AFAICT *not* all platform modules have been reviewed yet.
>>>> I notice this release candidate includes the apisupport.harness module.
>>>> And that still has status "To do". Furthermore, it depends on the *GPL*
>>>> external jsearch-2.0_05.jar which is a no-go... for the ASF.
>>>> See: https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Oops, sorry I missed this one I think there's no other solution than to
>>> simply remove that. The build of a platform application modules that have
>>> help will then (I believe) fail, but users should be able to supply the
>>> jar manually.
>>>
>>
>> Just provide a README (and not just for this reason, see my other
>> problem starting the binary) which explains users what they need to do
>> *if* they want/need to use help.
>>
>> With regards to the current release candidate I've to vote -1 based on
>> the current findings as IMO this one is blocking.
>>
>> (An alternative would be to make such a build pass with a
>>> warning, but since that would lead to a wrongly built module, it is better
>>> to continue failing IMO.)
>>>
>>> (We may need to enhance the license checking task to fail on GPL.)
>>>
>>
>> It most definitely should fail on encountering GPL.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I haven't looked in more detail yet, but before spending more time on it
>>>> I'd like to know if the inclusion of the harness module is an oversight
>>>> which can be quickly fixed. Regardless, I think this should be fixed
>>>> first.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I was thinking of removing the harness, but a) we would need to finish
>>> work
>>> on harness sometime soon anyway; b) I think the platform is more useful
>>> with the harness than without it. So, I was fixing problems in the harness
>>> modules I've noticed.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Note that the binary also includes the jsearch jar.
>>>> And while the binary isn't the release itself, if/when a convenience
>>>> binary is provided *then* it needs to be in compliance with the
>>>> distribution rules. So no GPL artifacts allowed.
>>>>
>>>> I also see the bundled LICENSE and NOTICE files in the binary zip
>>>> are a bit weirdly formatted and the NOTICE file in particular.
>>>> Seems both are produced by concatenating several files together, but
>>>> the result is confusing, especially the NOTICE file.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Yes, the NOTICE is a concatenation of several files, as i suspect it is
>>> not
>>> feasible to have a manually updated NOTICE file for each distribution we
>>> do. The form can surely be improved.
>>>
>>>
>>>> The NOTICE file should only contain what is needed, nothing
>>>> more. Of the current content only the OSGi Alliance notice seems to be
>>>> needed, beside the base NOTICE header.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It unfortunately wasn't clear which notices are needed and which not, so I
>>> was trying to err on the side of including them. Fortunately, it should be
>>> very easy to reduce the notices.
>>>
>>>
>> A possible solution is to use/add an additional NOTICE-APPEND file, for
>> those modules that need it, which only contains the bits needing to be
>> appended, so without the standard Apache header.
>> Then the ant task just needs to aggregate/append those files (when
>> encountered) to the root NOTICE file.
>>
>
> This is almost exactly what is done: there may be -notice.txt files in
> */external, which are merged (if the binary is used) to the NOTICE. I guess
> there is a problem with "the bits needing to be appended", which is still
> unclear to me (i.e. which exact notices need to be appended and which not,
> I've read the pages about that but still unclear to me).
The canonical rule is defined here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
Which bottom line means: only add (and aggregate) notices when
explicitly required.
Either because specific copyright notices were transferred from source
files OR when including (in source, or as bundled dependency) external
resources which carry or require a NOTICE (file) themselves.
The latter *may* include artifacts from the project itself (e.g. in case
of the binary distribution) which contain a NOTICE file.
But even then, only the relevant bits need/should be merged/appended.
So we should not merge NOTICE fragments for bit not applicable/bundled,
nor does the standard ASF NOTICE header
<Project Foo>
Copyright x-y The Apache Software Foundation
This product includes software developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
be repeated.
Following the above 'rules' should produce the correct and minimal
NOTICE file needed.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> The LICENSE file correctly lists and appends the 3rd party licenses,
>>>> but:
>>>> a) The jsearch GPL-2-CP license obviously shouldn't be there (see above)
>>>> b) The jemmy *external* libraries are available under CDDL or GPL-2-CP,
>>>> in which case we simply 'pick' CDDL and don't need to include/append
>>>> the GPL-2CP license too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Ok. It was not clear how to handle dual licenses. Stripping the GPL
>>> alternative should be simple.
>>>
>>> This is (AFAIK) not blocking, but preferred to remove the GPL-2-CP
>>>
>>> license text as it easily can 'trip' casual reviewers or even
>>>> automatic license scanning tools which may draw the wrong conclusion.
>>>> (and why is jemmy an external dependency and not part of the code
>>>> donation?)
>>>>
>>>> Finally, I tried to start the binary.
>>>> Sorry for probably being a noob here but I can't figure out if I'm doing
>>>> something wrong or the binary itself has a problem.
>>>> If I try to just run the bin/netbeans shell script, I get the following
>>>> error:
>>>> WARNING [org.netbeans.core.startup.Main]
>>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org.netbeans.license.AcceptLicense
>>>> starting from org.netbeans.MainImpl$BootClassLoader@1c20c684 with
>>>> possible defining loaders null and declared parents ]
>>>> at org.netbeans.core.startup.Main.getKlass(Main.java:341)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hm, I apparently was only starting this with ant tryme, which skips the
>>> license dialog :-( so i didn't notice. We need to fix this.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, if the binary cannot be started/used then why provide it?
>>
>> IMO dome kind of instruction how to start/verify the binary should be
>> provided.
>> As a minimum in the vote thread, and when accepted in the release
>> announcement mail and release download page.
>> But preferably (also) in a bundled README, which then can provide more
>> details (see above).
>>
>
> As Jarda noted in:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-128
>
> the "netbeans" launchers should not be there. These are IDE launchers, and
> should not be in the platform. Platform applications delegate to
> platform/lib/nbexec, which probably should be the only launcher in the
> platform (+the templates in the harness).
>
> Jan
>
>
>>
>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ate
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2017-11-07 21:49, John McDonnell wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I want to vote yes, but should the sources be buildable?
>>>>>
>>>>> If I execute ant the build fails?
>>>>>
>>>>> $ ant
>>>>> ...
>>>>> [insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
>>>>> maven.apisupport - at least can't find:
>>>>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
>>>>> alpha/maven.apisupport/build.xml
>>>>> [insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
>>>>> timers - at least can't find:
>>>>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
>>>>> alpha/timers/build.xml
>>>>>
>>>>> BUILD FAILED
>>>>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
>>>>> alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:156:
>>>>> Some modules according your cluster config 'basic' are missing from
>>>>> checkout, see messages above.
>>>>>
>>>>> I removed all but 2 of the errors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Am I missing something? If I am then I'll happily vote +1 (non binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> John
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7 November 2017 at 19:20, Benny Neugebauer <bn...@bennyn.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But the link to the artifact is broken. It should be:
>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
>>>>>> netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2017-11-07 11:17, Geertjan Wielenga <g....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If
>>>>>>> this>
>>>>>>> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on>
>>>>>>> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
>>>>>>> release>
>>>>>>> this version.>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache
>>>>>>> NetBeans>
>>>>>>> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the
>>>>>>> NetBeans>
>>>>>>> Platform.>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Build artifacts:>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The artifact to be voted on:>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
>>>>>>> netbeans-platform-source-.zip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-
>>>>>>> temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll
>>>>>>> see>
>>>>>>> the NetBeans Platform:>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
>>>>>>> netbeans-platform-bin-.zip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES%2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Jan Lahoda <la...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
> On 2017-11-08 07:54, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>
>> Hi Ate,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your review and comments.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
>>
>> I get a different build error:
>>>
>>> BUILD FAILED
>>> /home/ate/tmp/netbeans/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.
>>> 0-alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:122:
>>> Download of 276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC712305A42A-net.java.html.boot.
>>> script-1.5.jar
>>> produced content with hash 5DE9DD70EDCD9B30E0671ACC813F6F0C80E951AA when
>>> 276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC712305A42A was expected
>>>
>>>
>> Sorry, not sure what is happening, I tried to download:
>> https://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/netbeans
>> /html/net.java.html.boot.script/1.5/net.java.html.boot.script-1.5.jar
>>
>> and it seems to have sha1sum:
>> 276009d3f0a27079a80d241c3183ec712305a42a
>>
>
> Indeed, if I download the above manually I can confirm it to have the
> expected sha1sum.
>
> The problem seems to be caused by my local maven repository already
> having these artifacts, and *those* have different sha1sum...
> Disabling my local maven repository 'fixed' this and the build succeeds.
> And ant tryme does start the platform now.
>
>
>>
>> But disregarding the above, I think a more serious, blocking, issue is
>>> that AFAICT *not* all platform modules have been reviewed yet.
>>> I notice this release candidate includes the apisupport.harness module.
>>> And that still has status "To do". Furthermore, it depends on the *GPL*
>>> external jsearch-2.0_05.jar which is a no-go... for the ASF.
>>> See: https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
>>>
>>
>>
>> Oops, sorry I missed this one I think there's no other solution than to
>> simply remove that. The build of a platform application modules that have
>> help will then (I believe) fail, but users should be able to supply the
>> jar manually.
>>
>
> Just provide a README (and not just for this reason, see my other
> problem starting the binary) which explains users what they need to do
> *if* they want/need to use help.
>
> With regards to the current release candidate I've to vote -1 based on
> the current findings as IMO this one is blocking.
>
> (An alternative would be to make such a build pass with a
>> warning, but since that would lead to a wrongly built module, it is better
>> to continue failing IMO.)
>>
>> (We may need to enhance the license checking task to fail on GPL.)
>>
>
> It most definitely should fail on encountering GPL.
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> I haven't looked in more detail yet, but before spending more time on it
>>> I'd like to know if the inclusion of the harness module is an oversight
>>> which can be quickly fixed. Regardless, I think this should be fixed
>>> first.
>>>
>>>
>> I was thinking of removing the harness, but a) we would need to finish
>> work
>> on harness sometime soon anyway; b) I think the platform is more useful
>> with the harness than without it. So, I was fixing problems in the harness
>> modules I've noticed.
>>
>>
>>> Note that the binary also includes the jsearch jar.
>>> And while the binary isn't the release itself, if/when a convenience
>>> binary is provided *then* it needs to be in compliance with the
>>> distribution rules. So no GPL artifacts allowed.
>>>
>>> I also see the bundled LICENSE and NOTICE files in the binary zip
>>> are a bit weirdly formatted and the NOTICE file in particular.
>>> Seems both are produced by concatenating several files together, but
>>> the result is confusing, especially the NOTICE file.
>>>
>>>
>> Yes, the NOTICE is a concatenation of several files, as i suspect it is
>> not
>> feasible to have a manually updated NOTICE file for each distribution we
>> do. The form can surely be improved.
>>
>>
>>> The NOTICE file should only contain what is needed, nothing
>>> more. Of the current content only the OSGi Alliance notice seems to be
>>> needed, beside the base NOTICE header.
>>>
>>>
>> It unfortunately wasn't clear which notices are needed and which not, so I
>> was trying to err on the side of including them. Fortunately, it should be
>> very easy to reduce the notices.
>>
>>
> A possible solution is to use/add an additional NOTICE-APPEND file, for
> those modules that need it, which only contains the bits needing to be
> appended, so without the standard Apache header.
> Then the ant task just needs to aggregate/append those files (when
> encountered) to the root NOTICE file.
>
This is almost exactly what is done: there may be -notice.txt files in
*/external, which are merged (if the binary is used) to the NOTICE. I guess
there is a problem with "the bits needing to be appended", which is still
unclear to me (i.e. which exact notices need to be appended and which not,
I've read the pages about that but still unclear to me).
>
>
>
>>
>>> The LICENSE file correctly lists and appends the 3rd party licenses,
>>> but:
>>> a) The jsearch GPL-2-CP license obviously shouldn't be there (see above)
>>> b) The jemmy *external* libraries are available under CDDL or GPL-2-CP,
>>> in which case we simply 'pick' CDDL and don't need to include/append
>>> the GPL-2CP license too.
>>>
>>>
>> Ok. It was not clear how to handle dual licenses. Stripping the GPL
>> alternative should be simple.
>>
>> This is (AFAIK) not blocking, but preferred to remove the GPL-2-CP
>>
>> license text as it easily can 'trip' casual reviewers or even
>>> automatic license scanning tools which may draw the wrong conclusion.
>>> (and why is jemmy an external dependency and not part of the code
>>> donation?)
>>>
>>> Finally, I tried to start the binary.
>>> Sorry for probably being a noob here but I can't figure out if I'm doing
>>> something wrong or the binary itself has a problem.
>>> If I try to just run the bin/netbeans shell script, I get the following
>>> error:
>>> WARNING [org.netbeans.core.startup.Main]
>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org.netbeans.license.AcceptLicense
>>> starting from org.netbeans.MainImpl$BootClassLoader@1c20c684 with
>>> possible defining loaders null and declared parents ]
>>> at org.netbeans.core.startup.Main.getKlass(Main.java:341)
>>>
>>>
>> Hm, I apparently was only starting this with ant tryme, which skips the
>> license dialog :-( so i didn't notice. We need to fix this.
>>
>
> Yes, if the binary cannot be started/used then why provide it?
>
> IMO dome kind of instruction how to start/verify the binary should be
> provided.
> As a minimum in the vote thread, and when accepted in the release
> announcement mail and release download page.
> But preferably (also) in a bundled README, which then can provide more
> details (see above).
>
As Jarda noted in:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-128
the "netbeans" launchers should not be there. These are IDE launchers, and
should not be in the platform. Platform applications delegate to
platform/lib/nbexec, which probably should be the only launcher in the
platform (+the templates in the harness).
Jan
>
>
>> Jan
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Ate
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2017-11-07 21:49, John McDonnell wrote:
>>>
>>> I want to vote yes, but should the sources be buildable?
>>>>
>>>> If I execute ant the build fails?
>>>>
>>>> $ ant
>>>> ...
>>>> [insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
>>>> maven.apisupport - at least can't find:
>>>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
>>>> alpha/maven.apisupport/build.xml
>>>> [insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
>>>> timers - at least can't find:
>>>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
>>>> alpha/timers/build.xml
>>>>
>>>> BUILD FAILED
>>>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
>>>> alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:156:
>>>> Some modules according your cluster config 'basic' are missing from
>>>> checkout, see messages above.
>>>>
>>>> I removed all but 2 of the errors.
>>>>
>>>> Am I missing something? If I am then I'll happily vote +1 (non binding)
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>> On 7 November 2017 at 19:20, Benny Neugebauer <bn...@bennyn.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> But the link to the artifact is broken. It should be:
>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
>>>>> netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2017-11-07 11:17, Geertjan Wielenga <g....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If
>>>>>> this>
>>>>>> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on>
>>>>>> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
>>>>>> release>
>>>>>> this version.>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache
>>>>>> NetBeans>
>>>>>> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the
>>>>>> NetBeans>
>>>>>> Platform.>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Build artifacts:>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The artifact to be voted on:>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
>>>>>> netbeans-platform-source-.zip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-
>>>>>> temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll
>>>>>> see>
>>>>>> the NetBeans Platform:>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
>>>>>> netbeans-platform-bin-.zip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES%2
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 2017-11-08 07:54, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Hi Ate,
>
> Thanks a lot for your review and comments.
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
>
>> I get a different build error:
>>
>> BUILD FAILED
>> /home/ate/tmp/netbeans/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:122:
>> Download of 276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC712305A42A-net.java.html.boot.script-1.5.jar
>> produced content with hash 5DE9DD70EDCD9B30E0671ACC813F6F0C80E951AA when
>> 276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC712305A42A was expected
>>
>
> Sorry, not sure what is happening, I tried to download:
> https://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/netbeans/html/net.java.html.boot.script/1.5/net.java.html.boot.script-1.5.jar
>
> and it seems to have sha1sum:
> 276009d3f0a27079a80d241c3183ec712305a42a
Indeed, if I download the above manually I can confirm it to have the
expected sha1sum.
The problem seems to be caused by my local maven repository already
having these artifacts, and *those* have different sha1sum...
Disabling my local maven repository 'fixed' this and the build succeeds.
And ant tryme does start the platform now.
>
>
>> But disregarding the above, I think a more serious, blocking, issue is
>> that AFAICT *not* all platform modules have been reviewed yet.
>> I notice this release candidate includes the apisupport.harness module.
>> And that still has status "To do". Furthermore, it depends on the *GPL*
>> external jsearch-2.0_05.jar which is a no-go... for the ASF.
>> See: https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
>
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this one I think there's no other solution than to
> simply remove that. The build of a platform application modules that have
> help will then (I believe) fail, but users should be able to supply the
> jar manually.
Just provide a README (and not just for this reason, see my other
problem starting the binary) which explains users what they need to do
*if* they want/need to use help.
With regards to the current release candidate I've to vote -1 based on
the current findings as IMO this one is blocking.
> (An alternative would be to make such a build pass with a
> warning, but since that would lead to a wrongly built module, it is better
> to continue failing IMO.)
>
> (We may need to enhance the license checking task to fail on GPL.)
It most definitely should fail on encountering GPL.
>
>>
>>
>> I haven't looked in more detail yet, but before spending more time on it
>> I'd like to know if the inclusion of the harness module is an oversight
>> which can be quickly fixed. Regardless, I think this should be fixed first.
>>
>
> I was thinking of removing the harness, but a) we would need to finish work
> on harness sometime soon anyway; b) I think the platform is more useful
> with the harness than without it. So, I was fixing problems in the harness
> modules I've noticed.
>
>>
>> Note that the binary also includes the jsearch jar.
>> And while the binary isn't the release itself, if/when a convenience
>> binary is provided *then* it needs to be in compliance with the
>> distribution rules. So no GPL artifacts allowed.
>>
>> I also see the bundled LICENSE and NOTICE files in the binary zip
>> are a bit weirdly formatted and the NOTICE file in particular.
>> Seems both are produced by concatenating several files together, but
>> the result is confusing, especially the NOTICE file.
>>
>
> Yes, the NOTICE is a concatenation of several files, as i suspect it is not
> feasible to have a manually updated NOTICE file for each distribution we
> do. The form can surely be improved.
>
>>
>> The NOTICE file should only contain what is needed, nothing
>> more. Of the current content only the OSGi Alliance notice seems to be
>> needed, beside the base NOTICE header.
>>
>
> It unfortunately wasn't clear which notices are needed and which not, so I
> was trying to err on the side of including them. Fortunately, it should be
> very easy to reduce the notices.
>
A possible solution is to use/add an additional NOTICE-APPEND file, for
those modules that need it, which only contains the bits needing to be
appended, so without the standard Apache header.
Then the ant task just needs to aggregate/append those files (when
encountered) to the root NOTICE file.
>
>>
>> The LICENSE file correctly lists and appends the 3rd party licenses,
>> but:
>> a) The jsearch GPL-2-CP license obviously shouldn't be there (see above)
>> b) The jemmy *external* libraries are available under CDDL or GPL-2-CP,
>> in which case we simply 'pick' CDDL and don't need to include/append
>> the GPL-2CP license too.
>>
>
> Ok. It was not clear how to handle dual licenses. Stripping the GPL
> alternative should be simple.
>
> This is (AFAIK) not blocking, but preferred to remove the GPL-2-CP
>
>> license text as it easily can 'trip' casual reviewers or even
>> automatic license scanning tools which may draw the wrong conclusion.
>> (and why is jemmy an external dependency and not part of the code
>> donation?)
>>
>> Finally, I tried to start the binary.
>> Sorry for probably being a noob here but I can't figure out if I'm doing
>> something wrong or the binary itself has a problem.
>> If I try to just run the bin/netbeans shell script, I get the following
>> error:
>> WARNING [org.netbeans.core.startup.Main]
>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org.netbeans.license.AcceptLicense
>> starting from org.netbeans.MainImpl$BootClassLoader@1c20c684 with
>> possible defining loaders null and declared parents ]
>> at org.netbeans.core.startup.Main.getKlass(Main.java:341)
>>
>
> Hm, I apparently was only starting this with ant tryme, which skips the
> license dialog :-( so i didn't notice. We need to fix this.
Yes, if the binary cannot be started/used then why provide it?
IMO dome kind of instruction how to start/verify the binary should be
provided.
As a minimum in the vote thread, and when accepted in the release
announcement mail and release download page.
But preferably (also) in a bundled README, which then can provide more
details (see above).
>
> Jan
>
>>
>>
>> Ate
>>
>>
>> On 2017-11-07 21:49, John McDonnell wrote:
>>
>>> I want to vote yes, but should the sources be buildable?
>>>
>>> If I execute ant the build fails?
>>>
>>> $ ant
>>> ...
>>> [insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
>>> maven.apisupport - at least can't find:
>>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
>>> alpha/maven.apisupport/build.xml
>>> [insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
>>> timers - at least can't find:
>>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
>>> alpha/timers/build.xml
>>>
>>> BUILD FAILED
>>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
>>> alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:156:
>>> Some modules according your cluster config 'basic' are missing from
>>> checkout, see messages above.
>>>
>>> I removed all but 2 of the errors.
>>>
>>> Am I missing something? If I am then I'll happily vote +1 (non binding)
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> On 7 November 2017 at 19:20, Benny Neugebauer <bn...@bennyn.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> But the link to the artifact is broken. It should be:
>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
>>>> netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
>>>>
>>>> On 2017-11-07 11:17, Geertjan Wielenga <g....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If
>>>>> this>
>>>>> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on>
>>>>> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
>>>>> release>
>>>>> this version.>
>>>>>
>>>>> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache
>>>>> NetBeans>
>>>>> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the
>>>>> NetBeans>
>>>>> Platform.>
>>>>>
>>>>> Build artifacts:>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/>
>>>>>
>>>>> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.>
>>>>>
>>>>> The artifact to be voted on:>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
>>>>> netbeans-platform-source-.zip>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-
>>>>> temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt>
>>>>>
>>>>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll
>>>>> see>
>>>>> the NetBeans Platform:>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
>>>>> netbeans-platform-bin-.zip>
>>>>>
>>>>> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES%2
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Jan Lahoda <la...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ate,
Thanks a lot for your review and comments.
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
> I get a different build error:
>
> BUILD FAILED
> /home/ate/tmp/netbeans/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:122:
> Download of 276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC712305A42A-net.java.html.boot.script-1.5.jar
> produced content with hash 5DE9DD70EDCD9B30E0671ACC813F6F0C80E951AA when
> 276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC712305A42A was expected
>
Sorry, not sure what is happening, I tried to download:
https://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/netbeans/html/net.java.html.boot.script/1.5/net.java.html.boot.script-1.5.jar
and it seems to have sha1sum:
276009d3f0a27079a80d241c3183ec712305a42a
> But disregarding the above, I think a more serious, blocking, issue is
> that AFAICT *not* all platform modules have been reviewed yet.
> I notice this release candidate includes the apisupport.harness module.
> And that still has status "To do". Furthermore, it depends on the *GPL*
> external jsearch-2.0_05.jar which is a no-go... for the ASF.
> See: https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
Oops, sorry I missed this one I think there's no other solution than to
simply remove that. The build of a platform application modules that have
help will then (I believe) fail, but users should be able to supply the
jar manually. (An alternative would be to make such a build pass with a
warning, but since that would lead to a wrongly built module, it is better
to continue failing IMO.)
(We may need to enhance the license checking task to fail on GPL.)
>
>
> I haven't looked in more detail yet, but before spending more time on it
> I'd like to know if the inclusion of the harness module is an oversight
> which can be quickly fixed. Regardless, I think this should be fixed first.
>
I was thinking of removing the harness, but a) we would need to finish work
on harness sometime soon anyway; b) I think the platform is more useful
with the harness than without it. So, I was fixing problems in the harness
modules I've noticed.
>
> Note that the binary also includes the jsearch jar.
> And while the binary isn't the release itself, if/when a convenience
> binary is provided *then* it needs to be in compliance with the
> distribution rules. So no GPL artifacts allowed.
>
> I also see the bundled LICENSE and NOTICE files in the binary zip
> are a bit weirdly formatted and the NOTICE file in particular.
> Seems both are produced by concatenating several files together, but
> the result is confusing, especially the NOTICE file.
>
Yes, the NOTICE is a concatenation of several files, as i suspect it is not
feasible to have a manually updated NOTICE file for each distribution we
do. The form can surely be improved.
>
> The NOTICE file should only contain what is needed, nothing
> more. Of the current content only the OSGi Alliance notice seems to be
> needed, beside the base NOTICE header.
>
It unfortunately wasn't clear which notices are needed and which not, so I
was trying to err on the side of including them. Fortunately, it should be
very easy to reduce the notices.
>
> The LICENSE file correctly lists and appends the 3rd party licenses,
> but:
> a) The jsearch GPL-2-CP license obviously shouldn't be there (see above)
> b) The jemmy *external* libraries are available under CDDL or GPL-2-CP,
> in which case we simply 'pick' CDDL and don't need to include/append
> the GPL-2CP license too.
>
Ok. It was not clear how to handle dual licenses. Stripping the GPL
alternative should be simple.
This is (AFAIK) not blocking, but preferred to remove the GPL-2-CP
> license text as it easily can 'trip' casual reviewers or even
> automatic license scanning tools which may draw the wrong conclusion.
> (and why is jemmy an external dependency and not part of the code
> donation?)
>
> Finally, I tried to start the binary.
> Sorry for probably being a noob here but I can't figure out if I'm doing
> something wrong or the binary itself has a problem.
> If I try to just run the bin/netbeans shell script, I get the following
> error:
> WARNING [org.netbeans.core.startup.Main]
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org.netbeans.license.AcceptLicense
> starting from org.netbeans.MainImpl$BootClassLoader@1c20c684 with
> possible defining loaders null and declared parents ]
> at org.netbeans.core.startup.Main.getKlass(Main.java:341)
>
Hm, I apparently was only starting this with ant tryme, which skips the
license dialog :-( so i didn't notice. We need to fix this.
Jan
>
>
> Ate
>
>
> On 2017-11-07 21:49, John McDonnell wrote:
>
>> I want to vote yes, but should the sources be buildable?
>>
>> If I execute ant the build fails?
>>
>> $ ant
>> ...
>> [insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
>> maven.apisupport - at least can't find:
>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
>> alpha/maven.apisupport/build.xml
>> [insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
>> timers - at least can't find:
>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
>> alpha/timers/build.xml
>>
>> BUILD FAILED
>> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-
>> alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:156:
>> Some modules according your cluster config 'basic' are missing from
>> checkout, see messages above.
>>
>> I removed all but 2 of the errors.
>>
>> Am I missing something? If I am then I'll happily vote +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> John
>>
>> On 7 November 2017 at 19:20, Benny Neugebauer <bn...@bennyn.de> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> But the link to the artifact is broken. It should be:
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
>>> netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
>>>
>>> On 2017-11-07 11:17, Geertjan Wielenga <g....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,>
>>>>
>>>> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If
>>>> this>
>>>> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on>
>>>> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
>>>> release>
>>>> this version.>
>>>>
>>>> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache
>>>> NetBeans>
>>>> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the
>>>> NetBeans>
>>>> Platform.>
>>>>
>>>> Build artifacts:>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>> bator-netbeans-release/>
>>>>
>>>> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.>
>>>>
>>>> The artifact to be voted on:>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
>>>> netbeans-platform-source-.zip>
>>>>
>>>> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-
>>>> temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt>
>>>>
>>>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll
>>>> see>
>>>> the NetBeans Platform:>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incu
>>>> bator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/
>>>> netbeans-platform-bin-.zip>
>>>>
>>>> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES%2
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
I get a different build error:
BUILD FAILED
/home/ate/tmp/netbeans/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:122:
Download of
276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC712305A42A-net.java.html.boot.script-1.5.jar
produced content with hash 5DE9DD70EDCD9B30E0671ACC813F6F0C80E951AA when
276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC712305A42A was expected
But disregarding the above, I think a more serious, blocking, issue is
that AFAICT *not* all platform modules have been reviewed yet.
I notice this release candidate includes the apisupport.harness module.
And that still has status "To do". Furthermore, it depends on the *GPL*
external jsearch-2.0_05.jar which is a no-go... for the ASF.
See: https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
I haven't looked in more detail yet, but before spending more time on it
I'd like to know if the inclusion of the harness module is an oversight
which can be quickly fixed. Regardless, I think this should be fixed first.
Note that the binary also includes the jsearch jar.
And while the binary isn't the release itself, if/when a convenience
binary is provided *then* it needs to be in compliance with the
distribution rules. So no GPL artifacts allowed.
I also see the bundled LICENSE and NOTICE files in the binary zip
are a bit weirdly formatted and the NOTICE file in particular.
Seems both are produced by concatenating several files together, but
the result is confusing, especially the NOTICE file.
The NOTICE file should only contain what is needed, nothing
more. Of the current content only the OSGi Alliance notice seems to be
needed, beside the base NOTICE header.
The LICENSE file correctly lists and appends the 3rd party licenses,
but:
a) The jsearch GPL-2-CP license obviously shouldn't be there (see above)
b) The jemmy *external* libraries are available under CDDL or GPL-2-CP,
in which case we simply 'pick' CDDL and don't need to include/append
the GPL-2CP license too.
This is (AFAIK) not blocking, but preferred to remove the GPL-2-CP
license text as it easily can 'trip' casual reviewers or even
automatic license scanning tools which may draw the wrong conclusion.
(and why is jemmy an external dependency and not part of the code
donation?)
Finally, I tried to start the binary.
Sorry for probably being a noob here but I can't figure out if I'm doing
something wrong or the binary itself has a problem.
If I try to just run the bin/netbeans shell script, I get the following
error:
WARNING [org.netbeans.core.startup.Main]
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org.netbeans.license.AcceptLicense
starting from org.netbeans.MainImpl$BootClassLoader@1c20c684 with
possible defining loaders null and declared parents ]
at org.netbeans.core.startup.Main.getKlass(Main.java:341)
Ate
On 2017-11-07 21:49, John McDonnell wrote:
> I want to vote yes, but should the sources be buildable?
>
> If I execute ant the build fails?
>
> $ ant
> ...
> [insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
> maven.apisupport - at least can't find:
> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha/maven.apisupport/build.xml
> [insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
> timers - at least can't find:
> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha/timers/build.xml
>
> BUILD FAILED
> /Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:156:
> Some modules according your cluster config 'basic' are missing from
> checkout, see messages above.
>
> I removed all but 2 of the errors.
>
> Am I missing something? If I am then I'll happily vote +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards
>
> John
>
> On 7 November 2017 at 19:20, Benny Neugebauer <bn...@bennyn.de> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> But the link to the artifact is broken. It should be:
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
>>
>> On 2017-11-07 11:17, Geertjan Wielenga <g....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi all,>
>>>
>>> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this>
>>> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on>
>>> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release>
>>> this version.>
>>>
>>> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans>
>>> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans>
>>> Platform.>
>>>
>>> Build artifacts:>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/>
>>>
>>> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.>
>>>
>>> The artifact to be voted on:>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip>
>>>
>>> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt>
>>>
>>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see>
>>> the NetBeans Platform:>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip>
>>>
>>> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES%2
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by John McDonnell <mc...@gmail.com>.
I want to vote yes, but should the sources be buildable?
If I execute ant the build fails?
$ ant
...
[insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
maven.apisupport - at least can't find:
/Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha/maven.apisupport/build.xml
[insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
timers - at least can't find:
/Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha/timers/build.xml
BUILD FAILED
/Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:156:
Some modules according your cluster config 'basic' are missing from
checkout, see messages above.
I removed all but 2 of the errors.
Am I missing something? If I am then I'll happily vote +1 (non binding)
Regards
John
On 7 November 2017 at 19:20, Benny Neugebauer <bn...@bennyn.de> wrote:
> +1
>
> But the link to the artifact is broken. It should be:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
>
> On 2017-11-07 11:17, Geertjan Wielenga <g....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,>
>>
>> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this>
>> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on>
>> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release>
>> this version.>
>>
>> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans>
>> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans>
>> Platform.>
>>
>> Build artifacts:>
>>
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/>
>>
>> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.>
>>
>> The artifact to be voted on:>
>>
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip>
>>
>> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:>
>>
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt>
>>
>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see>
>> the NetBeans Platform:>
>>
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip>
>>
>> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES%2
--
John
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Benny Neugebauer <bn...@bennyn.de>.
+1
But the link to the artifact is broken. It should be:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
On 2017-11-07 11:17, Geertjan Wielenga <g....@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,>
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If
this>
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on>
> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
release>
> this version.>
>
> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache
NetBeans>
> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the
NetBeans>
> Platform.>
>
> Build artifacts:>
>
>
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/>
>
> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.>
>
> The artifact to be voted on:>
>
>
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip>
>
> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:>
>
>
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt>
>
> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll
see>
> the NetBeans Platform:>
>
>
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip>
>
> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES%2
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Petr Pisl <pe...@oracle.com>.
+1 for Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha.
Petr
On 7.11.2017 11:17, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
> this version.
>
> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> Platform.
>
> Build artifacts:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=Pr8cM-Igx3mlFRFpkpbYfwROcEbeGh4w06KomMX5s_A&m=amU1Uf3hGJm9BCjKFDiCBvEWbj19jui-Bz0mOUnLt0U&s=JkyFF-0tX2KVokdbvqomyX6DLMNGKKMyrVeaaiLqBkU&e=
>
> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>
> The artifact to be voted on:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-2Dsource-2D.zip&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=Pr8cM-Igx3mlFRFpkpbYfwROcEbeGh4w06KomMX5s_A&m=amU1Uf3hGJm9BCjKFDiCBvEWbj19jui-Bz0mOUnLt0U&s=clI3oEMTTWOZe_Z-bL-Sj_ZN1N6Rpb32bOW_yfKaTzA&e=
>
> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_rat-2Dtemp_nbbuild_build_rat-2Dreport.txt&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=Pr8cM-Igx3mlFRFpkpbYfwROcEbeGh4w06KomMX5s_A&m=amU1Uf3hGJm9BCjKFDiCBvEWbj19jui-Bz0mOUnLt0U&s=9c5nVs1IxNo1H7cJjCSzxAfF8uWxHXT-W3_zPN6VWUo&e=
>
> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> the NetBeans Platform:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-2Dbin-2D.zip&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=Pr8cM-Igx3mlFRFpkpbYfwROcEbeGh4w06KomMX5s_A&m=amU1Uf3hGJm9BCjKFDiCBvEWbj19jui-Bz0mOUnLt0U&s=sPomN4vzPohoa0RswcAqYdzlini96NGDV64UcVSX3zI&e=
>
> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
> files.
>
> Please try out the package and vote!
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> NetBeans committer.
>
> Geertjan
> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>.
Understand and sympathize with that perspective. Note though that that
solution also has the potential of someone getting the wrong impression.
Each approach to this is potenially confusing.
Gj
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 at 16:28, Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Almost put 0. I'm only unsure on the subject line - surely we should be
> saying Apache NetBeans Platform 9.0 alpha? Just wary of anyone (away from
> here) getting the wrong impression that this is the first alpha for the
> IDE.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Neil
> --
> Neil C Smith
> Artist & Technologist
> www.neilcsmith.net
>
> Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
Almost put 0. I'm only unsure on the subject line - surely we should be
saying Apache NetBeans Platform 9.0 alpha? Just wary of anyone (away from
here) getting the wrong impression that this is the first alpha for the IDE.
Best wishes,
Neil
--
Neil C Smith
Artist & Technologist
www.neilcsmith.net
Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Tushar Joshi <tu...@apache.org>.
+1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) (binding)
with regards
Tushar
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Gaurav Gupta <ga...@gmail.com>.
+1
Thanks and kind regards,
Gaurav Gupta
<https://twitter.com/ImJeddict> <https://jeddict.github.io/>
<https://www.youtube.com/JPAModeler>
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 7:16 PM, ghader.arkani@gmail.com <
ghader.arkani@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 yes
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by "ghader.arkani@gmail.com" <gh...@gmail.com>.
+1 yes
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Sarvesh Kesharwani <sa...@oracle.com>.
+1
Sarvesh Kesharwani
On 11/7/2017 5:41 PM, Martin Balin wrote:
> +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
>
> Martin Balin
>
> On 7.11.2017 11:17, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
>> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
>> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
>> release
>> this version.
>>
>> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache
>> NetBeans
>> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the
>> NetBeans
>> Platform.
>>
>> Build artifacts:
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=IJ0-jL9XYSi2S-HJ0fAXf2okyCM1T69PNwFeuh2ISik&m=SVHdT-VTyHsSa_5fuyWTXWu9bRpnHNpvQy-ix8mg9dc&s=L-gXOlhEuQnaWT9EtL1p4cRHFuydSF2HkFToXOoRHfg&e=
>>
>>
>> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>>
>> The artifact to be voted on:
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-2Dsource-2D.zip&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=IJ0-jL9XYSi2S-HJ0fAXf2okyCM1T69PNwFeuh2ISik&m=SVHdT-VTyHsSa_5fuyWTXWu9bRpnHNpvQy-ix8mg9dc&s=To8HnEtR6hwUfRt_vgVwMXlaM89z-r6_09ADKbCR9Ag&e=
>>
>>
>> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_rat-2Dtemp_nbbuild_build_rat-2Dreport.txt&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=IJ0-jL9XYSi2S-HJ0fAXf2okyCM1T69PNwFeuh2ISik&m=SVHdT-VTyHsSa_5fuyWTXWu9bRpnHNpvQy-ix8mg9dc&s=okHC45F72tlijyIcisDPAlkpXHGl-_c9DzdlqUXhCIg&e=
>>
>>
>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll
>> see
>> the NetBeans Platform:
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-2Dbin-2D.zip&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=IJ0-jL9XYSi2S-HJ0fAXf2okyCM1T69PNwFeuh2ISik&m=SVHdT-VTyHsSa_5fuyWTXWu9bRpnHNpvQy-ix8mg9dc&s=akLr8YCwHZSRHlazX8QUIwTHL1I0K2eu5FDMRh4QgMw&e=
>>
>>
>> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and
>> NOTICE
>> files.
>>
>> Please try out the package and vote!
>>
>> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary
>> number of
>> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
>> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>
>> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
>> NetBeans committer.
>>
>> Geertjan
>> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Martin Balin <Ma...@oracle.com>.
+1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Martin Balin
On 7.11.2017 11:17, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
> this version.
>
> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> Platform.
>
> Build artifacts:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=IJ0-jL9XYSi2S-HJ0fAXf2okyCM1T69PNwFeuh2ISik&m=SVHdT-VTyHsSa_5fuyWTXWu9bRpnHNpvQy-ix8mg9dc&s=L-gXOlhEuQnaWT9EtL1p4cRHFuydSF2HkFToXOoRHfg&e=
>
> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>
> The artifact to be voted on:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-2Dsource-2D.zip&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=IJ0-jL9XYSi2S-HJ0fAXf2okyCM1T69PNwFeuh2ISik&m=SVHdT-VTyHsSa_5fuyWTXWu9bRpnHNpvQy-ix8mg9dc&s=To8HnEtR6hwUfRt_vgVwMXlaM89z-r6_09ADKbCR9Ag&e=
>
> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_rat-2Dtemp_nbbuild_build_rat-2Dreport.txt&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=IJ0-jL9XYSi2S-HJ0fAXf2okyCM1T69PNwFeuh2ISik&m=SVHdT-VTyHsSa_5fuyWTXWu9bRpnHNpvQy-ix8mg9dc&s=okHC45F72tlijyIcisDPAlkpXHGl-_c9DzdlqUXhCIg&e=
>
> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> the NetBeans Platform:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-2Dbin-2D.zip&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=IJ0-jL9XYSi2S-HJ0fAXf2okyCM1T69PNwFeuh2ISik&m=SVHdT-VTyHsSa_5fuyWTXWu9bRpnHNpvQy-ix8mg9dc&s=akLr8YCwHZSRHlazX8QUIwTHL1I0K2eu5FDMRh4QgMw&e=
>
> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
> files.
>
> Please try out the package and vote!
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> NetBeans committer.
>
> Geertjan
> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>.
Ah, probably left out the -Dcluster.config=platform bit.
Thanks,
Gj
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Great. And, what were you doing wrong?
>
> Gj
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:18 PM, John McDonnell <mc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Looked at the README from the git repo saw what I was doing wrong.
>>
>>
>> So happy to give this a:
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7 November 2017 at 20:36, Jiří Kovalský <ji...@oracle.com>
>> wrote:
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > Let's speed up the Alpha and Beta releases as much as possible.
>> >
>> > -Jirka
>> >
>> > Dne 7.11.2017 v 19:10 Emilian Bold napsal(a):
>> >
>> >> +1 (binding)
>> >>
>> >> Minor remarks:
>> >>
>> >> DEPENDENCIES lists stuff from another NetBeans repository. I don't
>> believe
>> >> we should list our own code as dependency.
>> >>
>> >> LICENSE file. A bit odd how the Apache license is shown in a code
>> block,
>> >> but nothing wrong with it. Not sure why we ship jemmy (and the jemmy
>> src and
>> >> the jemmy doc) with the platform.
>> >>
>> >> NOTICE file. Our own html4j binaries should not be Copyright 2017
>> NetBeans
>> >> but Copyright 2017 the ASF?
>> >>
>> >> --emi
>> >>
>> >>> -------- Original Message --------
>> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
>> >>> Local Time: November 7, 2017 7:27 PM
>> >>> UTC Time: November 7, 2017 5:27 PM
>> >>> From: toni.epple@eppleton.de
>> >>> To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>> +1
>> >>>
>> >>> Am 07.11.17, 11:17 schrieb "Geertjan Wielenga"
>> >>> geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi all,
>> >>>
>> >>> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If
>> this
>> >>> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
>> >>> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
>> release
>> >>> this version.
>> >>>
>> >>> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache
>> NetBeans
>> >>> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the
>> NetBeans
>> >>> Platform.
>> >>>
>> >>> Build artifacts:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> [https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
>> builds.apache.org_view_Incubator&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvl
>> ZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz4
>> 0jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&
>> s=748eVgTzSDEnaraAf78rNZ7tbFwIoF62RDr2KJN88Ps&e=
>> >>> Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/](https://urldefense
>> .proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_
>> view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-
>> 2Drelease_&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eap
>> I_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=
>> qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=sRaYH4A53T83Kp
>> M1HE7BuZxMHerlgpNF8E0o6VnFgR8&e=)
>> >>>
>> >>> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>> >>>
>> >>> The artifact to be voted on:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> [https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
>> builds.apache.org_view_Incubator&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvl
>> ZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz4
>> 0jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&
>> s=748eVgTzSDEnaraAf78rNZ7tbFwIoF62RDr2KJN88Ps&e=
>> >>> Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/
>> artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip](https://
>> urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.
>> org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_
>> lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-
>> 2Dsource-2D.zip&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB
>> 65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=
>> qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=fL4DnyD_
>> OiKA4Co_z7xdhoDUWPFlt1hYs7xo1jCPhKY&e=)
>> >>>
>> >>> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> [https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
>> builds.apache.org_view_Incubator&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvl
>> ZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz4
>> 0jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&
>> s=748eVgTzSDEnaraAf78rNZ7tbFwIoF62RDr2KJN88Ps&e=
>> >>> Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/
>> artifact/rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt](https://
>> urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.o
>> rg_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-
>> 2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_rat-2Dtemp_nbbuild_
>> build_rat-2Dreport.txt&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8P
>> Zh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU
>> 133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=sTZ
>> wZYlR2trhXOiun0d7jJxgfNcx2vyxJT2601vD85A&e=)
>> >>>
>> >>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll
>> see
>> >>> the NetBeans Platform:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> [https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
>> builds.apache.org_view_Incubator&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvl
>> ZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz4
>> 0jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&
>> s=748eVgTzSDEnaraAf78rNZ7tbFwIoF62RDr2KJN88Ps&e=
>> >>> Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/
>> artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip](https://
>> urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.
>> org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_
>> lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-
>> 2Dbin-2D.zip&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65e
>> apI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=
>> qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=AA3ub2IaJUnkEr
>> kNMybpr-o3Aw_JgsrZ3dIGQq78n0s&e=)
>> >>>
>> >>> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and
>> >>> NOTICE
>> >>> files.
>> >>>
>> >>> Please try out the package and vote!
>> >>>
>> >>> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary
>> number
>> >>> of
>> >>> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>> >>>
>> >>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
>> >>> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
>> >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> >>>
>> >>> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an
>> Apache
>> >>> NetBeans committer.
>> >>>
>> >>> Geertjan
>> >>> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> John
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>.
Great. And, what were you doing wrong?
Gj
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:18 PM, John McDonnell <mc...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Looked at the README from the git repo saw what I was doing wrong.
>
>
> So happy to give this a:
> +1 (non binding)
>
>
>
> On 7 November 2017 at 20:36, Jiří Kovalský <ji...@oracle.com>
> wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Let's speed up the Alpha and Beta releases as much as possible.
> >
> > -Jirka
> >
> > Dne 7.11.2017 v 19:10 Emilian Bold napsal(a):
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> Minor remarks:
> >>
> >> DEPENDENCIES lists stuff from another NetBeans repository. I don't
> believe
> >> we should list our own code as dependency.
> >>
> >> LICENSE file. A bit odd how the Apache license is shown in a code block,
> >> but nothing wrong with it. Not sure why we ship jemmy (and the jemmy
> src and
> >> the jemmy doc) with the platform.
> >>
> >> NOTICE file. Our own html4j binaries should not be Copyright 2017
> NetBeans
> >> but Copyright 2017 the ASF?
> >>
> >> --emi
> >>
> >>> -------- Original Message --------
> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> >>> Local Time: November 7, 2017 7:27 PM
> >>> UTC Time: November 7, 2017 5:27 PM
> >>> From: toni.epple@eppleton.de
> >>> To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> Am 07.11.17, 11:17 schrieb "Geertjan Wielenga"
> >>> geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If
> this
> >>> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> >>> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
> release
> >>> this version.
> >>>
> >>> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache
> NetBeans
> >>> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the
> NetBeans
> >>> Platform.
> >>>
> >>> Build artifacts:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator&d=DwIGaQ&c=
> RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_
> Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_
> NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=748eVgTzSDEnaraAf78rNZ7tbFwIoF62RDr2KJN88Ps&e=
> >>> Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/](https://
> urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.
> org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_&d=
> DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_
> Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_
> NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=sRaYH4A53T83KpM1HE7BuZxMHerlgpNF8E0o6VnFgR8&e=
> )
> >>>
> >>> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
> >>>
> >>> The artifact to be voted on:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator&d=DwIGaQ&c=
> RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_
> Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_
> NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=748eVgTzSDEnaraAf78rNZ7tbFwIoF62RDr2KJN88Ps&e=
> >>> Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip](https://urldefense.
> proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_
> Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-
> 2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-
> 2Dplatform-2Dsource-2D.zip&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIr
> MUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_
> 90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=fL4DnyD_OiKA4Co_
> z7xdhoDUWPFlt1hYs7xo1jCPhKY&e=)
> >>>
> >>> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator&d=DwIGaQ&c=
> RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_
> Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_
> NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=748eVgTzSDEnaraAf78rNZ7tbFwIoF62RDr2KJN88Ps&e=
> >>> Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt](https://
> urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.
> org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_
> lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_rat-2Dtemp_nbbuild_build_rat-
> 2Dreport.txt&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_
> Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_
> NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=sTZwZYlR2trhXOiun0d7jJxgfNcx2vyxJT2601vD85A&e=
> )
> >>>
> >>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll
> see
> >>> the NetBeans Platform:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator&d=DwIGaQ&c=
> RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_
> Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_
> NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=748eVgTzSDEnaraAf78rNZ7tbFwIoF62RDr2KJN88Ps&e=
> >>> Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip](https://urldefense.
> proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_
> Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-
> 2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-
> 2Dplatform-2Dbin-2D.zip&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIr
> MUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_
> 90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=AA3ub2IaJUnkErkNMybpr-o3Aw_
> JgsrZ3dIGQq78n0s&e=)
> >>>
> >>> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and
> >>> NOTICE
> >>> files.
> >>>
> >>> Please try out the package and vote!
> >>>
> >>> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary
> number
> >>> of
> >>> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> >>> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >>>
> >>> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> >>> NetBeans committer.
> >>>
> >>> Geertjan
> >>> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>
>
>
> --
> John
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by John McDonnell <mc...@gmail.com>.
Looked at the README from the git repo saw what I was doing wrong.
So happy to give this a:
+1 (non binding)
On 7 November 2017 at 20:36, Jiří Kovalský <ji...@oracle.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Let's speed up the Alpha and Beta releases as much as possible.
>
> -Jirka
>
> Dne 7.11.2017 v 19:10 Emilian Bold napsal(a):
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Minor remarks:
>>
>> DEPENDENCIES lists stuff from another NetBeans repository. I don't believe
>> we should list our own code as dependency.
>>
>> LICENSE file. A bit odd how the Apache license is shown in a code block,
>> but nothing wrong with it. Not sure why we ship jemmy (and the jemmy src and
>> the jemmy doc) with the platform.
>>
>> NOTICE file. Our own html4j binaries should not be Copyright 2017 NetBeans
>> but Copyright 2017 the ASF?
>>
>> --emi
>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
>>> Local Time: November 7, 2017 7:27 PM
>>> UTC Time: November 7, 2017 5:27 PM
>>> From: toni.epple@eppleton.de
>>> To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Am 07.11.17, 11:17 schrieb "Geertjan Wielenga"
>>> geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
>>> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
>>> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
>>> this version.
>>>
>>> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
>>> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
>>> Platform.
>>>
>>> Build artifacts:
>>>
>>>
>>> [https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=748eVgTzSDEnaraAf78rNZ7tbFwIoF62RDr2KJN88Ps&e=
>>> Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=sRaYH4A53T83KpM1HE7BuZxMHerlgpNF8E0o6VnFgR8&e=)
>>>
>>> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>>>
>>> The artifact to be voted on:
>>>
>>>
>>> [https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=748eVgTzSDEnaraAf78rNZ7tbFwIoF62RDr2KJN88Ps&e=
>>> Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-2Dsource-2D.zip&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=fL4DnyD_OiKA4Co_z7xdhoDUWPFlt1hYs7xo1jCPhKY&e=)
>>>
>>> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>>>
>>>
>>> [https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=748eVgTzSDEnaraAf78rNZ7tbFwIoF62RDr2KJN88Ps&e=
>>> Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_rat-2Dtemp_nbbuild_build_rat-2Dreport.txt&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=sTZwZYlR2trhXOiun0d7jJxgfNcx2vyxJT2601vD85A&e=)
>>>
>>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
>>> the NetBeans Platform:
>>>
>>>
>>> [https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=748eVgTzSDEnaraAf78rNZ7tbFwIoF62RDr2KJN88Ps&e=
>>> Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-2Dbin-2D.zip&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=AA3ub2IaJUnkErkNMybpr-o3Aw_JgsrZ3dIGQq78n0s&e=)
>>>
>>> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and
>>> NOTICE
>>> files.
>>>
>>> Please try out the package and vote!
>>>
>>> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number
>>> of
>>> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
>>> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>
>>> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
>>> NetBeans committer.
>>>
>>> Geertjan
>>> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
--
John
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Jiří Kovalský <ji...@oracle.com>.
+1 (binding)
Let's speed up the Alpha and Beta releases as much as possible.
-Jirka
Dne 7.11.2017 v 19:10 Emilian Bold napsal(a):
> +1 (binding)
>
> Minor remarks:
>
> DEPENDENCIES lists stuff from another NetBeans repository. I don't believe we should list our own code as dependency.
>
> LICENSE file. A bit odd how the Apache license is shown in a code block, but nothing wrong with it. Not sure why we ship jemmy (and the jemmy src and the jemmy doc) with the platform.
>
> NOTICE file. Our own html4j binaries should not be Copyright 2017 NetBeans but Copyright 2017 the ASF?
>
> --emi
>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
>> Local Time: November 7, 2017 7:27 PM
>> UTC Time: November 7, 2017 5:27 PM
>> From: toni.epple@eppleton.de
>> To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Am 07.11.17, 11:17 schrieb "Geertjan Wielenga" geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
>> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
>> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
>> this version.
>>
>> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
>> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
>> Platform.
>>
>> Build artifacts:
>>
>> [https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=748eVgTzSDEnaraAf78rNZ7tbFwIoF62RDr2KJN88Ps&e= Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=sRaYH4A53T83KpM1HE7BuZxMHerlgpNF8E0o6VnFgR8&e=)
>>
>> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>>
>> The artifact to be voted on:
>>
>> [https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=748eVgTzSDEnaraAf78rNZ7tbFwIoF62RDr2KJN88Ps&e= Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-2Dsource-2D.zip&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=fL4DnyD_OiKA4Co_z7xdhoDUWPFlt1hYs7xo1jCPhKY&e=)
>>
>> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>>
>> [https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=748eVgTzSDEnaraAf78rNZ7tbFwIoF62RDr2KJN88Ps&e= Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_rat-2Dtemp_nbbuild_build_rat-2Dreport.txt&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=sTZwZYlR2trhXOiun0d7jJxgfNcx2vyxJT2601vD85A&e=)
>>
>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
>> the NetBeans Platform:
>>
>> [https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=748eVgTzSDEnaraAf78rNZ7tbFwIoF62RDr2KJN88Ps&e= Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_Incubator-2520Projects_job_incubator-2Dnetbeans-2Drelease_lastSuccessfulBuild_artifact_dist_netbeans-2Dplatform-2Dbin-2D.zip&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=8_Pz0x0SKeT5e3IehhQKCbQ2xl3tz40jnCU133NrdP4&m=qUQUuEw2ebM_90jpi_NzlbWpMwBucLJGXEsVNrYjUPM&s=AA3ub2IaJUnkErkNMybpr-o3Aw_JgsrZ3dIGQq78n0s&e=)
>>
>> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
>> files.
>>
>> Please try out the package and vote!
>>
>> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
>> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
>> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>
>> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
>> NetBeans committer.
>>
>> Geertjan
>> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Emilian Bold <em...@protonmail.ch>.
+1 (binding)
Minor remarks:
DEPENDENCIES lists stuff from another NetBeans repository. I don't believe we should list our own code as dependency.
LICENSE file. A bit odd how the Apache license is shown in a code block, but nothing wrong with it. Not sure why we ship jemmy (and the jemmy src and the jemmy doc) with the platform.
NOTICE file. Our own html4j binaries should not be Copyright 2017 NetBeans but Copyright 2017 the ASF?
--emi
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> Local Time: November 7, 2017 7:27 PM
> UTC Time: November 7, 2017 5:27 PM
> From: toni.epple@eppleton.de
> To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
> +1
>
> Am 07.11.17, 11:17 schrieb "Geertjan Wielenga" geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
> this version.
>
> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> Platform.
>
> Build artifacts:
>
> [https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/](https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/)
>
> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>
> The artifact to be voted on:
>
> [https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip](https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip)
>
> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>
> [https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt](https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt)
>
> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> the NetBeans Platform:
>
> [https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip](https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip)
>
> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
> files.
>
> Please try out the package and vote!
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> NetBeans committer.
>
> Geertjan
> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Anton Epple <to...@eppleton.de>.
+1
Am 07.11.17, 11:17 schrieb "Geertjan Wielenga" <ge...@googlemail.com>:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
this version.
Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
Platform.
Build artifacts:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/
Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
The artifact to be voted on:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
the NetBeans Platform:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
files.
Please try out the package and vote!
The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
NetBeans committer.
Geertjan
on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Ricardo Pacheco <ri...@gmail.com>.
+1
El nov. 7, 2017 6:28 PM, "Attila Kelemen" <at...@gmail.com>
escribió:
+1 (binding)
2017-11-07 11:17 GMT+01:00 Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
> this version.
>
> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> Platform.
>
> Build artifacts:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/
>
> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>
> The artifact to be voted on:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
>
> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
>
> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> the NetBeans Platform:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
>
> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and
NOTICE
> files.
>
> Please try out the package and vote!
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number
of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> NetBeans committer.
>
> Geertjan
> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Posted by Attila Kelemen <at...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
2017-11-07 11:17 GMT+01:00 Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> general@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
> this version.
>
> Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) are the modules of Apache NetBeans
> that provide the application framework of NetBeans, that is, the NetBeans
> Platform.
>
> Build artifacts:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/
>
> Source md5sum is 548058644764a07ef54568aa79a10aa1.
>
> The artifact to be voted on:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-source-.zip
>
> Rat report shows no unknown licenses:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> rat-temp/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
>
> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> the NetBeans Platform:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> dist/netbeans-platform-bin-.zip
>
> Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE
> files.
>
> Please try out the package and vote!
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding, i.e., you are an Apache
> NetBeans committer.
>
> Geertjan
> on behalf of the Apache NetBeans tea,
>