You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by Patrick Linskey <pl...@bea.com> on 2006/10/07 02:25:20 UTC
version number increment
Hi,
We (BEA) are going to be releasing a new version of Kodo based on the
OpenJPA jars at some point soon. We'd kinda like to bump up the version
number to 0.9.1 along with the build that we're using; any objections to
this?
Actually, I can't remember what the maven convention is. Is
0.9.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT something that is building towards 0.9.0, or
something that is built on top of 0.9.0?
If the former, then we'd like to change the version number to
0.9.0-incubating at the time of release and move it to
0.9.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT immediately afterwards.
If the latter, then we'd like to change the version number to
0.9.1-incubating at the time of release and move it to
0.9.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT immediately afterwards.
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
Re: version number increment
Posted by Marc Prud'hommeaux <mp...@apache.org>.
OpenJPA Folk-
OK, I've gone ahead and made a final non-snapshot "0.9.0-incubating"
release, and bumped the current release number up to "0.9.5-
incubating-SNAPSHOT". The former release can be useful for people
wanting a stable, unchanging release.
I've updated the wiki at http://cwiki.apache.org/openjpa/
obtaining.html with examples for using both the 0.9.0-incubating
release and the 0.9.5-incubating-SNAPSHOT snapshot release.
On Oct 6, 2006, at 5:31 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Oct 6, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We (BEA) are going to be releasing a new version of Kodo based on the
>> OpenJPA jars at some point soon. We'd kinda like to bump up the
>> version
>> number to 0.9.1 along with the build that we're using; any
>> objections to
>> this?
>>
>> Actually, I can't remember what the maven convention is. Is
>> 0.9.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT something that is building towards
>> 0.9.0, or
>> something that is built on top of 0.9.0?
>
> I know how at least one other project does it: 0.9.0-incubating-
> SNAPSHOT is on its way to becoming 0.9.0-incubating.
>>
>> If the former, then we'd like to change the version number to
>> 0.9.0-incubating at the time of release and move it to
>> 0.9.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT immediately afterwards.
>
> +1
>
> Craig
>>
>> If the latter, then we'd like to change the version number to
>> 0.9.1-incubating at the time of release and move it to
>> 0.9.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT immediately afterwards.
>>
>> -Patrick
>>
>> --
>> Patrick Linskey
>> BEA Systems, Inc.
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> __
>> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may
>> contain
>> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and
>> affiliated
>> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted
>> and/or
>> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
>> individual
>> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
>> recipient,
>> and have received this message in error, please immediately return
>> this
>> by email and then delete it.
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Re: version number increment
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Patrick,
On Oct 6, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We (BEA) are going to be releasing a new version of Kodo based on the
> OpenJPA jars at some point soon. We'd kinda like to bump up the
> version
> number to 0.9.1 along with the build that we're using; any
> objections to
> this?
>
> Actually, I can't remember what the maven convention is. Is
> 0.9.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT something that is building towards 0.9.0, or
> something that is built on top of 0.9.0?
I know how at least one other project does it: 0.9.0-incubating-
SNAPSHOT is on its way to becoming 0.9.0-incubating.
>
> If the former, then we'd like to change the version number to
> 0.9.0-incubating at the time of release and move it to
> 0.9.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT immediately afterwards.
+1
Craig
>
> If the latter, then we'd like to change the version number to
> 0.9.1-incubating at the time of release and move it to
> 0.9.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT immediately afterwards.
>
> -Patrick
>
> --
> Patrick Linskey
> BEA Systems, Inc.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may
> contain
> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and
> affiliated
> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted
> and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
> individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
> recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return
> this
> by email and then delete it.
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: version number increment
Posted by robert burrell donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On 10/7/06, Marc Prud'hommeaux <mp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> My personal understanding is that 0.9.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT is
> building towards 0.9.0-incubating, so I think your first scenario is
> correct.
+1
> It would be good if an Apache expect would confirm this, though.
<incubator-pmc-hat>
decisions like this are delegated
</incubator-pmc-hat>
:-)
- robert
Re: version number increment
Posted by Marc Prud'hommeaux <mp...@apache.org>.
My personal understanding is that 0.9.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT is
building towards 0.9.0-incubating, so I think your first scenario is
correct.
It would be good if an Apache expect would confirm this, though.
On Oct 6, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We (BEA) are going to be releasing a new version of Kodo based on the
> OpenJPA jars at some point soon. We'd kinda like to bump up the
> version
> number to 0.9.1 along with the build that we're using; any
> objections to
> this?
>
> Actually, I can't remember what the maven convention is. Is
> 0.9.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT something that is building towards 0.9.0, or
> something that is built on top of 0.9.0?
>
> If the former, then we'd like to change the version number to
> 0.9.0-incubating at the time of release and move it to
> 0.9.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT immediately afterwards.
>
> If the latter, then we'd like to change the version number to
> 0.9.1-incubating at the time of release and move it to
> 0.9.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT immediately afterwards.
>
> -Patrick
>
> --
> Patrick Linskey
> BEA Systems, Inc.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may
> contain
> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and
> affiliated
> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted
> and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
> individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
> recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return
> this
> by email and then delete it.