You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@shardingsphere.apache.org by "terrymanu (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2026/10/18 06:30:34 UTC
[PR] Enforce independent paired reviews and substantive result reconciliation [shardingsphere]
terrymanu opened a new pull request, #40217:
URL: https://github.com/apache/shardingsphere/pull/40217
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@shardingsphere.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Enforce independent paired reviews and substantive result reconciliation [shardingsphere]
Posted by "terrymanu (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
terrymanu merged PR #40217:
URL: https://github.com/apache/shardingsphere/pull/40217
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@shardingsphere.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Enforce independent paired reviews and substantive result reconciliation [shardingsphere]
Posted by "terrymanu (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
terrymanu commented on PR #40217:
URL: https://github.com/apache/shardingsphere/pull/40217#issuecomment-6246583545
### Result
Review Result: Mergeable
No blocking issues or recommended changes remain. Both independent complete reviews agree, and the coordinator’s substantive review supports that conclusion.
### Evidence
All 68 ledger tests passed. Each reviewer independently reran and passed the 14 new tests against the current source.
All 50 source-reading checks passed. Each of the four new semantic cases received two passing confirmations.
Failures in the initial semantic samples were preserved and assessed through bounded baseline comparison; no regression was confirmed.
Original results and ledgers remained frozen. All candidate dispositions, counter-evidence, and evidence versions were checked. validate-session passed.
### Coverage
Standalone local candidate, reviewed from the original task baseline:
525835a0702dc89d16dfe83f28d69a70d04b1fca.
All 14 changed blocks across the four authorized files were covered:
review-pr/SKILL.md, scripts/review_ledger.py,
tests/test_review_ledger.py, and harness/agents/cases.toml.
The review followed the user-approved requirements for independent paired reviews, mandatory result review, historical candidate preservation, and a maximum of two pairs, while preserving existing proof and decision rules.
Coverage included coordination, session validation, regression tests, and policy cases.
Completed the root-cause, blast-radius, and tests-runtime discovery lenses, an independent defensive-code audit, and convergence checks.
One isolated review pair and the coordinator’s result review completed. Both confirmed issue sets and evidence-gap sets were empty, with no unresolved differences.
This was a Code Correctness Review; CI was not reviewed.
Spotless and Checkstyle do not cover the changed file types. RAT was not triggered.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@shardingsphere.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org