You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Gary D. Gregory (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2026/03/13 12:49:00 UTC
[jira] [Closed] (NET-736) Refactored test in SubnetUtilsTest to use parameterized unit testing to reduce duplication and improve maintainability
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Gary D. Gregory closed NET-736.
-------------------------------
Resolution: Not A Problem
PR closed.
> Refactored test in SubnetUtilsTest to use parameterized unit testing to reduce duplication and improve maintainability
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NET-736
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-736
> Project: Commons Net
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.11.1
> Reporter: Monil Narang
> Priority: Major
>
> *Aim:*
> Improve the test code by avoiding code duplication, improving maintainability, and enhancing readability. By converting the test into a parameterized unit test, we reduce boilerplate code, make it easier to extend by simply adding new input values, and improve debugging by clearly identifying which test case fails instead of searching through individual assertions.
> {code:java}
> @Test
> public void testNET641() {
> assertFalse(new SubnetUtils("192.168.1.0/00").getInfo().isInRange("0.0.0.0"));
> assertFalse(new SubnetUtils("192.168.1.0/30").getInfo().isInRange("0.0.0.0"));
> assertFalse(new SubnetUtils("192.168.1.0/31").getInfo().isInRange("0.0.0.0"));
> assertFalse(new SubnetUtils("192.168.1.0/32").getInfo().isInRange("0.0.0.0"));
> }
> {code}
> In the above in SubnetUtilsTest.java:
> 1. The same method call new SubnetUtils(...).getInfo().isInRange(...) is repeated multiple times with different inputs, making the test harder to maintain and extend.
> 2. When a test fails, JUnit only shows which assertion failed, but not which specific input caused the failure.
> 3. Adding new test cases requires copying and pasting another assertFalse(...) statement instead of simply adding new data.
> To accomplish this, I have retrofitted the test into a parameterized unit test. This reduces duplication, allows easy extension by simply adding new value sets, and makes debugging easier as it clearly indicates which test failed instead of requiring a search through individual assertions.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)