You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> on 2010/10/25 03:42:01 UTC
[VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Here we go again.
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
vote good for 72 hours.
+1 here.
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Sebastian Schelter <ss...@apache.org>.
+1
On 25.10.2010 15:04, Sean Owen wrote:
> The text is...
>
> 21 October 2010 - Apache Mahout 0.4 released
>
> We are pleased to announce release 0.4 of Mahout. Virtually every corner of
> the project has changed, and significantly, since 0.3. Developers are
> invited to use and depend on version 0.4 even as yet more change is to be
> expected before the next release. Highlights include:
>
> - Model refactoring and CLI changes to improve integration and
> consistency
> - New ClusterEvaluator and CDbwClusterEvaluator offer new ways to
> evaluate clustering effectiveness
> - New Spectral Clustering and MinHash Clustering (still experimental)
> - New VectorModelClassifier allows any set of clusters to be used for
> classification
> - Map/Reduce job to compute the pairwise similarities of the rows of a
> matrix using a customizable similarity measure
> - Map/Reduce job to compute the item-item-similarities for item-based
> collaborative filtering
> - RecommenderJob has been evolved to a fully distributed item-based
> recommender
> - Distributed Lanczos SVD implementation
> - More support for distributed operations on very large matrices
> - Easier access to Mahout operations via the command line
> - New HMM based sequence classification from GSoC (currently as
> sequential version only and still experimental)
> - Sequential logistic regression training framework
> - New SGD classifier
> - Experimental new type of NB classifier, and feature reduction options
> for existing one
> - New vector encoding framework for high speed vectorization without a
> pre-built dictionary
> - Additional elements of supervised model evaluation framework
> - Promoted several pieces of old Colt framework to tested status (QR
> decomposition, in particular)
> - Can now save random forests and use it to classify new data
> - Many, many small fixes, improvements, refactorings and cleanup
>
> Details on what's included can be found in the release
> notes<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310751&styleName=Html&version=12314281>.
> Downloads are available from theApache
> Mirrors<http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/mahout/>
> .
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Grant Ingersoll<gs...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>
>> +1
>>
>> Do we have the release text ready to go? Do we want to do a press release
>> with the ASF?
>>
>> Small nits:
>>
>> Why is there NOTICE and NOTICE.txt in the big tarball?
>>
>> On Oct 24, 2010, at 9:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Here we go again.
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
>>>
>>> This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
>>>
>>> vote good for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> +1 here.
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
The text is...
21 October 2010 - Apache Mahout 0.4 released
We are pleased to announce release 0.4 of Mahout. Virtually every corner of
the project has changed, and significantly, since 0.3. Developers are
invited to use and depend on version 0.4 even as yet more change is to be
expected before the next release. Highlights include:
- Model refactoring and CLI changes to improve integration and
consistency
- New ClusterEvaluator and CDbwClusterEvaluator offer new ways to
evaluate clustering effectiveness
- New Spectral Clustering and MinHash Clustering (still experimental)
- New VectorModelClassifier allows any set of clusters to be used for
classification
- Map/Reduce job to compute the pairwise similarities of the rows of a
matrix using a customizable similarity measure
- Map/Reduce job to compute the item-item-similarities for item-based
collaborative filtering
- RecommenderJob has been evolved to a fully distributed item-based
recommender
- Distributed Lanczos SVD implementation
- More support for distributed operations on very large matrices
- Easier access to Mahout operations via the command line
- New HMM based sequence classification from GSoC (currently as
sequential version only and still experimental)
- Sequential logistic regression training framework
- New SGD classifier
- Experimental new type of NB classifier, and feature reduction options
for existing one
- New vector encoding framework for high speed vectorization without a
pre-built dictionary
- Additional elements of supervised model evaluation framework
- Promoted several pieces of old Colt framework to tested status (QR
decomposition, in particular)
- Can now save random forests and use it to classify new data
- Many, many small fixes, improvements, refactorings and cleanup
Details on what's included can be found in the release
notes<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310751&styleName=Html&version=12314281>.
Downloads are available from theApache
Mirrors<http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/mahout/>
.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>wrote:
> +1
>
> Do we have the release text ready to go? Do we want to do a press release
> with the ASF?
>
> Small nits:
>
> Why is there NOTICE and NOTICE.txt in the big tarball?
>
> On Oct 24, 2010, at 9:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> > Here we go again.
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
> >
> > This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
> >
> > vote good for 72 hours.
> >
> > +1 here.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Isabel Drost <is...@apache.org>.
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
> Do we want to do a press release with the ASF?
+1 to the press release - what's needed for this?
Note: Intentionally not voting on the release just yet as I don't get
to checking the artifacts. To do at least something for it, I just
pinged heise: They are interested in including an article on our
release on their Newsticker. I'll take care of forwarding release notes
etc. and pinging them when we are done if that is ok with you.
Isabel
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
+1
Do we have the release text ready to go? Do we want to do a press release with the ASF?
Small nits:
Why is there NOTICE and NOTICE.txt in the big tarball?
On Oct 24, 2010, at 9:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Here we go again.
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
>
> This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
>
> vote good for 72 hours.
>
> +1 here.
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
You're not looking in the right place.
The 'bin' directory is created as part of the distribution by the
assembly plugin.
Look in distribution/target at the various outputs, and you'll find
bin directories in them.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
> Followed the instructions in wiki BuildingMahout, but still no bin directory. Tried running mvn install -Prelease from top level. It took longer but still no bin directory. The wiki pages suggest mvn install should be sufficient to be able to run $MAHOUT_HOME/bin/mahout but with no bin directory...
>
> What is the correct mvn incantation to build bin? At minimum, the wiki needs to reflect this.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:40 AM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>
> mvn install doesn't make a bin directory.
>
> If your goal is a disrtro, you need -Prelease.
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jeff Eastman
> <jd...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote:
>> On 10/24/10 6:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>
>>> Here we go again.
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
>>>
>>> This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
>>>
>>> vote good for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> +1 here.
>>>
>> I unpacked the new bits and the mvn install went ok, but after there is no
>> bin directory.
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
This had me confused as well, btw. I found it by just looking at what maven
had created most recently but it wasn't obvious.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>wrote:
> If you download what's in mahout-distribution under the link Benson sent,
> you get a bin directory.
>
> On Oct 25, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
>
> > Followed the instructions in wiki BuildingMahout, but still no bin
> directory. Tried running mvn install -Prelease from top level. It took
> longer but still no bin directory. The wiki pages suggest mvn install should
> be sufficient to be able to run $MAHOUT_HOME/bin/mahout but with no bin
> directory...
> >
> > What is the correct mvn incantation to build bin? At minimum, the wiki
> needs to reflect this.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:40 AM
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
> >
> > mvn install doesn't make a bin directory.
> >
> > If your goal is a disrtro, you need -Prelease.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jeff Eastman
> > <jd...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote:
> >> On 10/24/10 6:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Here we go again.
> >>>
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
> >>>
> >>> This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
> >>>
> >>> vote good for 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> +1 here.
> >>>
> >> I unpacked the new bits and the mvn install went ok, but after there is
> no
> >> bin directory.
> >>
>
> --------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
> I don't even have mahout-distribution-0.5-SNAPSHOT in mahout/distribution/target, just the -0.4- files (which are empty). Sorry but for technical reasons I won't be able to post the ls -R until I get home tonite, but it does not contain any bin directories either.
>
> I do notice that checking out from trunk produces a mahout/bin directory. Building from the distribution as below does not. I would think it should, else the wiki instructions should be corrected for folks using our source distribution.
I'd expect a 4, not a 5, but otherwise I'm stumped.
I'll check out the tag and see what I set.
RE: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Jeff Eastman <je...@Narus.com>.
I don't even have mahout-distribution-0.5-SNAPSHOT in mahout/distribution/target, just the -0.4- files (which are empty). Sorry but for technical reasons I won't be able to post the ls -R until I get home tonite, but it does not contain any bin directories either.
I do notice that checking out from trunk produces a mahout/bin directory. Building from the distribution as below does not. I would think it should, else the wiki instructions should be corrected for folks using our source distribution.
-----Original Message-----
From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:56 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Here's where the bin dir arrives in my tree when I run a -Prelease build.
/Users/benson/asf/mahout/distribution/target ls
mahout-distribution-0.5-SNAPSHOT/mahout-distribution-0.5-SNAPSHOT
bin mahout-core-0.5-SNAPSHOT-job.jar mahout-math-0.4.jar
conf mahout-core-0.5-SNAPSHOT.jar mahout-math-0.5-SNAPSHOT.jar
docs mahout-examples-0.4-job.jar mahout-taste-webapp-0.4.war
lib mahout-examples-0.4.jar mahout-taste-webapp-0.5-SNAPSHOT.war
mahout-core-0.4-job.jar mahout-examples-0.5-SNAPSHOT-job.jar mahout-utils-0.4.jar
mahout-core-0.4.jar mahout-examples-0.5-SNAPSHOT.jar mahout-utils-0.5-SNAPSHOT.jar
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
> Ok, I'm frustrated too. The Quick Start instructions in the Wiki (BuildingMahout) say only to run "mvn install" from the checked-out directory. They say nothing about adding -Prelease, but even adding that to the top-level "mvn install -Prelease" does not produce a build with a bin directory. And, there is no bin directory in distribution/target directory either. It should not be this difficult.
>
> If the procedure detailed in the wiki does not produce a bin directory at $MAHOUT_HOME, then all of the examples which refer to $MAHOUT_HOME/bin/mahout ... will fail too.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:05 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>
> If you build with -Prelease, you should find the bin directory hiding
> down in distribution/target.
>
> I can't easily imagine how it would fail to work for you.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
>> Well, I downloaded "https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/org/apache/mahout/mahout-distribution/0.4/mahout-distribution-0.4-src.tar.gz". I've unpacked and built it as described below. There is no bin directory.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsingers@apache.org]
>> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 1:32 PM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>>
>> If you download what's in mahout-distribution under the link Benson sent, you get a bin directory.
>>
>> On Oct 25, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
>>
>>> Followed the instructions in wiki BuildingMahout, but still no bin directory. Tried running mvn install -Prelease from top level. It took longer but still no bin directory. The wiki pages suggest mvn install should be sufficient to be able to run $MAHOUT_HOME/bin/mahout but with no bin directory...
>>>
>>> What is the correct mvn incantation to build bin? At minimum, the wiki needs to reflect this.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:40 AM
>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>>>
>>> mvn install doesn't make a bin directory.
>>>
>>> If your goal is a disrtro, you need -Prelease.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jeff Eastman
>>> <jd...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote:
>>>> On 10/24/10 6:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Here we go again.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
>>>>>
>>>>> This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
>>>>>
>>>>> vote good for 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 here.
>>>>>
>>>> I unpacked the new bits and the mvn install went ok, but after there is no
>>>> bin directory.
>>>>
>>
>> --------------------------
>> Grant Ingersoll
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
Here's where the bin dir arrives in my tree when I run a -Prelease build.
/Users/benson/asf/mahout/distribution/target ls
mahout-distribution-0.5-SNAPSHOT/mahout-distribution-0.5-SNAPSHOT
bin mahout-core-0.5-SNAPSHOT-job.jar mahout-math-0.4.jar
conf mahout-core-0.5-SNAPSHOT.jar mahout-math-0.5-SNAPSHOT.jar
docs mahout-examples-0.4-job.jar mahout-taste-webapp-0.4.war
lib mahout-examples-0.4.jar mahout-taste-webapp-0.5-SNAPSHOT.war
mahout-core-0.4-job.jar mahout-examples-0.5-SNAPSHOT-job.jar mahout-utils-0.4.jar
mahout-core-0.4.jar mahout-examples-0.5-SNAPSHOT.jar mahout-utils-0.5-SNAPSHOT.jar
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
> Ok, I'm frustrated too. The Quick Start instructions in the Wiki (BuildingMahout) say only to run "mvn install" from the checked-out directory. They say nothing about adding -Prelease, but even adding that to the top-level "mvn install -Prelease" does not produce a build with a bin directory. And, there is no bin directory in distribution/target directory either. It should not be this difficult.
>
> If the procedure detailed in the wiki does not produce a bin directory at $MAHOUT_HOME, then all of the examples which refer to $MAHOUT_HOME/bin/mahout ... will fail too.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:05 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>
> If you build with -Prelease, you should find the bin directory hiding
> down in distribution/target.
>
> I can't easily imagine how it would fail to work for you.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
>> Well, I downloaded "https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/org/apache/mahout/mahout-distribution/0.4/mahout-distribution-0.4-src.tar.gz". I've unpacked and built it as described below. There is no bin directory.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsingers@apache.org]
>> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 1:32 PM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>>
>> If you download what's in mahout-distribution under the link Benson sent, you get a bin directory.
>>
>> On Oct 25, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
>>
>>> Followed the instructions in wiki BuildingMahout, but still no bin directory. Tried running mvn install -Prelease from top level. It took longer but still no bin directory. The wiki pages suggest mvn install should be sufficient to be able to run $MAHOUT_HOME/bin/mahout but with no bin directory...
>>>
>>> What is the correct mvn incantation to build bin? At minimum, the wiki needs to reflect this.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:40 AM
>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>>>
>>> mvn install doesn't make a bin directory.
>>>
>>> If your goal is a disrtro, you need -Prelease.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jeff Eastman
>>> <jd...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote:
>>>> On 10/24/10 6:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Here we go again.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
>>>>>
>>>>> This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
>>>>>
>>>>> vote good for 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 here.
>>>>>
>>>> I unpacked the new bits and the mvn install went ok, but after there is no
>>>> bin directory.
>>>>
>>
>> --------------------------
>> Grant Ingersoll
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
> Ok, I'm frustrated too. The Quick Start instructions in the Wiki (BuildingMahout) say only to run "mvn install" from the checked-out directory. They say nothing about adding -Prelease, but even adding that to the top-level "mvn install -Prelease" does not produce a build with a bin directory. And, there is no bin directory in distribution/target directory either. It should not be this difficult.
Jeff,
I never wrote that the 'bin' directory would be sitting directly in
target. I wrote that it would be in the distribution artifacts in
target. Please run 'ls -R' in distribution/target and post the results
so that we can be on the same page.
Or log into people.apache.org and repro this so that I can log in and
see what you got.
The build instructions are tilted toward a 'traditional maven build.'
They assume that most people don't want a full distribution with a
'bin' directory. They just want to build the libraries. So the
instructions don't talk about the release process.
So, yes, the instructions could use some help here.
--benson
>
> If the procedure detailed in the wiki does not produce a bin directory at $MAHOUT_HOME, then all of the examples which refer to $MAHOUT_HOME/bin/mahout ... will fail too.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:05 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>
> If you build with -Prelease, you should find the bin directory hiding
> down in distribution/target.
>
> I can't easily imagine how it would fail to work for you.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
>> Well, I downloaded "https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/org/apache/mahout/mahout-distribution/0.4/mahout-distribution-0.4-src.tar.gz". I've unpacked and built it as described below. There is no bin directory.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsingers@apache.org]
>> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 1:32 PM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>>
>> If you download what's in mahout-distribution under the link Benson sent, you get a bin directory.
>>
>> On Oct 25, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
>>
>>> Followed the instructions in wiki BuildingMahout, but still no bin directory. Tried running mvn install -Prelease from top level. It took longer but still no bin directory. The wiki pages suggest mvn install should be sufficient to be able to run $MAHOUT_HOME/bin/mahout but with no bin directory...
>>>
>>> What is the correct mvn incantation to build bin? At minimum, the wiki needs to reflect this.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:40 AM
>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>>>
>>> mvn install doesn't make a bin directory.
>>>
>>> If your goal is a disrtro, you need -Prelease.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jeff Eastman
>>> <jd...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote:
>>>> On 10/24/10 6:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Here we go again.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
>>>>>
>>>>> This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
>>>>>
>>>>> vote good for 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 here.
>>>>>
>>>> I unpacked the new bits and the mvn install went ok, but after there is no
>>>> bin directory.
>>>>
>>
>> --------------------------
>> Grant Ingersoll
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>
>>
>
RE: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Jeff Eastman <je...@Narus.com>.
Ok, I'm frustrated too. The Quick Start instructions in the Wiki (BuildingMahout) say only to run "mvn install" from the checked-out directory. They say nothing about adding -Prelease, but even adding that to the top-level "mvn install -Prelease" does not produce a build with a bin directory. And, there is no bin directory in distribution/target directory either. It should not be this difficult.
If the procedure detailed in the wiki does not produce a bin directory at $MAHOUT_HOME, then all of the examples which refer to $MAHOUT_HOME/bin/mahout ... will fail too.
-----Original Message-----
From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:05 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
If you build with -Prelease, you should find the bin directory hiding
down in distribution/target.
I can't easily imagine how it would fail to work for you.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
> Well, I downloaded "https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/org/apache/mahout/mahout-distribution/0.4/mahout-distribution-0.4-src.tar.gz". I've unpacked and built it as described below. There is no bin directory.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsingers@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 1:32 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>
> If you download what's in mahout-distribution under the link Benson sent, you get a bin directory.
>
> On Oct 25, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
>
>> Followed the instructions in wiki BuildingMahout, but still no bin directory. Tried running mvn install -Prelease from top level. It took longer but still no bin directory. The wiki pages suggest mvn install should be sufficient to be able to run $MAHOUT_HOME/bin/mahout but with no bin directory...
>>
>> What is the correct mvn incantation to build bin? At minimum, the wiki needs to reflect this.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:40 AM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>>
>> mvn install doesn't make a bin directory.
>>
>> If your goal is a disrtro, you need -Prelease.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jeff Eastman
>> <jd...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/24/10 6:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here we go again.
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
>>>>
>>>> This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
>>>>
>>>> vote good for 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> +1 here.
>>>>
>>> I unpacked the new bits and the mvn install went ok, but after there is no
>>> bin directory.
>>>
>
> --------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
If you build with -Prelease, you should find the bin directory hiding
down in distribution/target.
I can't easily imagine how it would fail to work for you.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
> Well, I downloaded "https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/org/apache/mahout/mahout-distribution/0.4/mahout-distribution-0.4-src.tar.gz". I've unpacked and built it as described below. There is no bin directory.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsingers@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 1:32 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>
> If you download what's in mahout-distribution under the link Benson sent, you get a bin directory.
>
> On Oct 25, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
>
>> Followed the instructions in wiki BuildingMahout, but still no bin directory. Tried running mvn install -Prelease from top level. It took longer but still no bin directory. The wiki pages suggest mvn install should be sufficient to be able to run $MAHOUT_HOME/bin/mahout but with no bin directory...
>>
>> What is the correct mvn incantation to build bin? At minimum, the wiki needs to reflect this.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:40 AM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>>
>> mvn install doesn't make a bin directory.
>>
>> If your goal is a disrtro, you need -Prelease.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jeff Eastman
>> <jd...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/24/10 6:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here we go again.
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
>>>>
>>>> This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
>>>>
>>>> vote good for 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> +1 here.
>>>>
>>> I unpacked the new bits and the mvn install went ok, but after there is no
>>> bin directory.
>>>
>
> --------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
RE: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Jeff Eastman <je...@Narus.com>.
No apology required, I'm just glad it wasn't me and my trunk (again) <grin/>
-----Original Message-----
From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 4:55 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Hang on everyone. Jeff is trying to prove that you can build the
distro, bin and all, from the src tarball.
He's right! Something's wrong. No bin directory If I fetch from svn at
the mahout-0.4 tag and build, I get a bin. If I grab from the repo, I
do not get a bin.
I know what the problem is. Since the mahout shell script lives
outside any of the maven projects, it is not swept into the source
archive all all.
So, I VOTE -1, and I will fix this.
I owe Jeff a giant apology and a thank-you for finding this.
The fix is to move that bin directory. I'm going to do that right now.
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
Jeff,
Good job at being persistent!!!
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I owe Jeff a giant apology and a thank-you for finding this.
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
Right. but if it doesn't get copied into the src distro, it effectively
disappeared.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, the bin directory should live at the top level of the source tree
> On Oct 25, 2010 7:55 PM, "Benson Margulies" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hang on everyone. Jeff is trying to prove that you can build the
> > distro, bin and all, from the src tarball.
> >
> > He's right! Something's wrong. No bin directory If I fetch from svn at
> > the mahout-0.4 tag and build, I get a bin. If I grab from the repo, I
> > do not get a bin.
> >
> > I know what the problem is. Since the mahout shell script lives
> > outside any of the maven projects, it is not swept into the source
> > archive all all.
> >
> > So, I VOTE -1, and I will fix this.
> >
> > I owe Jeff a giant apology and a thank-you for finding this.
> >
> > The fix is to move that bin directory. I'm going to do that right now.
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
The next spin is in process. It takes, of course, 1/2 of forever.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Looks like it's there:
>
> tar tzvf mahout-distribution-0.4-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz | grep conf
> drwxr-xr-x 1000/1000 0 2010-10-20 21:58
> mahout-distribution-0.4-SNAPSHOT/conf/
> -rw-r--r-- drew/drew 36 2010-05-12 13:08
> mahout-distribution-0.4-SNAPSHOT/conf/seqdirectory.props
> [...]
>
> I see the rule in the src.xml assembly that's picking it up, so I
> think we're ok.
>
> Drew
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hmm. It was there before, I think, but now you have me worried. I'll check.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks Benson. I'm doing a build now. Before you start the respin, can
>>> you verify that your src distributions include the conf directory at
>>> the top level as well?
>>>
>>> Drew
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Drew, I've got the fix. I'm starting the release respin now. Please do
>>>> an svn up to see what I did to the src assembly descriptor.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Ok. I think I see the problem, the src.xml assembly should essentially
>>>>> have the same xml stanzas for the conf and bin directories that the
>>>>> bin.xml assembly does.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I'm testing a fix that leaves it where it is now. Stand by.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think that we are agreed that it has to survive into the source
>>>>>>>> distribution (and the binary distribution as well, of course).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, very much so. I'm looking at the assemblies now to figure out why
>>>>>>> that's not happening.
>>>>>>>I
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org>.
Looks like it's there:
tar tzvf mahout-distribution-0.4-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz | grep conf
drwxr-xr-x 1000/1000 0 2010-10-20 21:58
mahout-distribution-0.4-SNAPSHOT/conf/
-rw-r--r-- drew/drew 36 2010-05-12 13:08
mahout-distribution-0.4-SNAPSHOT/conf/seqdirectory.props
[...]
I see the rule in the src.xml assembly that's picking it up, so I
think we're ok.
Drew
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm. It was there before, I think, but now you have me worried. I'll check.
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Benson. I'm doing a build now. Before you start the respin, can
>> you verify that your src distributions include the conf directory at
>> the top level as well?
>>
>> Drew
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Drew, I've got the fix. I'm starting the release respin now. Please do
>>> an svn up to see what I did to the src assembly descriptor.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Ok. I think I see the problem, the src.xml assembly should essentially
>>>> have the same xml stanzas for the conf and bin directories that the
>>>> bin.xml assembly does.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I'm testing a fix that leaves it where it is now. Stand by.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think that we are agreed that it has to survive into the source
>>>>>>> distribution (and the binary distribution as well, of course).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, very much so. I'm looking at the assemblies now to figure out why
>>>>>> that's not happening.
>>>>>>I
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
Hmm. It was there before, I think, but now you have me worried. I'll check.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Benson. I'm doing a build now. Before you start the respin, can
> you verify that your src distributions include the conf directory at
> the top level as well?
>
> Drew
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Drew, I've got the fix. I'm starting the release respin now. Please do
>> an svn up to see what I did to the src assembly descriptor.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Ok. I think I see the problem, the src.xml assembly should essentially
>>> have the same xml stanzas for the conf and bin directories that the
>>> bin.xml assembly does.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm testing a fix that leaves it where it is now. Stand by.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think that we are agreed that it has to survive into the source
>>>>>> distribution (and the binary distribution as well, of course).
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, very much so. I'm looking at the assemblies now to figure out why
>>>>> that's not happening.
>>>>>I
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Drew Farris <dr...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Benson. I'm doing a build now. Before you start the respin, can
you verify that your src distributions include the conf directory at
the top level as well?
Drew
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Drew, I've got the fix. I'm starting the release respin now. Please do
> an svn up to see what I did to the src assembly descriptor.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Ok. I think I see the problem, the src.xml assembly should essentially
>> have the same xml stanzas for the conf and bin directories that the
>> bin.xml assembly does.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm testing a fix that leaves it where it is now. Stand by.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think that we are agreed that it has to survive into the source
>>>>> distribution (and the binary distribution as well, of course).
>>>>
>>>> Yes, very much so. I'm looking at the assemblies now to figure out why
>>>> that's not happening.
>>>>I
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
Drew, I've got the fix. I'm starting the release respin now. Please do
an svn up to see what I did to the src assembly descriptor.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ok. I think I see the problem, the src.xml assembly should essentially
> have the same xml stanzas for the conf and bin directories that the
> bin.xml assembly does.
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm testing a fix that leaves it where it is now. Stand by.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think that we are agreed that it has to survive into the source
>>>> distribution (and the binary distribution as well, of course).
>>>
>>> Yes, very much so. I'm looking at the assemblies now to figure out why
>>> that's not happening.
>>>I
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org>.
Ok. I think I see the problem, the src.xml assembly should essentially
have the same xml stanzas for the conf and bin directories that the
bin.xml assembly does.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm testing a fix that leaves it where it is now. Stand by.
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think that we are agreed that it has to survive into the source
>>> distribution (and the binary distribution as well, of course).
>>
>> Yes, very much so. I'm looking at the assemblies now to figure out why
>> that's not happening.
>>I
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
I'm testing a fix that leaves it where it is now. Stand by.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think that we are agreed that it has to survive into the source
>> distribution (and the binary distribution as well, of course).
>
> Yes, very much so. I'm looking at the assemblies now to figure out why
> that's not happening.
>I
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that we are agreed that it has to survive into the source
> distribution (and the binary distribution as well, of course).
Yes, very much so. I'm looking at the assemblies now to figure out why
that's not happening.
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
I use it live from the top as well (but don't particularly care where it is.
I think that we are agreed that it has to survive into the source
distribution (and the binary distribution as well, of course).
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org> wrote:
> I do use it live at the top of the build tree, and it is likely anyone
> else that's running from trunk does as well. For example,
> examples/bin/build-reuters.sh script expects it to be there.
>
> What was the reason for moving the distribution assembly to a
> sub-module in the first place? I can't recall the motivation there.
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Well, making it live at the top of the source tree is not working. Can
> > you explain why that makes a big difference? Are you actually using
> > the mahout script, live, in the build tree? If so, I need to find a
> > different solution to the problem at hand.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> No, the bin directory should live at the top level of the source tree
> >> On Oct 25, 2010 7:55 PM, "Benson Margulies" <bi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> Hang on everyone. Jeff is trying to prove that you can build the
> >>> distro, bin and all, from the src tarball.
> >>>
> >>> He's right! Something's wrong. No bin directory If I fetch from svn at
> >>> the mahout-0.4 tag and build, I get a bin. If I grab from the repo, I
> >>> do not get a bin.
> >>>
> >>> I know what the problem is. Since the mahout shell script lives
> >>> outside any of the maven projects, it is not swept into the source
> >>> archive all all.
> >>>
> >>> So, I VOTE -1, and I will fix this.
> >>>
> >>> I owe Jeff a giant apology and a thank-you for finding this.
> >>>
> >>> The fix is to move that bin directory. I'm going to do that right now.
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org>.
I do use it live at the top of the build tree, and it is likely anyone
else that's running from trunk does as well. For example,
examples/bin/build-reuters.sh script expects it to be there.
What was the reason for moving the distribution assembly to a
sub-module in the first place? I can't recall the motivation there.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, making it live at the top of the source tree is not working. Can
> you explain why that makes a big difference? Are you actually using
> the mahout script, live, in the build tree? If so, I need to find a
> different solution to the problem at hand.
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> No, the bin directory should live at the top level of the source tree
>> On Oct 25, 2010 7:55 PM, "Benson Margulies" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hang on everyone. Jeff is trying to prove that you can build the
>>> distro, bin and all, from the src tarball.
>>>
>>> He's right! Something's wrong. No bin directory If I fetch from svn at
>>> the mahout-0.4 tag and build, I get a bin. If I grab from the repo, I
>>> do not get a bin.
>>>
>>> I know what the problem is. Since the mahout shell script lives
>>> outside any of the maven projects, it is not swept into the source
>>> archive all all.
>>>
>>> So, I VOTE -1, and I will fix this.
>>>
>>> I owe Jeff a giant apology and a thank-you for finding this.
>>>
>>> The fix is to move that bin directory. I'm going to do that right now.
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
Well, making it live at the top of the source tree is not working. Can
you explain why that makes a big difference? Are you actually using
the mahout script, live, in the build tree? If so, I need to find a
different solution to the problem at hand.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Drew Farris <dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, the bin directory should live at the top level of the source tree
> On Oct 25, 2010 7:55 PM, "Benson Margulies" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hang on everyone. Jeff is trying to prove that you can build the
>> distro, bin and all, from the src tarball.
>>
>> He's right! Something's wrong. No bin directory If I fetch from svn at
>> the mahout-0.4 tag and build, I get a bin. If I grab from the repo, I
>> do not get a bin.
>>
>> I know what the problem is. Since the mahout shell script lives
>> outside any of the maven projects, it is not swept into the source
>> archive all all.
>>
>> So, I VOTE -1, and I will fix this.
>>
>> I owe Jeff a giant apology and a thank-you for finding this.
>>
>> The fix is to move that bin directory. I'm going to do that right now.
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Drew Farris <dr...@gmail.com>.
No, the bin directory should live at the top level of the source tree
On Oct 25, 2010 7:55 PM, "Benson Margulies" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hang on everyone. Jeff is trying to prove that you can build the
> distro, bin and all, from the src tarball.
>
> He's right! Something's wrong. No bin directory If I fetch from svn at
> the mahout-0.4 tag and build, I get a bin. If I grab from the repo, I
> do not get a bin.
>
> I know what the problem is. Since the mahout shell script lives
> outside any of the maven projects, it is not swept into the source
> archive all all.
>
> So, I VOTE -1, and I will fix this.
>
> I owe Jeff a giant apology and a thank-you for finding this.
>
> The fix is to move that bin directory. I'm going to do that right now.
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
Hang on everyone. Jeff is trying to prove that you can build the
distro, bin and all, from the src tarball.
He's right! Something's wrong. No bin directory If I fetch from svn at
the mahout-0.4 tag and build, I get a bin. If I grab from the repo, I
do not get a bin.
I know what the problem is. Since the mahout shell script lives
outside any of the maven projects, it is not swept into the source
archive all all.
So, I VOTE -1, and I will fix this.
I owe Jeff a giant apology and a thank-you for finding this.
The fix is to move that bin directory. I'm going to do that right now.
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
On Oct 25, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
> Well, I downloaded "https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/org/apache/mahout/mahout-distribution/0.4/mahout-distribution-0.4-src.tar.gz". I've unpacked
It's in the non src distribution: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/org/apache/mahout/mahout-distribution/0.4/mahout-distribution-0.4.tar.gz
I think it's also in: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/org/apache/mahout/mahout/0.4/
> and built it as described below. There is no bin directory.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsingers@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 1:32 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>
> If you download what's in mahout-distribution under the link Benson sent, you get a bin directory.
>
> On Oct 25, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
>
>> Followed the instructions in wiki BuildingMahout, but still no bin directory. Tried running mvn install -Prelease from top level. It took longer but still no bin directory. The wiki pages suggest mvn install should be sufficient to be able to run $MAHOUT_HOME/bin/mahout but with no bin directory...
>>
>> What is the correct mvn incantation to build bin? At minimum, the wiki needs to reflect this.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:40 AM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>>
>> mvn install doesn't make a bin directory.
>>
>> If your goal is a disrtro, you need -Prelease.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jeff Eastman
>> <jd...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/24/10 6:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here we go again.
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
>>>>
>>>> This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
>>>>
>>>> vote good for 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> +1 here.
>>>>
>>> I unpacked the new bits and the mvn install went ok, but after there is no
>>> bin directory.
>>>
>
> --------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene ecosystem docs using Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
RE: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Jeff Eastman <je...@Narus.com>.
Well, I downloaded "https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/org/apache/mahout/mahout-distribution/0.4/mahout-distribution-0.4-src.tar.gz". I've unpacked and built it as described below. There is no bin directory.
-----Original Message-----
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsingers@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 1:32 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
If you download what's in mahout-distribution under the link Benson sent, you get a bin directory.
On Oct 25, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
> Followed the instructions in wiki BuildingMahout, but still no bin directory. Tried running mvn install -Prelease from top level. It took longer but still no bin directory. The wiki pages suggest mvn install should be sufficient to be able to run $MAHOUT_HOME/bin/mahout but with no bin directory...
>
> What is the correct mvn incantation to build bin? At minimum, the wiki needs to reflect this.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:40 AM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>
> mvn install doesn't make a bin directory.
>
> If your goal is a disrtro, you need -Prelease.
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jeff Eastman
> <jd...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote:
>> On 10/24/10 6:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>
>>> Here we go again.
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
>>>
>>> This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
>>>
>>> vote good for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> +1 here.
>>>
>> I unpacked the new bits and the mvn install went ok, but after there is no
>> bin directory.
>>
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
If you download what's in mahout-distribution under the link Benson sent, you get a bin directory.
On Oct 25, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
> Followed the instructions in wiki BuildingMahout, but still no bin directory. Tried running mvn install -Prelease from top level. It took longer but still no bin directory. The wiki pages suggest mvn install should be sufficient to be able to run $MAHOUT_HOME/bin/mahout but with no bin directory...
>
> What is the correct mvn incantation to build bin? At minimum, the wiki needs to reflect this.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:40 AM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
>
> mvn install doesn't make a bin directory.
>
> If your goal is a disrtro, you need -Prelease.
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jeff Eastman
> <jd...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote:
>> On 10/24/10 6:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>
>>> Here we go again.
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
>>>
>>> This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
>>>
>>> vote good for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> +1 here.
>>>
>> I unpacked the new bits and the mvn install went ok, but after there is no
>> bin directory.
>>
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
RE: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Jeff Eastman <je...@Narus.com>.
Followed the instructions in wiki BuildingMahout, but still no bin directory. Tried running mvn install -Prelease from top level. It took longer but still no bin directory. The wiki pages suggest mvn install should be sufficient to be able to run $MAHOUT_HOME/bin/mahout but with no bin directory...
What is the correct mvn incantation to build bin? At minimum, the wiki needs to reflect this.
-----Original Message-----
From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:40 AM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
mvn install doesn't make a bin directory.
If your goal is a disrtro, you need -Prelease.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jeff Eastman
<jd...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote:
> On 10/24/10 6:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> Here we go again.
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
>>
>> This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
>>
>> vote good for 72 hours.
>>
>> +1 here.
>>
> I unpacked the new bits and the mvn install went ok, but after there is no
> bin directory.
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
mvn install doesn't make a bin directory.
If your goal is a disrtro, you need -Prelease.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jeff Eastman
<jd...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote:
> On 10/24/10 6:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> Here we go again.
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
>>
>> This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
>>
>> vote good for 72 hours.
>>
>> +1 here.
>>
> I unpacked the new bits and the mvn install went ok, but after there is no
> bin directory.
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Jeff Eastman <jd...@windwardsolutions.com>.
On 10/24/10 6:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Here we go again.
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
>
> This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
>
> vote good for 72 hours.
>
> +1 here.
>
I unpacked the new bits and the mvn install went ok, but after there is
no bin directory.
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by deneche abdelhakim <ad...@gmail.com>.
+1
signing Ok, "mvn clean install" is successful (using maven 2.2.1)
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Signing is OK, builds, tests run, looks complete from me again on this side.
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Here we go again.
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
>>
>> This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
>>
>> vote good for 72 hours.
>>
>> +1 here.
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
Signing is OK, builds, tests run, looks complete from me again on this side.
+1
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here we go again.
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-005/
>
> This has the additional fix to the distribution and updates to POMS.
>
> vote good for 72 hours.
>
> +1 here.
>