You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Till Rohrmann (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/05/19 10:10:04 UTC
[jira] [Closed] (FLINK-6612) ZooKeeperStateHandleStore does not
guard against concurrent delete operations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Till Rohrmann closed FLINK-6612.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
1.4.0: 3d119e1155aa8930cc7b18a085d6790cb2c63b70
1.3.0: f58fec70fef12056bd58b6cc2985532ccb07625e
> ZooKeeperStateHandleStore does not guard against concurrent delete operations
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-6612
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6612
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Distributed Coordination, State Backends, Checkpointing
> Affects Versions: 1.3.0, 1.4.0
> Reporter: Till Rohrmann
> Assignee: Till Rohrmann
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.3.0, 1.4.0
>
>
> The {{ZooKeeperStateHandleStore}} does not guard against concurrent delete operations which could happen in case of a lost leadership and a new leadership grant. The problem is that checkpoint nodes can get deleted even after they have been recovered by another {{ZooKeeperCompletedCheckpointStore}}. This corrupts the recovered checkpoint and thwarts future recoveries.
> I propose to add reference counting to the {{ZooKeeperStateHandleStore}}. That way, we can monitor how many concurrent processes have a hold on a given checkpoint node. Only if the reference count reaches {{0}}, we are allowed to delete the checkpoint node and dispose the checkpoint data.
> Stephan proposed to use ephemeral child nodes to track the reference count of a checkpoint node. That way we are sure that locks on the a checkpoint node are released in case of {{JobManager}} failures.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)