You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cassandra.apache.org by Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com> on 2009/08/18 04:26:46 UTC
[VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
The vote is now closed with the following results:
* +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
* 0 votes: 0
* -1 votes: 0
The vote passes.
Thanks everyone.
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 15:08 -0500, Eric Evans wrote:
> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
> Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
> Incubator PMC for this release.
>
> Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed,
> structured key-value store.
>
> Podling Vote thread:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg00639.html
> 0.4.0-beta1 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans
> SVN Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.4.0-beta1
> Project home: http://incubator.apache.org/cassandra/
> Incubation status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cassandra.html
--
Eric Evans
eevans@rackspace.com
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com>.
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 09:56 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> The distributed libthrift.jar is also missing a LICENSE.txt and
> NOTICE.txt in its META-INF dir.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-566
--
Eric Evans
eevans@rackspace.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Jonathan Ellis <jb...@gmail.com>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 12:05:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Joe Schaeferwrote:
> >> The relevant commit is r665124- Simon Forman doesn't yet have an ICLA
> >> on file with the ASF.
> >
> > I should probably explain the issue in more detail, since only the handful
> > of people who have read the Facebook CCLA as it pertains to Thrift
> > understand what I'm talking about.
> >
> > First take a look at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=665124
>
> Not to muddy the water further, but that commit says it is by mcslee
> and reviewed by Simon. Surely reviewing it doesn't give Simon any
> ownership rights?
I'm not putting much stock in what the commit log says- the fact that he's
listed as a contributor for that commit combined with the fact that the
Facebook CCLA lists him as an exclusion is what I'm basing my opinion on.
Only the Thrift devs would know definitively what Simon actually did.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by Jonathan Ellis <jb...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Joe Schaefer<jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> The relevant commit is r665124- Simon Forman doesn't yet have an ICLA
>> on file with the ASF.
>
> I should probably explain the issue in more detail, since only the handful
> of people who have read the Facebook CCLA as it pertains to Thrift
> understand what I'm talking about.
>
> First take a look at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=665124
Not to muddy the water further, but that commit says it is by mcslee
and reviewed by Simon. Surely reviewing it doesn't give Simon any
ownership rights?
-Jonathan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antelder@apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:20:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>
> > From: Joe Schaefer
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org; antelder@apache.org
> > Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:13:46 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >
> > > From: ant elder
> > > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > > Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:05:03 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Joe Schaeferwrote:
> > > > ----- Original Message ----
> > > >
> > > >> From: Joe Schaefer
> > > >> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antelder@apache.org
> > > >> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:58:16 AM
> > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> > > >>
> > > >> ----- Original Message ----
> > > >>
> > > >> > From: ant elder
> > > >> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > > >> > Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:31:57 AM
> > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebbwrote:
> > > >> > > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> > > >> > >> * 0 votes: 0
> > > >> > >> * -1 votes: 0
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> The vote passes.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
> > > >> > > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
> > > >> > > the LICENSE file.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
> > > >> > > libraries, apart from Groovy.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
> > > >> > done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
> > > >> > need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
> > > >> > license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
> > > >> > party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
> > > >> > the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
> > > >>
> > > >> I would like to see at least a mention of the lib/licenses directory in
> > > >> the LICENSE file. Moreover the LICENSE listed for the Thrift component
> > > >> is questionable since Thrift has never formally released anything under
> > > >> the Apache License and THRIFT-387 has now been reopened, which certainly
> > > >> affects the licensing of the java TProcessorFactory components
> distributed
> > > >> by the cassandra candidate.
> > > >
> > > > The distributed libthrift.jar is also missing a LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt
> > > > in its META-INF dir.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Though that is only required if the libthrift.jar is to be distributed
> > > separately, eg from a Maven repository, which isn't the case at the
> > > moment.
> >
> > Agreed that that aspect isn't essential here. The real issue is to figure out
> > what the licensing terms are on the TProcessorFactory component.
>
> The relevant commit is r665124- Simon Forman doesn't yet have an ICLA
> on file with the ASF.
I should probably explain the issue in more detail, since only the handful
of people who have read the Facebook CCLA as it pertains to Thrift
understand what I'm talking about.
First take a look at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=665124
That code is the property of Simon Forman, not Facebook, because Facebook
apparently expended no effort in obtaining copyright assignments or any other
form of licensing agreement which would give Facebook clear title to it.
The reason that code is in our subversion repository is because it was loaded
by me into our repo based on an svn dump provided by Facebook. Thus Simon
has implicitly licensed his work to Facebook to be distributed under the
Thrift License, which is an MIT variant. And they distributed his work
to us under that license, which is why I loaded it into our repo.
In the course of doing their work at Apache, the Thrift developers changed
all the Thrift-licensed code to the Apache License. Unfortunately nothing
gives them the right to do that with Simon Forman's contribution until and unless
Simon either explicitly approves of the change or better yet faxes in an ICLA
to Apache. Thus there is an outstanding problem with the current license
on those files.
Simon Forman is not alone, but fortunately there are only a handful of
outstanding exceptions to deal with. I have no idea if his contributions
are the only ones outstanding for the Java code within Thrift. What I
have done so far is talked about the issue to the legal team and written
Simon asking for him to send in an ICLA. If Simon doesn't get back to us
and never offers his approval, we can treat his contributions as we would
any other third party, and in this case sublicense his work. But we need
to do that properly if it comes to that.
HTH
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antelder@apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:20:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>
> > From: Joe Schaefer
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org; antelder@apache.org
> > Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:13:46 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >
> > > From: ant elder
> > > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > > Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:05:03 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Joe Schaeferwrote:
> > > > ----- Original Message ----
> > > >
> > > >> From: Joe Schaefer
> > > >> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antelder@apache.org
> > > >> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:58:16 AM
> > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> > > >>
> > > >> ----- Original Message ----
> > > >>
> > > >> > From: ant elder
> > > >> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > > >> > Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:31:57 AM
> > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebbwrote:
> > > >> > > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> > > >> > >> * 0 votes: 0
> > > >> > >> * -1 votes: 0
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> The vote passes.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
> > > >> > > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
> > > >> > > the LICENSE file.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
> > > >> > > libraries, apart from Groovy.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
> > > >> > done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
> > > >> > need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
> > > >> > license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
> > > >> > party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
> > > >> > the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
> > > >>
> > > >> I would like to see at least a mention of the lib/licenses directory in
> > > >> the LICENSE file. Moreover the LICENSE listed for the Thrift component
> > > >> is questionable since Thrift has never formally released anything under
> > > >> the Apache License and THRIFT-387 has now been reopened, which certainly
> > > >> affects the licensing of the java TProcessorFactory components
> distributed
> > > >> by the cassandra candidate.
> > > >
> > > > The distributed libthrift.jar is also missing a LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt
> > > > in its META-INF dir.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Though that is only required if the libthrift.jar is to be distributed
> > > separately, eg from a Maven repository, which isn't the case at the
> > > moment.
> >
> > Agreed that that aspect isn't essential here. The real issue is to figure out
> > what the licensing terms are on the TProcessorFactory component.
>
> The relevant commit is r665124- Simon Forman doesn't yet have an ICLA
> on file with the ASF.
I should probably explain the issue in more detail, since only the handful
of people who have read the Facebook CCLA as it pertains to Thrift
understand what I'm talking about.
First take a look at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=665124
That code is the property of Simon Forman, not Facebook, because Facebook
apparently expended no effort in obtaining copyright assignments or any other
form of licensing agreement which would give Facebook clear title to it.
The reason that code is in our subversion repository is because it was loaded
by me into our repo based on an svn dump provided by Facebook. Thus Simon
has implicitly licensed his work to Facebook to be distributed under the
Thrift License, which is an MIT variant. And they distributed his work
to us under that license, which is why I loaded it into our repo.
In the course of doing their work at Apache, the Thrift developers changed
all the Thrift-licensed code to the Apache License. Unfortunately nothing
gives them the right to do that with Simon Forman's contribution until and unless
Simon either explicitly approves of the change or better yet faxes in an ICLA
to Apache. Thus there is an outstanding problem with the current license
on those files.
Simon Forman is not alone, but fortunately there are only a handful of
outstanding exceptions to deal with. I have no idea if his contributions
are the only ones outstanding for the Java code within Thrift. What I
have done so far is talked about the issue to the legal team and written
Simon asking for him to send in an ICLA. If Simon doesn't get back to us
and never offers his approval, we can treat his contributions as we would
any other third party, and in this case sublicense his work. But we need
to do that properly if it comes to that.
HTH
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antelder@apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:13:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>
> > From: ant elder
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:05:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Joe Schaeferwrote:
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > >
> > >> From: Joe Schaefer
> > >> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antelder@apache.org
> > >> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:58:16 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>
> > >> > From: ant elder
> > >> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > >> > Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:31:57 AM
> > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebbwrote:
> > >> > > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> > >> > >> * 0 votes: 0
> > >> > >> * -1 votes: 0
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> The vote passes.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
> > >> > > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
> > >> > > the LICENSE file.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
> > >> > > libraries, apart from Groovy.
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
> > >> > done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
> > >> > need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
> > >> > license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
> > >> > party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
> > >> > the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
> > >>
> > >> I would like to see at least a mention of the lib/licenses directory in
> > >> the LICENSE file. Moreover the LICENSE listed for the Thrift component
> > >> is questionable since Thrift has never formally released anything under
> > >> the Apache License and THRIFT-387 has now been reopened, which certainly
> > >> affects the licensing of the java TProcessorFactory components distributed
> > >> by the cassandra candidate.
> > >
> > > The distributed libthrift.jar is also missing a LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt
> > > in its META-INF dir.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Though that is only required if the libthrift.jar is to be distributed
> > separately, eg from a Maven repository, which isn't the case at the
> > moment.
>
> Agreed that that aspect isn't essential here. The real issue is to figure out
> what the licensing terms are on the TProcessorFactory component.
The relevant commit is r665124- Simon Forman doesn't yet have an ICLA
on file with the ASF.
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antelder@apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:13:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>
> > From: ant elder
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:05:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Joe Schaeferwrote:
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > >
> > >> From: Joe Schaefer
> > >> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antelder@apache.org
> > >> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:58:16 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>
> > >> > From: ant elder
> > >> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > >> > Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:31:57 AM
> > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebbwrote:
> > >> > > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> > >> > >> * 0 votes: 0
> > >> > >> * -1 votes: 0
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> The vote passes.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
> > >> > > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
> > >> > > the LICENSE file.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
> > >> > > libraries, apart from Groovy.
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
> > >> > done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
> > >> > need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
> > >> > license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
> > >> > party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
> > >> > the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
> > >>
> > >> I would like to see at least a mention of the lib/licenses directory in
> > >> the LICENSE file. Moreover the LICENSE listed for the Thrift component
> > >> is questionable since Thrift has never formally released anything under
> > >> the Apache License and THRIFT-387 has now been reopened, which certainly
> > >> affects the licensing of the java TProcessorFactory components distributed
> > >> by the cassandra candidate.
> > >
> > > The distributed libthrift.jar is also missing a LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt
> > > in its META-INF dir.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Though that is only required if the libthrift.jar is to be distributed
> > separately, eg from a Maven repository, which isn't the case at the
> > moment.
>
> Agreed that that aspect isn't essential here. The real issue is to figure out
> what the licensing terms are on the TProcessorFactory component.
The relevant commit is r665124- Simon Forman doesn't yet have an ICLA
on file with the ASF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
----- Original Message ----
> From: ant elder <an...@apache.org>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:05:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Joe Schaeferwrote:
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >
> >> From: Joe Schaefer
> >> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antelder@apache.org
> >> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:58:16 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >>
> >> > From: ant elder
> >> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> >> > Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:31:57 AM
> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebbwrote:
> >> > > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> >> > >> * 0 votes: 0
> >> > >> * -1 votes: 0
> >> > >>
> >> > >> The vote passes.
> >> > >
> >> > > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
> >> > > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
> >> > > the LICENSE file.
> >> > >
> >> > > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
> >> > > libraries, apart from Groovy.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
> >> > done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
> >> > need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
> >> > license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
> >> > party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
> >> > the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
> >>
> >> I would like to see at least a mention of the lib/licenses directory in
> >> the LICENSE file. Moreover the LICENSE listed for the Thrift component
> >> is questionable since Thrift has never formally released anything under
> >> the Apache License and THRIFT-387 has now been reopened, which certainly
> >> affects the licensing of the java TProcessorFactory components distributed
> >> by the cassandra candidate.
> >
> > The distributed libthrift.jar is also missing a LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt
> > in its META-INF dir.
> >
> >
>
> Though that is only required if the libthrift.jar is to be distributed
> separately, eg from a Maven repository, which isn't the case at the
> moment.
Agreed that that aspect isn't essential here. The real issue is to figure out
what the licensing terms are on the TProcessorFactory component.
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
----- Original Message ----
> From: ant elder <an...@apache.org>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:05:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Joe Schaeferwrote:
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >
> >> From: Joe Schaefer
> >> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antelder@apache.org
> >> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:58:16 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >>
> >> > From: ant elder
> >> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> >> > Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:31:57 AM
> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebbwrote:
> >> > > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> >> > >> * 0 votes: 0
> >> > >> * -1 votes: 0
> >> > >>
> >> > >> The vote passes.
> >> > >
> >> > > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
> >> > > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
> >> > > the LICENSE file.
> >> > >
> >> > > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
> >> > > libraries, apart from Groovy.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
> >> > done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
> >> > need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
> >> > license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
> >> > party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
> >> > the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
> >>
> >> I would like to see at least a mention of the lib/licenses directory in
> >> the LICENSE file. Moreover the LICENSE listed for the Thrift component
> >> is questionable since Thrift has never formally released anything under
> >> the Apache License and THRIFT-387 has now been reopened, which certainly
> >> affects the licensing of the java TProcessorFactory components distributed
> >> by the cassandra candidate.
> >
> > The distributed libthrift.jar is also missing a LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt
> > in its META-INF dir.
> >
> >
>
> Though that is only required if the libthrift.jar is to be distributed
> separately, eg from a Maven repository, which isn't the case at the
> moment.
Agreed that that aspect isn't essential here. The real issue is to figure out
what the licensing terms are on the TProcessorFactory component.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Joe Schaefer<jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----
>
>> From: Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antelder@apache.org
>> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:58:16 AM
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>>
>> > From: ant elder
>> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> > Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:31:57 AM
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebbwrote:
>> > > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>> > >>
>> > >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
>> > >> * 0 votes: 0
>> > >> * -1 votes: 0
>> > >>
>> > >> The vote passes.
>> > >
>> > > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
>> > > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
>> > > the LICENSE file.
>> > >
>> > > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
>> > > libraries, apart from Groovy.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
>> > done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
>> > need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
>> > license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
>> > party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
>> > the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
>>
>> I would like to see at least a mention of the lib/licenses directory in
>> the LICENSE file. Moreover the LICENSE listed for the Thrift component
>> is questionable since Thrift has never formally released anything under
>> the Apache License and THRIFT-387 has now been reopened, which certainly
>> affects the licensing of the java TProcessorFactory components distributed
>> by the cassandra candidate.
>
> The distributed libthrift.jar is also missing a LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt
> in its META-INF dir.
>
>
Though that is only required if the libthrift.jar is to be distributed
separately, eg from a Maven repository, which isn't the case at the
moment.
...ant
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Joe Schaefer<jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----
>
>> From: Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antelder@apache.org
>> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:58:16 AM
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>>
>> > From: ant elder
>> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> > Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:31:57 AM
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebbwrote:
>> > > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>> > >>
>> > >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
>> > >> * 0 votes: 0
>> > >> * -1 votes: 0
>> > >>
>> > >> The vote passes.
>> > >
>> > > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
>> > > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
>> > > the LICENSE file.
>> > >
>> > > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
>> > > libraries, apart from Groovy.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
>> > done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
>> > need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
>> > license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
>> > party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
>> > the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
>>
>> I would like to see at least a mention of the lib/licenses directory in
>> the LICENSE file. Moreover the LICENSE listed for the Thrift component
>> is questionable since Thrift has never formally released anything under
>> the Apache License and THRIFT-387 has now been reopened, which certainly
>> affects the licensing of the java TProcessorFactory components distributed
>> by the cassandra candidate.
>
> The distributed libthrift.jar is also missing a LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt
> in its META-INF dir.
>
>
Though that is only required if the libthrift.jar is to be distributed
separately, eg from a Maven repository, which isn't the case at the
moment.
...ant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antelder@apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:58:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>
> > From: ant elder
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:31:57 AM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebbwrote:
> > > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
> > >>
> > >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> > >> * 0 votes: 0
> > >> * -1 votes: 0
> > >>
> > >> The vote passes.
> > >
> > > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
> > > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
> > > the LICENSE file.
> > >
> > > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
> > > libraries, apart from Groovy.
> > >
> >
> > Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
> > done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
> > need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
> > license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
> > party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
> > the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
>
> I would like to see at least a mention of the lib/licenses directory in
> the LICENSE file. Moreover the LICENSE listed for the Thrift component
> is questionable since Thrift has never formally released anything under
> the Apache License and THRIFT-387 has now been reopened, which certainly
> affects the licensing of the java TProcessorFactory components distributed
> by the cassandra candidate.
The distributed libthrift.jar is also missing a LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt
in its META-INF dir.
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
Works for me, but to get my +1 I need to see
libthrift.jar sorted out.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 12:55:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 07:58 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > I would like to see at least a mention of the lib/licenses directory
> > in the LICENSE file.
>
> Does the patch attached to CASSANDRA-371[0] suffice?
>
>
> [0]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12416885/v1-0001-CASSANDRA-371-top-level-reference-of-lib-licenses.txt
>
> --
> Eric Evans
> eevans@rackspace.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com>.
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 07:58 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> I would like to see at least a mention of the lib/licenses directory
> in the LICENSE file.
Does the patch attached to CASSANDRA-371[0] suffice?
[0]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12416885/v1-0001-CASSANDRA-371-top-level-reference-of-lib-licenses.txt
--
Eric Evans
eevans@rackspace.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antelder@apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:58:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>
> > From: ant elder
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:31:57 AM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebbwrote:
> > > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
> > >>
> > >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> > >> * 0 votes: 0
> > >> * -1 votes: 0
> > >>
> > >> The vote passes.
> > >
> > > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
> > > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
> > > the LICENSE file.
> > >
> > > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
> > > libraries, apart from Groovy.
> > >
> >
> > Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
> > done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
> > need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
> > license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
> > party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
> > the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
>
> I would like to see at least a mention of the lib/licenses directory in
> the LICENSE file. Moreover the LICENSE listed for the Thrift component
> is questionable since Thrift has never formally released anything under
> the Apache License and THRIFT-387 has now been reopened, which certainly
> affects the licensing of the java TProcessorFactory components distributed
> by the cassandra candidate.
The distributed libthrift.jar is also missing a LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt
in its META-INF dir.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
----- Original Message ----
> From: ant elder <an...@gmail.com>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:31:57 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebbwrote:
> > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
> >>
> >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
> >>
> >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> >> * 0 votes: 0
> >> * -1 votes: 0
> >>
> >> The vote passes.
> >
> > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
> > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
> > the LICENSE file.
> >
> > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
> > libraries, apart from Groovy.
> >
>
> Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
> done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
> need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
> license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
> party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
> the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
I would like to see at least a mention of the lib/licenses directory in
the LICENSE file. Moreover the LICENSE listed for the Thrift component
is questionable since Thrift has never formally released anything under
the Apache License and THRIFT-387 has now been reopened, which certainly
affects the licensing of the java TProcessorFactory components distributed
by the cassandra candidate.
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
----- Original Message ----
> From: ant elder <an...@gmail.com>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:31:57 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebbwrote:
> > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
> >>
> >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
> >>
> >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> >> * 0 votes: 0
> >> * -1 votes: 0
> >>
> >> The vote passes.
> >
> > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
> > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
> > the LICENSE file.
> >
> > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
> > libraries, apart from Groovy.
> >
>
> Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
> done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
> need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
> license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
> party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
> the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
I would like to see at least a mention of the lib/licenses directory in
the LICENSE file. Moreover the LICENSE listed for the Thrift component
is questionable since Thrift has never formally released anything under
the Apache License and THRIFT-387 has now been reopened, which certainly
affects the licensing of the java TProcessorFactory components distributed
by the cassandra candidate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:53 PM, sebb<se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18/08/2009, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebb<se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>> >>
>> >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
>> >> * 0 votes: 0
>> >> * -1 votes: 0
>> >>
>> >> The vote passes.
>> >
>> > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
>> > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
>> > the LICENSE file.
>> >
>> > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
>> > libraries, apart from Groovy.
>> >
>>
>>
>> Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
>> done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
>> need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
>> license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
>> party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
>> the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
>
> No, it doesn't exactly say that.
> The way I read it currently, the BSD notice needs to go into the
> NOTICE or LICENSE file, not a license file.
> Besides, the JIRA is still open.
>
> Also not resolved is the fact that the main LICENSE file neither
> includes nor has pointers to the other licenses.
>
It looks like this vote is done so i'll start a new thread on general@
about this.
...ant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:53 PM, sebb<se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18/08/2009, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebb<se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>> >>
>> >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
>> >> * 0 votes: 0
>> >> * -1 votes: 0
>> >>
>> >> The vote passes.
>> >
>> > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
>> > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
>> > the LICENSE file.
>> >
>> > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
>> > libraries, apart from Groovy.
>> >
>>
>>
>> Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
>> done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
>> need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
>> license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
>> party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
>> the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
>
> No, it doesn't exactly say that.
> The way I read it currently, the BSD notice needs to go into the
> NOTICE or LICENSE file, not a license file.
> Besides, the JIRA is still open.
>
> Also not resolved is the fact that the main LICENSE file neither
> includes nor has pointers to the other licenses.
>
It looks like this vote is done so i'll start a new thread on general@
about this.
...ant
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 18/08/2009, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebb<se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
> >>
> >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> >> * 0 votes: 0
> >> * -1 votes: 0
> >>
> >> The vote passes.
> >
> > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
> > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
> > the LICENSE file.
> >
> > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
> > libraries, apart from Groovy.
> >
>
>
> Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
> done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
> need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
> license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
> party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
> the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
No, it doesn't exactly say that.
The way I read it currently, the BSD notice needs to go into the
NOTICE or LICENSE file, not a license file.
Besides, the JIRA is still open.
Also not resolved is the fact that the main LICENSE file neither
includes nor has pointers to the other licenses.
> ...ant
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 18/08/2009, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebb<se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
> >>
> >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> >> * 0 votes: 0
> >> * -1 votes: 0
> >>
> >> The vote passes.
> >
> > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
> > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
> > the LICENSE file.
> >
> > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
> > libraries, apart from Groovy.
> >
>
>
> Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
> done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
> need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
> license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
> party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
> the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
No, it doesn't exactly say that.
The way I read it currently, the BSD notice needs to go into the
NOTICE or LICENSE file, not a license file.
Besides, the JIRA is still open.
Also not resolved is the fact that the main LICENSE file neither
includes nor has pointers to the other licenses.
> ...ant
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebb<se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>>
>> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>>
>> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
>> * 0 votes: 0
>> * -1 votes: 0
>>
>> The vote passes.
>
> I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
> in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
> the LICENSE file.
>
> Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
> libraries, apart from Groovy.
>
Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
...ant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:01 PM, sebb<se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>>
>> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>>
>> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
>> * 0 votes: 0
>> * -1 votes: 0
>>
>> The vote passes.
I was surprised to read this, as I noticed a discussion about the
release on the general@i.a.o list
And Sebb's mail pretty much indicates there are (still) some issues
-matthias
>
> I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
> in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
> the LICENSE file.
>
> Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
> libraries, apart from Groovy.
>
>> Thanks everyone.
>>
>> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 15:08 -0500, Eric Evans wrote:
>> > The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
>> > Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
>> > Incubator PMC for this release.
>> >
>> > Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed,
>> > structured key-value store.
>> >
>> > Podling Vote thread:
>> > http://www.mail-archive.com/cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg00639.html
>> > 0.4.0-beta1 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans
>> > SVN Tag:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.4.0-beta1
>> > Project home: http://incubator.apache.org/cassandra/
>> > Incubation status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cassandra.html
>>
>>
>> --
>> Eric Evans
>> eevans@rackspace.com
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebb<se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>>
>> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>>
>> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
>> * 0 votes: 0
>> * -1 votes: 0
>>
>> The vote passes.
>
> I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
> in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
> the LICENSE file.
>
> Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
> libraries, apart from Groovy.
>
Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.
...ant
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:01 PM, sebb<se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>>
>> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>>
>> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
>> * 0 votes: 0
>> * -1 votes: 0
>>
>> The vote passes.
I was surprised to read this, as I noticed a discussion about the
release on the general@i.a.o list
And Sebb's mail pretty much indicates there are (still) some issues
-matthias
>
> I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
> in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
> the LICENSE file.
>
> Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
> libraries, apart from Groovy.
>
>> Thanks everyone.
>>
>> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 15:08 -0500, Eric Evans wrote:
>> > The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
>> > Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
>> > Incubator PMC for this release.
>> >
>> > Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed,
>> > structured key-value store.
>> >
>> > Podling Vote thread:
>> > http://www.mail-archive.com/cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg00639.html
>> > 0.4.0-beta1 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans
>> > SVN Tag:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.4.0-beta1
>> > Project home: http://incubator.apache.org/cassandra/
>> > Incubation status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cassandra.html
>>
>>
>> --
>> Eric Evans
>> eevans@rackspace.com
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>
> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>
> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> * 0 votes: 0
> * -1 votes: 0
>
> The vote passes.
I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
the LICENSE file.
Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
libraries, apart from Groovy.
> Thanks everyone.
>
> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 15:08 -0500, Eric Evans wrote:
> > The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
> > Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
> > Incubator PMC for this release.
> >
> > Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed,
> > structured key-value store.
> >
> > Podling Vote thread:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg00639.html
> > 0.4.0-beta1 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans
> > SVN Tag:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.4.0-beta1
> > Project home: http://incubator.apache.org/cassandra/
> > Incubation status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cassandra.html
>
>
> --
> Eric Evans
> eevans@rackspace.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans <ee...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>
> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>
> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> * 0 votes: 0
> * -1 votes: 0
>
> The vote passes.
I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
the LICENSE file.
Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
libraries, apart from Groovy.
> Thanks everyone.
>
> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 15:08 -0500, Eric Evans wrote:
> > The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
> > Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
> > Incubator PMC for this release.
> >
> > Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed,
> > structured key-value store.
> >
> > Podling Vote thread:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg00639.html
> > 0.4.0-beta1 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans
> > SVN Tag:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.4.0-beta1
> > Project home: http://incubator.apache.org/cassandra/
> > Incubation status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cassandra.html
>
>
> --
> Eric Evans
> eevans@rackspace.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org