You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@solr.apache.org by "Timothy Potter (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/05/31 16:22:00 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-16199) Solr SQL using {!complexphrase} for wildcard filters doesn't always work as expected
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Timothy Potter resolved SOLR-16199.
-----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
> Solr SQL using {!complexphrase} for wildcard filters doesn't always work as expected
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-16199
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16199
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: Parallel SQL
> Reporter: Timothy Potter
> Assignee: Timothy Potter
> Priority: Major
> Labels: RobustSQL
> Fix For: 8.11.2, 9.1
>
> Time Spent: 3h 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> If a field is text analyzed, then doing {{{!complexphrase}name:\"Test*\"}} causes:
> {code}
> \"msg\":\"maxClauseCount is set to 1024\",\n \"trace\":\"org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery$TooManyClauses: maxClauseCount is set to 1024\\n\\tat
> {code}
> Working around the issue with the parens hack like {{name LIKE '(Test*)'}} makes the query work as expected. Perhaps we can just drop using the {{complexphrase}} parser if the predicate has a trailing wildcard only (leading too), that'll probably cover the bulk of the problems and use parens instead of double quotes if it has multiple wild card in it?
> Need to build some better test cases around wildcard matching for string and text analyzed fields.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@solr.apache.org