You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "HBase QA (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/12/03 10:22:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-23269) Hbase crashed due to two versions
of regionservers when rolling upgrading
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16986777#comment-16986777 ]
HBase QA commented on HBASE-23269:
----------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 10s{color} | {color:red} https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/844 does not apply to branch-1.4. Rebase required? Wrong Branch? See https://yetus.apache.org/documentation/in-progress/precommit-patchnames for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| GITHUB PR | https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/844 |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-23269 |
| Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-844/2/console |
| versions | git=2.17.1 |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.11.1 https://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Hbase crashed due to two versions of regionservers when rolling upgrading
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-23269
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23269
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: master
> Affects Versions: 1.4.0, 1.4.2, 1.4.9, 1.4.10, 1.4.11
> Reporter: Jianzhen Xu
> Assignee: Jianzhen Xu
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: 9.png, image-2019-11-07-14-49-41-253.png, image-2019-11-07-14-50-11-877.png, image-2019-11-07-14-51-38-858.png
>
>
> Currently, when hbase turns on the rs_group function and needs to upgrade to a higher version, the meta table maybe assign failed, which eventually makes the whole cluster unavailable and the availability drops to 0.This applies to all versions that introduce rs_group functionality in hbase-1.4.*. Including the patch of rs_group is introduced in the version below 1.4, upgrade to version 1.4 will also appear.
> When this happens during an upgrade:
> * When rolling upgrading regionservers, it must appear if the first rs of the upgrade is not in the same rs_group as the meta table.
> The phenomenon is as follows:
> !image-2019-11-07-14-50-11-877.png!
> !image-2019-11-07-14-51-38-858.png!
> The reason for this is as follows: during a rolling upgrade of the first regionserver node (denoted as RS1),RS1 started up and re-registered to zk,master triggered the operation through watcher perception in RegionServerTracker, and finally came to this method-HMaster.checkIfShouldMoveSystemRegionAsync()。
> The logic of this method is as follows:
>
> {code:java}
> // code placeholder
> public void checkIfShouldMoveSystemRegionAsync() {
> new Thread(new Runnable() {
> @Override
> public void run() {
> try {
> synchronized (checkIfShouldMoveSystemRegionLock) {
> // RS register on ZK after reports startup on master
> List<HRegionInfo> regionsShouldMove = new ArrayList<>();
> for (ServerName server : getExcludedServersForSystemTable()) {
> regionsShouldMove.addAll(getCarryingSystemTables(server));
> }
> if (!regionsShouldMove.isEmpty()) {
> List<RegionPlan> plans = new ArrayList<>();
> for (HRegionInfo regionInfo : regionsShouldMove) {
> RegionPlan plan = getRegionPlan(regionInfo, true);
> if (regionInfo.isMetaRegion()) {
> // Must move meta region first.
> balance(plan);
> } else {
> plans.add(plan);
> }
> }
> for (RegionPlan plan : plans) {
> balance(plan);
> }
> }
> }
> } catch (Throwable t) {
> LOG.error(t);
> }
> }
> }).start();
> }{code}
>
> # First execute getExcludedServersForSystemTable()：Get the highest version value in all regionservers and return all RSs below that version value, labeled LowVersionRSList
> # If 1 does not return null, iterate.If there is a region with system table on rs, add this region to the List that needs move.If the first rs upgraded at this point is not in the rs_group where the system table is located, the region of the meta table is added to regionsShouldMove
> # Get a Regionplan for the region in regionsShouldMove,, and the parameter forceNewPlan is true:
> ## Gets all regionserver which version is below the highest version;
> ## Exclude regionservers from 1) for all rs online status. The result is that only the rs has been upgraded will in collection, marked as destServers ;
> ## Since forceNewPlan is set to true, destination server will be obtained through balance.randomassignmet (region, destServers). Since rs_group function is enabled, the balance here is RSGroupBasedLoadBalancer.The logic in this method is:
> ### the destServers in 3.2 obtained intersect with all online regionservers in the rs_group of the current region.When region is a system table and not in the same rs_group, the result here is null.If null is returned, destination regionserver is hard-coded as BOGUS_SERVER_NAME(localhost,1);
> Therefore, when master assigns region of the system table to localhost,1, it will naturally assign failed.If the above master logic is not noticed and this problem occurs, you can randomly upgrade a node in the rs_group where the system table is located, and it will automatically recover.
> During the actual upgrade process, you will rarely know this problem without looking at the master code.However, the official document does not indicate that when using the rs_group function, the rs_group where the system table is located needs to be upgraded first. It is easy to get into this process and eventually crash.The system tables are assigned to the highest version of rs for compatibility purposes, the comment says.
> Therefore, without changing the code logic, it can be noted in the official documentation that the rs_group of the system table is the priority to be upgraded when the cluster is upgraded with the rs_group function.
>
>
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)