Re: pre-2.0.0-M1 tasks

[Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>]

This sounds good to me too but I don't want to be locked into it. If
additional things are added or it shifts in direction I'm fine with that. I
just don't want to commit to a specific agenda right now before the
technical challenges are fully clear to me.

Thanks,
Alex

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>wrote:

> Sounds very good to me.
>
> Clear path for us and our users willing to evaluate the future of ApacheDS.
>
> +1
>
> Regards,
> Pierre-Arnaud
>
> On 30 mai 2011, at 15:43, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > as it was discussed last week, we think it's now time to cut a release
> for ADS. The fact is that it will just be an intermediate release, not one
> we can tell our users to depend on, but for us, it's important to have a
> working base.
> >
> > I have started to reshuffle the issues, and created 2 more versions :
> > 2.0.0-M1 : for configuration in DIT
> > 2.0.0-M2 : for replication
> > 2.0.0-M3 : for administrative model
> >
> > IMO, it's important to assin one major feature to each milestone, but
> that does not mean we will not fix other issues nor we won't add some new
> features, it's just convenient.
> >
> > Currently, we have started a bug parade, and try to fix as many as we
> can, but I think we should start to cut the release this week.
> >
> > Any thoughts about this plan ?
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Cordialement,
> > Emmanuel Lécharny
> > www.iktek.com
> >
>
>

Re: pre-2.0.0-M1 tasks

[Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>]

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 6/1/11 8:53 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>> This sounds good to me too but I don't want to be locked into it. If
>> additional things are added or it shifts in direction I'm fine with that.
>> I
>> just don't want to commit to a specific agenda right now before the
>> technical challenges are fully clear to me.
>>
>
> There is no way we will get stuck into this agenda. This is just a
> proposal, to give some perspective.
>
> As usual, we are very able to change things and move around priorities.
> Thanks god !
>
> But having a roadmap helps us to focus on what is important.


OK I figured just wanted to make sure we explicitly are not locking into
anything.

Thanks for the feedback.

Alex

Re: pre-2.0.0-M1 tasks

[Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>]

On 6/1/11 8:53 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> This sounds good to me too but I don't want to be locked into it. If
> additional things are added or it shifts in direction I'm fine with that. I
> just don't want to commit to a specific agenda right now before the
> technical challenges are fully clear to me.

There is no way we will get stuck into this agenda. This is just a 
proposal, to give some perspective.

As usual, we are very able to change things and move around priorities. 
Thanks god !

But having a roadmap helps us to focus on what is important.

-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com