You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Mike Drob (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/01/06 16:51:58 UTC

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-9937) StandardDirectoryFactory::move never uses more efficient implementation

Mike Drob created SOLR-9937:
-------------------------------

             Summary: StandardDirectoryFactory::move never uses more efficient implementation
                 Key: SOLR-9937
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9937
             Project: Solr
          Issue Type: Bug
      Security Level: Public (Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
            Reporter: Mike Drob


{noformat}
      Path path1 = ((FSDirectory) baseFromDir).getDirectory().toAbsolutePath();
      Path path2 = ((FSDirectory) baseFromDir).getDirectory().toAbsolutePath();
      
      try {
        Files.move(path1.resolve(fileName), path2.resolve(fileName), StandardCopyOption.ATOMIC_MOVE);
      } catch (AtomicMoveNotSupportedException e) {
        Files.move(path1.resolve(fileName), path2.resolve(fileName));
      }
{noformat}

Because {{path1 == path2}} this code never does anything and move always defaults to the less efficient implementation in DirectoryFactory.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org