You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Mike Drob (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/01/06 16:51:58 UTC
[jira] [Created] (SOLR-9937) StandardDirectoryFactory::move never
uses more efficient implementation
Mike Drob created SOLR-9937:
-------------------------------
Summary: StandardDirectoryFactory::move never uses more efficient implementation
Key: SOLR-9937
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9937
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
Reporter: Mike Drob
{noformat}
Path path1 = ((FSDirectory) baseFromDir).getDirectory().toAbsolutePath();
Path path2 = ((FSDirectory) baseFromDir).getDirectory().toAbsolutePath();
try {
Files.move(path1.resolve(fileName), path2.resolve(fileName), StandardCopyOption.ATOMIC_MOVE);
} catch (AtomicMoveNotSupportedException e) {
Files.move(path1.resolve(fileName), path2.resolve(fileName));
}
{noformat}
Because {{path1 == path2}} this code never does anything and move always defaults to the less efficient implementation in DirectoryFactory.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org