You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Myrna van Lunteren (Resolved) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/04/19 04:12:39 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (DERBY-5671) NsTest does not run on trunk do multiple issues stemming from concurrency improvements

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Myrna van Lunteren resolved DERBY-5671.
---------------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 10.9.0.0

Unfortunately, my test runs (one with networkserver on linux, one with embedded on windows XP) only ran for 3 days before the machines booted automatically, but together with the runs of the shorter test format, I think this gives enough to say this is fixed.

It did seem that I got more 40XL1 (timeout) messages than I used to, but we always got some of those so I think this is ok.

Resolving.
                
> NsTest does not run on trunk do multiple issues stemming from concurrency improvements 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-5671
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5671
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 10.9.0.0
>
>
> As I understand it at least since September 30 of last year, the system test NsTest has been broken on trunk.   In  these six months the test has not been runnable, so we do not know if  new issues have been introduced with sequence generators or most importantly with auto-increment columns that are now based on them, which many, many applications rely upon.  Even if the known  problems are fixed later in the 10.9 release cycle and new problems are exposed, we won't be able to  go back to any point in time to discover when they might be released.
> In 10.8 we coped with this problem by backing out the concurrency improvements (DERBY-5448) pending fixes for DERBY-5422, DERBY-5454, DERBY-5430.   Currently none of those issues have been assigned.  Since this has been going on now for six months, I think we urgently need to stabiliize auto-increment columns and get this test running again on trunk.   I can see three possible options.
>     1) Someone with interest assign themselves to these issues and make significant progress over the next few weeks.
>     2)  Make the concurrency improvements optional  with a property which defaults to false (I don't know if this is practical)
>     3) Back the concurrency performance improvements out of trunk until these issues have been resolved and the change can be resubmitted.
> I realize that NsTest is not the easiest test to work with but it does seem to have found serious problems with generated columns that I think users are likely to hit.  In the past, a  similiar disregard for mailjdbc exposing a corruption issue meant that we actually released a bad  corruption issue that I know hit many users of Derby before we addressed it.  Autoincrement is widely, widely, used. We need to get it stabilized and the test running on trunk.   Although the system tests are not particularly easy to deal with, they are all we have and they do find issues.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira