Re: test

[Michael Mitiaguin <mi...@gmail.com>]

Actually there is.  Page 21 (  1.5.5 Field )
Though book describes Lucene 1.4  indexing which is obsolete in 1.9
and probably doesn't work in  2.0 , it should give a clear idea how to
transform to newer methods.

Regards
Michael

On 8/1/07, Patrick Burrows <pb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This part wasn't in that book. I looked.
>
> Well... the parts were there. But the arrangement is the art, isn't it?
>
>
> On 7/31/07, Simone Busoli <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > To everyone, please read *Lucene in Action*, it will teach you most of the
> > things you need to know about Lucene.
> >
> > Simone
> >
> > Patrick Burrows wrote:
> >
> > Ah. that's got it. Thanks!
> >
> > On 7/31/07, feran <fe...@whereistand.com> <fe...@whereistand.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Is the Field UN_TOKENIZED?
> >
> > If it's TOKENIZED you may not find it because the value will have been
> > split
> > into terms.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Patrick Burrows" <pb...@gmail.com> <pb...@gmail.com>
> > To: <lu...@incubator.apache.org> <lu...@incubator.apache.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 3:21 PM
> > Subject: Re: test
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hm...
> >
> > I do this:
> >
> > Query q = new TermQuery(new Term("link", args[1]));
> > (from a command line test app I made) and it still does not find the url
> > that Luke is showing me in the index. args[1] has the exact url copied
> >
> >
> > out
> >
> >
> > of Luke. I get 0 hits back -- which is probably better than getting
> > *every*
> > document back... but still not ideal.
> >
> >
> > On 7/31/07, Kurt Mackey <ku...@mubble.net> <ku...@mubble.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Not only can you, but it's preferred.  The QueryParser really only
> >
> >
> > exists
> >
> >
> >  to handle human input.  If you can do it programmatically, things are
> > much
> > easier.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Patrick Burrows [mailto:pburrows@gmail.com <pb...@gmail.com>]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 2:04 PM
> > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: test
> >
> > Yeah. That's exactly what is happening.
> >
> > Didn't realize I could use my own query without going through the
> >
> >
> > parser.
> >
> >
> >  On 7/31/07, Kurt Mackey <ku...@mubble.net> <ku...@mubble.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Are you using the query parser thing for that?  It will split on the
> > various special characters in a URL, and (by default) give you
> > something
> > like this for http://www.microsoft.com/windows:
> >
> > field:(http OR www OR microsoft OR come OR windows)
> >
> > For things like that, you'll need to build your own queries, not use
> > the
> > parser.
> >
> > -Kurt
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Patrick Burrows [mailto:pburrows@gmail.com <pb...@gmail.com>]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 1:45 PM
> > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: test
> >
> > hmm.... this seems to have made it through. My previous posts kept
> >
> >
> > getting
> >
> >
> > bounced for being spam.
> >
> > I had been trying to ask a question on searching for URLs. One of the
> > fields
> > in my index is called link. It holds nothing but URLs. There may be
> > more
> > than one link field per document.
> >
> > When I search on the url, though (using field:fullurl syntax) it
> > returns
> >
> >
> > a
> >
> >
> > hit on every field in the database.
> >
> > Is there special syntax for searching for a url?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/31/07, Patrick Burrows <pb...@gmail.com> <pb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > this is not spam, please stop bouncing it
> >
> > --
> > -
> > P
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -
> > P
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -
> > P
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -
> > P
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> -
> P
>

Re: test

[Patrick Burrows <pb...@gmail.com>]

Well, alright. Yet, I checked the index for URL and it wasn't in there.

This is why all books should be electronic. Any desktop search tool
(including lucene) would have found that easily.


On 7/31/07, Michael Mitiaguin <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Actually there is.  Page 21 (  1.5.5 Field )
> Though book describes Lucene 1.4  indexing which is obsolete in 1.9
> and probably doesn't work in  2.0 , it should give a clear idea how to
> transform to newer methods.
>
> Regards
> Michael
>
> On 8/1/07, Patrick Burrows <pb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This part wasn't in that book. I looked.
> >
> > Well... the parts were there. But the arrangement is the art, isn't it?
> >
> >
> > On 7/31/07, Simone Busoli <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > To everyone, please read *Lucene in Action*, it will teach you most of
> the
> > > things you need to know about Lucene.
> > >
> > > Simone
> > >
> > > Patrick Burrows wrote:
> > >
> > > Ah. that's got it. Thanks!
> > >
> > > On 7/31/07, feran <fe...@whereistand.com> <fe...@whereistand.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Is the Field UN_TOKENIZED?
> > >
> > > If it's TOKENIZED you may not find it because the value will have been
> > > split
> > > into terms.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Patrick Burrows" <pb...@gmail.com> <pb...@gmail.com>
> > > To: <lu...@incubator.apache.org> <
> lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 3:21 PM
> > > Subject: Re: test
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hm...
> > >
> > > I do this:
> > >
> > > Query q = new TermQuery(new Term("link", args[1]));
> > > (from a command line test app I made) and it still does not find the
> url
> > > that Luke is showing me in the index. args[1] has the exact url copied
> > >
> > >
> > > out
> > >
> > >
> > > of Luke. I get 0 hits back -- which is probably better than getting
> > > *every*
> > > document back... but still not ideal.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/31/07, Kurt Mackey <ku...@mubble.net> <ku...@mubble.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Not only can you, but it's preferred.  The QueryParser really only
> > >
> > >
> > > exists
> > >
> > >
> > >  to handle human input.  If you can do it programmatically, things are
> > > much
> > > easier.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Patrick Burrows [mailto:pburrows@gmail.com <pb...@gmail.com>]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 2:04 PM
> > > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: test
> > >
> > > Yeah. That's exactly what is happening.
> > >
> > > Didn't realize I could use my own query without going through the
> > >
> > >
> > > parser.
> > >
> > >
> > >  On 7/31/07, Kurt Mackey <ku...@mubble.net> <ku...@mubble.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Are you using the query parser thing for that?  It will split on the
> > > various special characters in a URL, and (by default) give you
> > > something
> > > like this for http://www.microsoft.com/windows:
> > >
> > > field:(http OR www OR microsoft OR come OR windows)
> > >
> > > For things like that, you'll need to build your own queries, not use
> > > the
> > > parser.
> > >
> > > -Kurt
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Patrick Burrows [mailto:pburrows@gmail.com <pb...@gmail.com>]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 1:45 PM
> > > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: test
> > >
> > > hmm.... this seems to have made it through. My previous posts kept
> > >
> > >
> > > getting
> > >
> > >
> > > bounced for being spam.
> > >
> > > I had been trying to ask a question on searching for URLs. One of the
> > > fields
> > > in my index is called link. It holds nothing but URLs. There may be
> > > more
> > > than one link field per document.
> > >
> > > When I search on the url, though (using field:fullurl syntax) it
> > > returns
> > >
> > >
> > > a
> > >
> > >
> > > hit on every field in the database.
> > >
> > > Is there special syntax for searching for a url?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/31/07, Patrick Burrows <pb...@gmail.com> <pb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > this is not spam, please stop bouncing it
> > >
> > > --
> > > -
> > > P
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -
> > > P
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -
> > > P
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -
> > > P
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -
> > P
> >
>



-- 
-
P