You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jacob Champion <ch...@gmail.com> on 2017/03/01 17:21:59 UTC

Re: svn commit: r1784990 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ modules/lua/

On 03/01/2017 08:54 AM, jim@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Wed Mar  1 16:54:35 2017
> New Revision: 1784990
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1784990&view=rev
> Log:
> Backport of Lua exhancements from trunk, mostly to support 5.3

In case it helps with the 5.3 effort: configure is not currently looking 
in the correct "lua5.3" flavor of include directories. I have a set of 
two patches up [1, 2] but I haven't checked them in yet because...

> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/lua/NWGNUmakefile
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/lua/NWGNUmakefile?rev=1784990&r1=1784989&r2=1784990&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/lua/NWGNUmakefile (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/lua/NWGNUmakefile Wed Mar  1 16:54:35 2017
> @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ XCFLAGS		+= \
>  #
>  XDEFINES	+= \
>  			-DLUA_COMPAT_ALL \
> +			-DLUA_COMPAT_5_2 \
> +			-DLUA_COMPAT_5_1 \
> +			-DLUA_COMPAT_MODULE \
>  			$(EOLIST)

...this doesn't help with compilation against Debian-distributed Lua 
5.3, because they've stopped enabling the deprecated compatibility APIs. 
I don't remember the exact APIs right now, but I pinged Daniel about it 
a couple weeks ago, so he might. :D

--Jacob

[1] https://github.com/jchampio/httpd/commit/3d5e915f
[2] https://github.com/jchampio/httpd/commit/eef76e90

Re: svn commit: r1784990 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ modules/lua/

Posted by Jacob Champion <ch...@gmail.com>.
On 03/01/2017 12:46 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I think it's also safe to adjust to keep the "Looking for" 5.1 -> 5.2
> to also add 5.3 explicitly

Yep, that's what my two patches do. I haven't checked them in because 
they break the build on Ubuntu.

--Jacob

Re: svn commit: r1784990 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ modules/lua/

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I think it's also safe to adjust to keep the "Looking for" 5.1 -> 5.2
to also add 5.3 explicitly

> On Mar 1, 2017, at 1:36 PM, Jacob Champion <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 03/01/2017 09:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Hmmm... WFM under macOS and fedora and centos.
> 
> Cool. I assume they're using an undecorated "liblua"? Debian ships a differently-named library for each version... not sure why.
> 
> (To be clear, this isn't a -1 on the backport or anything, just a note that 5.3 support isn't complete for the Debuntu crew.)
> 
> --Jacob
> 


Re: svn commit: r1784990 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ modules/lua/

Posted by Jacob Champion <ch...@gmail.com>.
On 03/01/2017 09:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Hmmm... WFM under macOS and fedora and centos.

Cool. I assume they're using an undecorated "liblua"? Debian ships a 
differently-named library for each version... not sure why.

(To be clear, this isn't a -1 on the backport or anything, just a note 
that 5.3 support isn't complete for the Debuntu crew.)

--Jacob


Re: svn commit: r1784990 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ modules/lua/

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Hmmm... WFM under macOS and fedora and centos.

> On Mar 1, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Jacob Champion <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 03/01/2017 08:54 AM, jim@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jim
>> Date: Wed Mar  1 16:54:35 2017
>> New Revision: 1784990
>> 
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1784990&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Backport of Lua exhancements from trunk, mostly to support 5.3
> 
> In case it helps with the 5.3 effort: configure is not currently looking in the correct "lua5.3" flavor of include directories. I have a set of two patches up [1, 2] but I haven't checked them in yet because...
> 
>> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/lua/NWGNUmakefile
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/lua/NWGNUmakefile?rev=1784990&r1=1784989&r2=1784990&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/lua/NWGNUmakefile (original)
>> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/lua/NWGNUmakefile Wed Mar  1 16:54:35 2017
>> @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ XCFLAGS		+= \
>> #
>> XDEFINES	+= \
>> 			-DLUA_COMPAT_ALL \
>> +			-DLUA_COMPAT_5_2 \
>> +			-DLUA_COMPAT_5_1 \
>> +			-DLUA_COMPAT_MODULE \
>> 			$(EOLIST)
> 
> ...this doesn't help with compilation against Debian-distributed Lua 5.3, because they've stopped enabling the deprecated compatibility APIs. I don't remember the exact APIs right now, but I pinged Daniel about it a couple weeks ago, so he might. :D
> 
> --Jacob
> 
> [1] https://github.com/jchampio/httpd/commit/3d5e915f
> [2] https://github.com/jchampio/httpd/commit/eef76e90