You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by "张铎 (Duo Zhang)" <pa...@gmail.com> on 2017/01/01 01:24:13 UTC

Re: Status of branch-1.3

Seems HBASE-16309 has only been pushed to master and branch-1. It is used
to fix the flaky TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio.

Could you try to see if it fix your problem on branch-1.3?

Thanks.

2017-01-01 6:01 GMT+08:00 Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>:

> That's tracked in the jira I mentioned above. I've seen it failing locally
> sporadically for me.
>
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Looking at https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/HBase-1.3-JDK8/,
> > TestDefaultCompactSelection
> > has been passing from build #72 to #86 (the latest).
> >
> > Results on JDK 7 builds were similar.
> >
> > Do you see the test fail locally ?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Pretty much all outstanding fixes (mostly around regressions in
> > > compactions, we had multiple regressions there) have been fixed.
> > >
> > > HBASE-16852 is the one thing that needs to be addressed, I haven't had
> > > cycles lately go get to the bottom of it and would appreciate if
> someone
> > > could pick this one up.
> > >
> > > Other than there should be no release blockers. I'll pick it up again
> at
> > > the beginning of January.
> > >
> > > -Mikhail
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> > andrew.purtell@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Where are we with getting a 1.3.0 release out of branch-1.3? How can
> I
> > > > help? Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > > Michael Antonov
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Michael Antonov
>

Re: Status of branch-1.3

Posted by Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>.
Not that I know of at the moment (there are few issues opened against 1.3
but i'd not consider them release blockers).

Thanks for the quick backport! Let me get my hands on the RC..

Thanks,
-Mikhail

On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 4:53 AM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> HBASE-16852 has been resolved.
> Is there any other blockers?
>
> Thanks.
>
> 2017-01-01 16:08 GMT+08:00 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com>:
>
> > I‘ve attached a backport patch in HBASE-16852. Can anyone help reviewing
> > it? It is only a testcase issue. Let's move on quickly to get 1.3 out.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > 2017-01-01 9:24 GMT+08:00 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Seems HBASE-16309 has only been pushed to master and branch-1. It is
> used
> >> to fix the flaky TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio.
> >>
> >> Could you try to see if it fix your problem on branch-1.3?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> 2017-01-01 6:01 GMT+08:00 Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> That's tracked in the jira I mentioned above. I've seen it failing
> >>> locally
> >>> sporadically for me.
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Looking at https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/HBase-1.3-JDK8/,
> >>> > TestDefaultCompactSelection
> >>> > has been passing from build #72 to #86 (the latest).
> >>> >
> >>> > Results on JDK 7 builds were similar.
> >>> >
> >>> > Do you see the test fail locally ?
> >>> >
> >>> > Cheers
> >>> >
> >>> > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Mikhail Antonov <
> >>> olorinbant@gmail.com>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Pretty much all outstanding fixes (mostly around regressions in
> >>> > > compactions, we had multiple regressions there) have been fixed.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > HBASE-16852 is the one thing that needs to be addressed, I haven't
> >>> had
> >>> > > cycles lately go get to the bottom of it and would appreciate if
> >>> someone
> >>> > > could pick this one up.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Other than there should be no release blockers. I'll pick it up
> >>> again at
> >>> > > the beginning of January.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > -Mikhail
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> >>> > andrew.purtell@gmail.com
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Hi all,
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Where are we with getting a 1.3.0 release out of branch-1.3? How
> >>> can I
> >>> > > > help? Thanks.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > --
> >>> > > Thanks,
> >>> > > Michael Antonov
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Michael Antonov
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Thanks,
Michael Antonov

Re: Status of branch-1.3

Posted by "张铎 (Duo Zhang)" <pa...@gmail.com>.
HBASE-16852 has been resolved.
Is there any other blockers?

Thanks.

2017-01-01 16:08 GMT+08:00 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com>:

> I‘ve attached a backport patch in HBASE-16852. Can anyone help reviewing
> it? It is only a testcase issue. Let's move on quickly to get 1.3 out.
>
> Thanks.
>
> 2017-01-01 9:24 GMT+08:00 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Seems HBASE-16309 has only been pushed to master and branch-1. It is used
>> to fix the flaky TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio.
>>
>> Could you try to see if it fix your problem on branch-1.3?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> 2017-01-01 6:01 GMT+08:00 Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> That's tracked in the jira I mentioned above. I've seen it failing
>>> locally
>>> sporadically for me.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Looking at https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/HBase-1.3-JDK8/,
>>> > TestDefaultCompactSelection
>>> > has been passing from build #72 to #86 (the latest).
>>> >
>>> > Results on JDK 7 builds were similar.
>>> >
>>> > Do you see the test fail locally ?
>>> >
>>> > Cheers
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Mikhail Antonov <
>>> olorinbant@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Pretty much all outstanding fixes (mostly around regressions in
>>> > > compactions, we had multiple regressions there) have been fixed.
>>> > >
>>> > > HBASE-16852 is the one thing that needs to be addressed, I haven't
>>> had
>>> > > cycles lately go get to the bottom of it and would appreciate if
>>> someone
>>> > > could pick this one up.
>>> > >
>>> > > Other than there should be no release blockers. I'll pick it up
>>> again at
>>> > > the beginning of January.
>>> > >
>>> > > -Mikhail
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <
>>> > andrew.purtell@gmail.com
>>> > > >
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi all,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Where are we with getting a 1.3.0 release out of branch-1.3? How
>>> can I
>>> > > > help? Thanks.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Thanks,
>>> > > Michael Antonov
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Michael Antonov
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: Status of branch-1.3

Posted by "张铎 (Duo Zhang)" <pa...@gmail.com>.
I‘ve attached a backport patch in HBASE-16852. Can anyone help reviewing
it? It is only a testcase issue. Let's move on quickly to get 1.3 out.

Thanks.

2017-01-01 9:24 GMT+08:00 张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com>:

> Seems HBASE-16309 has only been pushed to master and branch-1. It is used
> to fix the flaky TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio.
>
> Could you try to see if it fix your problem on branch-1.3?
>
> Thanks.
>
> 2017-01-01 6:01 GMT+08:00 Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>:
>
>> That's tracked in the jira I mentioned above. I've seen it failing locally
>> sporadically for me.
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Looking at https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/HBase-1.3-JDK8/,
>> > TestDefaultCompactSelection
>> > has been passing from build #72 to #86 (the latest).
>> >
>> > Results on JDK 7 builds were similar.
>> >
>> > Do you see the test fail locally ?
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinbant@gmail.com
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Pretty much all outstanding fixes (mostly around regressions in
>> > > compactions, we had multiple regressions there) have been fixed.
>> > >
>> > > HBASE-16852 is the one thing that needs to be addressed, I haven't had
>> > > cycles lately go get to the bottom of it and would appreciate if
>> someone
>> > > could pick this one up.
>> > >
>> > > Other than there should be no release blockers. I'll pick it up again
>> at
>> > > the beginning of January.
>> > >
>> > > -Mikhail
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <
>> > andrew.purtell@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi all,
>> > > >
>> > > > Where are we with getting a 1.3.0 release out of branch-1.3? How
>> can I
>> > > > help? Thanks.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Michael Antonov
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Michael Antonov
>>
>
>