You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tinkerpop.apache.org by "stephen mallette (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/11/15 13:33:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1834) Consider iterate() as a first
class step
stephen mallette created TINKERPOP-1834:
-------------------------------------------
Summary: Consider iterate() as a first class step
Key: TINKERPOP-1834
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1834
Project: TinkerPop
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: process
Affects Versions: 3.2.6
Reporter: stephen mallette
Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez
The {{iterate()}} terminator on a traversal returns no data. It simply executes the traversal in full typically for the generation of side-effects. Graph providers could optimize a traversal that is iterated should they be able to detect that this method is called as they might avoid certain read operations if the traversal is explicitly meant to just update the graph.
A possible solution for this would be some form of direct implementation of an explicit {{IterateStep}} which providers could identify. Or perhaps, a more generic {{NoOpStep}} would be better where the {{NoOpStep}} would basically just be a marker with some meta-data tied to it (i.e. a {{Map}} of arbitrary configuration options). In this case, the configuration options would simply have an "iterate" value in it which the provider could interpret if they could optimize based on that. Other solutions?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)