You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by rp...@apache.org on 2008/11/26 22:58:56 UTC

svn commit: r720993 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Author: rpluem
Date: Wed Nov 26 13:58:56 2008
New Revision: 720993

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=720993&view=rev
Log:
* Question is resolved so vote.

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=720993&r1=720992&r2=720993&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Wed Nov 26 13:58:56 2008
@@ -115,11 +115,7 @@
         http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=720250
       Backport version for 2.2.x of patch:
          Trunk version of patch works (minus CHANGES conflict)
-      +1: jim
-      rpluem says: There was a discussion after r693120 about a better approach
-      (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200809.mbox/%3cA90E03FB-E728-480A-A05B-31CAAF5FE803@jaguNET.com%3e).
-      Shouldn't we commit the result of this discussion to trunk and backport it?
-      jim says: r720250 resolves the discussion, it also backports cleanly.
+      +1: jim, rpluem
 
 PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED