You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tamaya.apache.org by Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com> on 2019/08/25 15:41:52 UTC
[VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 0.4-incubating release of Tamaya
out.
The artifacts available via the Apache's Nexus [1].
The tag for this release candidate is available at [2] and will be renamed
once the vote passed.
Please take a look at the artifacts and vote!
Please note: This vote is a "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1
votes (see [3]).
------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and
why ...
------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Anatole Tresch
[1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1036/
[2]
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tamaya.git;a=commit;h=d2d60786e3e72a2bb16e14e1b195f7b2487a33eb
[3] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
--
*Anatole Tresch*
PPMC Member Apache Tamaya
JCP Star Spec Lead
*Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
*maketechsimple.wordpress.com <http://maketechsimple.wordpress.com/> *
*Twitter: @atsticks, @tamayaconf*
[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating
Posted by Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com>.
This vote has been closed since there were SNAPSHOT references in some POM
files.
So I will recreate the release after this has been fixed and restart a new
vote (already happened).
J Anatole
--
*Anatole Tresch*
PPMC Member Apache Tamaya
JCP Star Spec Lead
*Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
*maketechsimple.wordpress.com <http://maketechsimple.wordpress.com/> *
*Twitter: @atsticks, @tamayaconf*
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating
Posted by Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com>.
Aaron, thanks very much for these points. The sandbox is not an issue since
it is not part of the release. It can be updated after the release
separately.
Am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019 um 17:37 Uhr schrieb Aaron Coburn <
aaron.coburn@gmail.com>:
> -1 (non-binding)
>
> The microprofile extension depends on the tamaya-api
> 0.4-incubating-SNAPSHOT artifact, which will cause problems when trying to
> use that (and that is the artifact I am most interested in using)
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tamaya-extensions/blob/vote-0.4-incubating-01/modules/microprofile/pom.xml#L39
>
> In the sandbox modules, it appears that most (all?) of the modules depend
> on SNAPSHOT artifacts from tamaya-api and various -extension artifacts:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tamaya-sandbox/blob/vote-0.4-incubating-01/pom.xml#L43
>
> Less significant: examples 05 and 06 in the extension repo also depend on
> snapshot artifacts.
>
> Otherwise, the code builds and tests correctly.
>
> Aaron
>
>
>
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 11:42, Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was running the needed tasks to get the 0.4-incubating release of
> Tamaya
> > out.
> > The artifacts available via the Apache's Nexus [1].
> > The tag for this release candidate is available at [2] and will be
> renamed
> > once the vote passed.
> >
> > Please take a look at the artifacts and vote!
> >
> > Please note: This vote is a "majority approval" with a minimum of three
> +1
> > votes (see [3]).
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> and
> > why ...
> > ------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Anatole Tresch
> >
> > [1]
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1036/
> >
> > [2]
> >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tamaya.git;a=commit;h=d2d60786e3e72a2bb16e14e1b195f7b2487a33eb
> >
> > [3] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Anatole Tresch*
> > PPMC Member Apache Tamaya
> > JCP Star Spec Lead
> > *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
> > *maketechsimple.wordpress.com <http://maketechsimple.wordpress.com/> *
> > *Twitter: @atsticks, @tamayaconf*
> >
>
--
*Anatole Tresch*
PPMC Member Apache Tamaya
JCP Star Spec Lead
*Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
*maketechsimple.wordpress.com <http://maketechsimple.wordpress.com/> *
*Twitter: @atsticks, @tamayaconf*
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@apache.org>.
Thanks for your efforts, Anatole!
Am 26.08.19 um 19:22 schrieb Anatole Tresch:
> its rather simple. We have to fix it, and rebuild everything. Takes round
> about ab hour, so I try to do so later.
+1
We must not depend on SNAPSHOTs.
Apart from that the vote thread should have a definite end ....
My pet project - only depending on tamaya-core - worked fine so far.
Cheers,
Phil
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating
Posted by Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com>.
its rather simple. We have to fix it, and rebuild everything. Takes round
about ab hour, so I try to do so later.
J Anatole
Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019, 19:06:
> Could you point us/Anatole to how it can be addressed?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Werner
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 6:08 PM Aaron Coburn <aa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > The staging repository should be exactly the same as the eventual
> released
> > artifacts. You can see in the POM file for the microprofile artifact that
> > it depends on a SNAPSHOT API:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1036/org/apache/tamaya/ext/tamaya-microprofile/0.4-incubating/tamaya-microprofile-0.4-incubating.pom
> >
> > If released as-is, the microprofile artifact will not work properly. (The
> > same applies to the -sandbox items)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 11:43, Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Wouldn't it be possible to change from snapshot only once 0.4 is
> > released,
> > > or should it work without Snapshot in staging?
> > >
> > > Aaron Coburn <aa...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019,
> > > 17:37:
> > >
> > > > -1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > The microprofile extension depends on the tamaya-api
> > > > 0.4-incubating-SNAPSHOT artifact, which will cause problems when
> trying
> > > to
> > > > use that (and that is the artifact I am most interested in using)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tamaya-extensions/blob/vote-0.4-incubating-01/modules/microprofile/pom.xml#L39
> > > >
> > > > In the sandbox modules, it appears that most (all?) of the modules
> > depend
> > > > on SNAPSHOT artifacts from tamaya-api and various -extension
> artifacts:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tamaya-sandbox/blob/vote-0.4-incubating-01/pom.xml#L43
> > > >
> > > > Less significant: examples 05 and 06 in the extension repo also
> depend
> > on
> > > > snapshot artifacts.
> > > >
> > > > Otherwise, the code builds and tests correctly.
> > > >
> > > > Aaron
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 11:42, Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 0.4-incubating release of
> > > > Tamaya
> > > > > out.
> > > > > The artifacts available via the Apache's Nexus [1].
> > > > > The tag for this release candidate is available at [2] and will be
> > > > renamed
> > > > > once the vote passed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please take a look at the artifacts and vote!
> > > > >
> > > > > Please note: This vote is a "majority approval" with a minimum of
> > three
> > > > +1
> > > > > votes (see [3]).
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > > > [ ] +0
> > > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> > released,
> > > > and
> > > > > why ...
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Anatole Tresch
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1036/
> > > > >
> > > > > [2]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tamaya.git;a=commit;h=d2d60786e3e72a2bb16e14e1b195f7b2487a33eb
> > > > >
> > > > > [3] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Anatole Tresch*
> > > > > PPMC Member Apache Tamaya
> > > > > JCP Star Spec Lead
> > > > > *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
> > > > > *maketechsimple.wordpress.com <
> http://maketechsimple.wordpress.com/>
> > *
> > > > > *Twitter: @atsticks, @tamayaconf*
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Could you point us/Anatole to how it can be addressed?
Thanks,
Werner
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 6:08 PM Aaron Coburn <aa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The staging repository should be exactly the same as the eventual released
> artifacts. You can see in the POM file for the microprofile artifact that
> it depends on a SNAPSHOT API:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1036/org/apache/tamaya/ext/tamaya-microprofile/0.4-incubating/tamaya-microprofile-0.4-incubating.pom
>
> If released as-is, the microprofile artifact will not work properly. (The
> same applies to the -sandbox items)
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 11:43, Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't it be possible to change from snapshot only once 0.4 is
> released,
> > or should it work without Snapshot in staging?
> >
> > Aaron Coburn <aa...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019,
> > 17:37:
> >
> > > -1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > The microprofile extension depends on the tamaya-api
> > > 0.4-incubating-SNAPSHOT artifact, which will cause problems when trying
> > to
> > > use that (and that is the artifact I am most interested in using)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tamaya-extensions/blob/vote-0.4-incubating-01/modules/microprofile/pom.xml#L39
> > >
> > > In the sandbox modules, it appears that most (all?) of the modules
> depend
> > > on SNAPSHOT artifacts from tamaya-api and various -extension artifacts:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tamaya-sandbox/blob/vote-0.4-incubating-01/pom.xml#L43
> > >
> > > Less significant: examples 05 and 06 in the extension repo also depend
> on
> > > snapshot artifacts.
> > >
> > > Otherwise, the code builds and tests correctly.
> > >
> > > Aaron
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 11:42, Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 0.4-incubating release of
> > > Tamaya
> > > > out.
> > > > The artifacts available via the Apache's Nexus [1].
> > > > The tag for this release candidate is available at [2] and will be
> > > renamed
> > > > once the vote passed.
> > > >
> > > > Please take a look at the artifacts and vote!
> > > >
> > > > Please note: This vote is a "majority approval" with a minimum of
> three
> > > +1
> > > > votes (see [3]).
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > > [ ] +0
> > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> released,
> > > and
> > > > why ...
> > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Anatole Tresch
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1036/
> > > >
> > > > [2]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tamaya.git;a=commit;h=d2d60786e3e72a2bb16e14e1b195f7b2487a33eb
> > > >
> > > > [3] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Anatole Tresch*
> > > > PPMC Member Apache Tamaya
> > > > JCP Star Spec Lead
> > > > *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
> > > > *maketechsimple.wordpress.com <http://maketechsimple.wordpress.com/>
> *
> > > > *Twitter: @atsticks, @tamayaconf*
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating
Posted by Aaron Coburn <aa...@gmail.com>.
The staging repository should be exactly the same as the eventual released
artifacts. You can see in the POM file for the microprofile artifact that
it depends on a SNAPSHOT API:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1036/org/apache/tamaya/ext/tamaya-microprofile/0.4-incubating/tamaya-microprofile-0.4-incubating.pom
If released as-is, the microprofile artifact will not work properly. (The
same applies to the -sandbox items)
On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 11:43, Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wouldn't it be possible to change from snapshot only once 0.4 is released,
> or should it work without Snapshot in staging?
>
> Aaron Coburn <aa...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019,
> 17:37:
>
> > -1 (non-binding)
> >
> > The microprofile extension depends on the tamaya-api
> > 0.4-incubating-SNAPSHOT artifact, which will cause problems when trying
> to
> > use that (and that is the artifact I am most interested in using)
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tamaya-extensions/blob/vote-0.4-incubating-01/modules/microprofile/pom.xml#L39
> >
> > In the sandbox modules, it appears that most (all?) of the modules depend
> > on SNAPSHOT artifacts from tamaya-api and various -extension artifacts:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tamaya-sandbox/blob/vote-0.4-incubating-01/pom.xml#L43
> >
> > Less significant: examples 05 and 06 in the extension repo also depend on
> > snapshot artifacts.
> >
> > Otherwise, the code builds and tests correctly.
> >
> > Aaron
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 11:42, Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 0.4-incubating release of
> > Tamaya
> > > out.
> > > The artifacts available via the Apache's Nexus [1].
> > > The tag for this release candidate is available at [2] and will be
> > renamed
> > > once the vote passed.
> > >
> > > Please take a look at the artifacts and vote!
> > >
> > > Please note: This vote is a "majority approval" with a minimum of three
> > +1
> > > votes (see [3]).
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > and
> > > why ...
> > > ------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Anatole Tresch
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1036/
> > >
> > > [2]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tamaya.git;a=commit;h=d2d60786e3e72a2bb16e14e1b195f7b2487a33eb
> > >
> > > [3] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Anatole Tresch*
> > > PPMC Member Apache Tamaya
> > > JCP Star Spec Lead
> > > *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
> > > *maketechsimple.wordpress.com <http://maketechsimple.wordpress.com/> *
> > > *Twitter: @atsticks, @tamayaconf*
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Wouldn't it be possible to change from snapshot only once 0.4 is released,
or should it work without Snapshot in staging?
Aaron Coburn <aa...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019, 17:37:
> -1 (non-binding)
>
> The microprofile extension depends on the tamaya-api
> 0.4-incubating-SNAPSHOT artifact, which will cause problems when trying to
> use that (and that is the artifact I am most interested in using)
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tamaya-extensions/blob/vote-0.4-incubating-01/modules/microprofile/pom.xml#L39
>
> In the sandbox modules, it appears that most (all?) of the modules depend
> on SNAPSHOT artifacts from tamaya-api and various -extension artifacts:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tamaya-sandbox/blob/vote-0.4-incubating-01/pom.xml#L43
>
> Less significant: examples 05 and 06 in the extension repo also depend on
> snapshot artifacts.
>
> Otherwise, the code builds and tests correctly.
>
> Aaron
>
>
>
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 11:42, Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was running the needed tasks to get the 0.4-incubating release of
> Tamaya
> > out.
> > The artifacts available via the Apache's Nexus [1].
> > The tag for this release candidate is available at [2] and will be
> renamed
> > once the vote passed.
> >
> > Please take a look at the artifacts and vote!
> >
> > Please note: This vote is a "majority approval" with a minimum of three
> +1
> > votes (see [3]).
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> and
> > why ...
> > ------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Anatole Tresch
> >
> > [1]
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1036/
> >
> > [2]
> >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tamaya.git;a=commit;h=d2d60786e3e72a2bb16e14e1b195f7b2487a33eb
> >
> > [3] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Anatole Tresch*
> > PPMC Member Apache Tamaya
> > JCP Star Spec Lead
> > *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
> > *maketechsimple.wordpress.com <http://maketechsimple.wordpress.com/> *
> > *Twitter: @atsticks, @tamayaconf*
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating
Posted by Aaron Coburn <aa...@gmail.com>.
-1 (non-binding)
The microprofile extension depends on the tamaya-api
0.4-incubating-SNAPSHOT artifact, which will cause problems when trying to
use that (and that is the artifact I am most interested in using)
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tamaya-extensions/blob/vote-0.4-incubating-01/modules/microprofile/pom.xml#L39
In the sandbox modules, it appears that most (all?) of the modules depend
on SNAPSHOT artifacts from tamaya-api and various -extension artifacts:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tamaya-sandbox/blob/vote-0.4-incubating-01/pom.xml#L43
Less significant: examples 05 and 06 in the extension repo also depend on
snapshot artifacts.
Otherwise, the code builds and tests correctly.
Aaron
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 11:42, Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was running the needed tasks to get the 0.4-incubating release of Tamaya
> out.
> The artifacts available via the Apache's Nexus [1].
> The tag for this release candidate is available at [2] and will be renamed
> once the vote passed.
>
> Please take a look at the artifacts and vote!
>
> Please note: This vote is a "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1
> votes (see [3]).
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and
> why ...
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
> Anatole Tresch
>
> [1]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1036/
>
> [2]
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tamaya.git;a=commit;h=d2d60786e3e72a2bb16e14e1b195f7b2487a33eb
>
> [3] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>
>
> --
> *Anatole Tresch*
> PPMC Member Apache Tamaya
> JCP Star Spec Lead
> *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
> *maketechsimple.wordpress.com <http://maketechsimple.wordpress.com/> *
> *Twitter: @atsticks, @tamayaconf*
>