You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jcp-open@apache.org by Sian January <si...@googlemail.com> on 2008/12/01 10:51:00 UTC

Re: Request for TCK for JSR-200 (Network Transfer Format for Java Archives)

Hi Geir,

Is there any news on this, or anything I need to do at all to help the
process along?

Thanks,

Sian


2008/11/17 Geir Magnusson Jr. <ge...@pobox.com>:
> if it's a separable TCK, we'll get it.
>
> geir
>
> On Nov 17, 2008, at 10:58 AM, Sian January wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Along with several others I have been working on implementing JSR-200
>> (pack200) in Apache Harmony and I would like to ask if the appropriate
>> person would be able to request the TCK for this JSR from Sun?
>>
>> I am aware that JSR-200 is a part of JSR-176 (Java 5), which Sun have
>> so far not given us a JCK license for, however I believe that it would
>> still be useful to be able to test the compatability for JSR-200 on
>> its own if at all possible.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Sian January
>>
>> -- Unless stated otherwise above:
>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
>> 741598.
>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
>



-- 
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

Re: Request for TCK for JSR-200 (Network Transfer Format for Java Archives)

Posted by Sian January <si...@googlemail.com>.
Ok - thanks very much.

2008/12/1 Geir Magnusson Jr. <ge...@pobox.com>:
> Nope.  It appears separable.  I'll do the license and support request.
>
> geir
>
> On Dec 1, 2008, at 4:51 AM, Sian January wrote:
>
>> Hi Geir,
>>
>> Is there any news on this, or anything I need to do at all to help the
>> process along?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Sian
>>
>>
>> 2008/11/17 Geir Magnusson Jr. <ge...@pobox.com>:
>>>
>>> if it's a separable TCK, we'll get it.
>>>
>>> geir
>>>
>>> On Nov 17, 2008, at 10:58 AM, Sian January wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Along with several others I have been working on implementing JSR-200
>>>> (pack200) in Apache Harmony and I would like to ask if the appropriate
>>>> person would be able to request the TCK for this JSR from Sun?
>>>>
>>>> I am aware that JSR-200 is a part of JSR-176 (Java 5), which Sun have
>>>> so far not given us a JCK license for, however I believe that it would
>>>> still be useful to be able to test the compatability for JSR-200 on
>>>> its own if at all possible.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>
>>>> Sian January
>>>>
>>>> -- Unless stated otherwise above:
>>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
>>>> 741598.
>>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
>>>> 3AU
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
>> 741598.
>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
>



-- 
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

Re: Request for TCK for JSR-200 (Network Transfer Format for Java Archives)

Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>.
Nope.  It appears separable.  I'll do the license and support request.

geir

On Dec 1, 2008, at 4:51 AM, Sian January wrote:

> Hi Geir,
>
> Is there any news on this, or anything I need to do at all to help the
> process along?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sian
>
>
> 2008/11/17 Geir Magnusson Jr. <ge...@pobox.com>:
>> if it's a separable TCK, we'll get it.
>>
>> geir
>>
>> On Nov 17, 2008, at 10:58 AM, Sian January wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Along with several others I have been working on implementing  
>>> JSR-200
>>> (pack200) in Apache Harmony and I would like to ask if the  
>>> appropriate
>>> person would be able to request the TCK for this JSR from Sun?
>>>
>>> I am aware that JSR-200 is a part of JSR-176 (Java 5), which Sun  
>>> have
>>> so far not given us a JCK license for, however I believe that it  
>>> would
>>> still be useful to be able to test the compatability for JSR-200 on
>>> its own if at all possible.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> Sian January
>>>
>>> -- Unless stated otherwise above:
>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with  
>>> number
>>> 741598.
>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire  
>>> PO6 3AU
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with  
> number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire  
> PO6 3AU