You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@pulsar.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/05/21 03:27:20 UTC

[GitHub] [pulsar] xuesong172500 opened a new pull request #7007: issue #6698, Add instantiation interface in Pulsar function (#6706)

xuesong172500 opened a new pull request #7007:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/7007


   <!--
   ### Contribution Checklist
     
     - Name the pull request in the form "[Issue XYZ][component] Title of the pull request", where *XYZ* should be replaced by the actual issue number.
       Skip *Issue XYZ* if there is no associated github issue for this pull request.
       Skip *component* if you are unsure about which is the best component. E.g. `[docs] Fix typo in produce method`.
   
     - Fill out the template below to describe the changes contributed by the pull request. That will give reviewers the context they need to do the review.
     
     - Each pull request should address only one issue, not mix up code from multiple issues.
     
     - Each commit in the pull request has a meaningful commit message
   
     - Once all items of the checklist are addressed, remove the above text and this checklist, leaving only the filled out template below.
   
   **(The sections below can be removed for hotfixes of typos)**
   -->
   
   *(If this PR fixes a github issue, please add `Fixes #<xyz>`.)*
   
   Fixes #6698
   (or if this PR is one task of a github issue, please add Master Issue: #<xyz> to link to the master issue.)
   
   Master Issue: #6698
   
   Motivation
   Explain here the context, and why you're making that change. What is the problem you're trying to solve.
   
   Modifications
   1.add prepare interface in Function.java
   
   2.swith classloader after setupJavaInstance,before process in JavaInstanceRunnable.java.
   
   *Describe the modifications you've done.*
   
   ### Verifying this change
   
   - [ ] Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.
   
   *(Please pick either of the following options)*
   
   This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
   
   *(or)*
   
   This change is already covered by existing tests, such as *(please describe tests)*.
   
   *(or)*
   
   This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
   
   *(example:)*
     - *Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)*
     - *Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure*
   
   ### Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
   *If `yes` was chosen, please highlight the changes*
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
     - The public API: (yes / no)
     - The schema: (yes / no / don't know)
     - The default values of configurations: (yes / no)
     - The wire protocol: (yes / no)
     - The rest endpoints: (yes / no)
     - The admin cli options: (yes / no)
     - Anything that affects deployment: (yes / no / don't know)
   
   ### Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)
     - If a feature is not applicable for documentation, explain why?
     - If a feature is not documented yet in this PR, please create a followup issue for adding the documentation
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [pulsar] xuesong172500 commented on pull request #7007: issue #6698, Add instantiation interface in Pulsar function (#6706)

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
xuesong172500 commented on pull request #7007:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/7007#issuecomment-641655701


   After starting the function, if no message is sent, the initialization operation will not be performed, and the success of initialization cannot be guaranteed. In this way, the status of the runtime is normal, but the actual operation is abnormal
   
   
    
   From: Boyang Jerry Peng
   Date: 2020-06-10 01:57
   To: apache/pulsar
   CC: xuesong172500; Mention
   Subject: Re: [apache/pulsar] issue #6698, Add instantiation interface in Pulsar function (#6706) (#7007)
   @xuesong172500 thanks for working on this. We generally avoid adding new methods for the existing function interface. For prepare/initialize, can you just trigger the method after the "process" method gets the first message?
   —
   You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
   Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [pulsar] jerrypeng commented on pull request #7007: issue #6698, Add instantiation interface in Pulsar function (#6706)

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
jerrypeng commented on pull request #7007:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/7007#issuecomment-641477547


   @xuesong172500 thanks for working on this.  We generally avoid adding new methods for the existing function interface.  For prepare/initialize, can you just trigger the method after the "process" method gets the first message?


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org