Re: VOTE: the rules project

[Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Duncan Findlay writes:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 03:23:58PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> > Based on email from the last few weeks, I think we're all pretty happy
> > with the sandboxes idea as described on
> > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RulesProjSandboxes .  It's also the
> > first step on the way to all the other listed ideas. Given that, I've come
> > up with a task list to get us there.   So can we get votes, both for the
> > plan, and for the tasks?  Here they are:
> 
> I'm not sure the tasks really need to be voted on, I mean, would it
> make sense if we approved all but number 3? :-)

ah whatever ;)   I'm just trying to make sure we don't wind up
either 

- - (a) in a situation where someone says "that's not what I was voting
  for!" or

- - (b) in a situation where we have a load of +0.5s, and not enough full
  +1s, resulting in all 5 tasks getting stalled when only 1 or 2 of them
  were the controversial ones.

oh btw -- my votes, in case it's not obvious, +1 on the lot.

- --j.

> > - PMC: vote to approve the sandboxes project
> > - reorganise the rules directory into core/ , sandbox/, and extra/; link
> >   that rules project SVN repository to 3.2.0's 'rules' dir; use SVN
> >   externals to do this.
> > - write scripts to test, filter, and pull rules from sandboxes
> >   automatically into core/ production ruleset
> > - move current ruleset into a new "legacy" sandbox
> > - start using the above scripts to generate core/ ruleset in svn
> 
> +5
> 
> i.e. +1 for each of the above.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFC/pkaMJF5cimLx9ARAgCqAJ9TYU7xavD8I62qepqNK8h/E2Rv+gCfQVq+
3Y5gL5fkx3z2lIvoYPe57fk=
=bBqa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----