A Property exists, but no it's value ?

[Hervé Agnoux <he...@diaam-informatique.com>]

Hi,

I have this stack trace :
Caused by: javax.jcr.RepositoryException: property 
/iaa:autonome/iaa:recueil/iaa:copies/iaa:copie_gimick_22_147/valeurs: single-
valued property with no value
        at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.PropertyImpl.internalGetValue(PropertyImpl.java:471)
        at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.PropertyImpl.getValue(PropertyImpl.java:489)
        at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.PropertyImpl.getStream(PropertyImpl.java:502)

If I look at the PropertyImpl.java source, line 470, I see this comment :  "// 
should never be the case, but being a little paranoid can't hurt..."

It's midnight for me, so it's time to be paranoid...

What do you think of that ? How can I control that ?

It's jackarabbit 1.5.

Re: A Property exists, but no it's value ?

[Hervé Agnoux <he...@diaam-informatique.com>]

Le vendredi 30 janvier 2009, Stefan Guggisberg a écrit :
>
> did you perhaps modify the node type definitions? the name of the property
> 'valeurs' suggests a multi-value property, but apparently it's declared as
> being single-valued. multi-value properties are allowed to have an empty
> value array.
>

I think it's a bad multi-threads gestion. My fault.

Yes, ti's a single-value property.

I look at my "synchronized" stuff. Thank you for your help.

Re: A Property exists, but no it's value ?

[Stefan Guggisberg <st...@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Hervé Agnoux
<he...@diaam-informatique.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have this stack trace :
> Caused by: javax.jcr.RepositoryException: property
> /iaa:autonome/iaa:recueil/iaa:copies/iaa:copie_gimick_22_147/valeurs: single-
> valued property with no value
>        at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.PropertyImpl.internalGetValue(PropertyImpl.java:471)
>        at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.PropertyImpl.getValue(PropertyImpl.java:489)
>        at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.PropertyImpl.getStream(PropertyImpl.java:502)
>
> If I look at the PropertyImpl.java source, line 470, I see this comment :  "//
> should never be the case, but being a little paranoid can't hurt..."
>
> It's midnight for me, so it's time to be paranoid...
>
> What do you think of that ? How can I control that ?

did you perhaps modify the node type definitions? the name of the property
'valeurs' suggests a multi-value property, but apparently it's declared as
being single-valued. multi-value properties are allowed to have an empty
value array.

cheers
stefan

>
> It's jackarabbit 1.5.
>
>
>
>