CVS sandboxing (was: JSR 109 implementation for Apache (can we have CVS))

[Leo Simons <le...@apache.org>]

Hi gang!

in general, all code that is put on ASF servers must be put there by an 
ASF committer who has signed the Contributor's License Agreement. Legal 
oversight 'n all. So while it sure is possible to create a sandbox cvs, 
its still not possible to provide non-committers with access to that 
sandbox.

Hence, sourceforge (or some other CVS server) is your best bet.

regards!

- Leo Simons

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> +1 to not affecting the geronimo main codebase right now, but
> a contrib/ or sandbox/ kinda place would be useful for this type
> of experimentation. That way people can develop stuff there and
> then merge in. sf.net is always an option, but that seems
> "too disconnected" to me.

Re: CVS sandboxing (was: JSR 109 implementation for Apache (can we have CVS))

[Davanum Srinivas <di...@yahoo.com>]

Thanks Leo. As i stated in my other email. Let's use sf.net JUST for the code and share all other
resources like wiki etc with the regular geronimo project.

Thanks,
dims

--- Leo Simons <le...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi gang!
> 
> in general, all code that is put on ASF servers must be put there by an 
> ASF committer who has signed the Contributor's License Agreement. Legal 
> oversight 'n all. So while it sure is possible to create a sandbox cvs, 
> its still not possible to provide non-committers with access to that 
> sandbox.
> 
> Hence, sourceforge (or some other CVS server) is your best bet.
> 
> regards!
> 
> - Leo Simons
> 
> Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> > +1 to not affecting the geronimo main codebase right now, but
> > a contrib/ or sandbox/ kinda place would be useful for this type
> > of experimentation. That way people can develop stuff there and
> > then merge in. sf.net is always an option, but that seems
> > "too disconnected" to me.
> 
> 


=====
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/