Additional Methods on DataRowStore

[Andrew Lindesay <ap...@lindesay.co.nz>]

Hello (Andrus?);

It is possible to turn the notifications on and off from the DataRowStore, but it is not possible to externally set the handler from outside the class.  Are you able to add these two methods to STABLE-3.0 and 3.1 so I am able to control that;

    public void setRemoteNotificationsHandler(EventBridge value) {
        remoteNotificationsHandler = value;
    }
    
    public EventBridge getRemoteNotificationsHandler() {
        return remoteNotificationsHandler;
    }

cheers.

___
Andrew Lindesay
www.silvereye.co.nz

Re: Additional Methods on DataRowStore

[Andrew Lindesay <ap...@lindesay.co.nz>]

Hi Andrus;

Yes; that is possibly a better approach.  I will give it a go.

Thanks.

> Maybe it is easier to go with a custom EventBridgeFactory specified in the Modeler instead?

___
Andrew Lindesay
www.silvereye.co.nz

Re: Additional Methods on DataRowStore

[Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>]

No objections in general, but you will need to ensure somehow the  
correct lifecycle of an EventBridge within DataRowStore. I.e. if we  
are changing the bridge, the old one has to be shut down, then the new  
one needs to be started, but only if DataRowStore has not been  
shutdown yet.

Maybe it is easier to go with a custom EventBridgeFactory specified in  
the Modeler instead?

Andrus

On May 13, 2010, at 5:42 AM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:

> Hello (Andrus?);
>
> It is possible to turn the notifications on and off from the  
> DataRowStore, but it is not possible to externally set the handler  
> from outside the class.  Are you able to add these two methods to  
> STABLE-3.0 and 3.1 so I am able to control that;
>
>    public void setRemoteNotificationsHandler(EventBridge value) {
>        remoteNotificationsHandler = value;
>    }
>
>    public EventBridge getRemoteNotificationsHandler() {
>        return remoteNotificationsHandler;
>    }
>
> cheers.
>
> ___
> Andrew Lindesay
> www.silvereye.co.nz
>
>