You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com> on 2012/07/23 13:16:18 UTC
[RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on revision
1364583
Hi,
I would like to propose the next build for AOO 3.4.1 based on revision
1364583.
To avoid potential confusion this build is intended to become released
as AOO3.4.1 if no serious issues will be found.
The related voting procedure will be started when we have the builds
available.
Juergen
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
<jo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> @Ariel: is that ok for you and the Linux builds? What do you expect how
> long it will take to upload the files (full install sets + language packs)?
I calculated that ca. 14 GB of packages takes almost two days. A full
install set takes about 30-45 minutes:
Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.1_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
100% 155MB 63.4KB/s 41:44
Regards
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Pedro Giffuni <pf...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello guys;
> Just wondering ..
> Can I chop the Python-2.6.1 src tarball now? I left it around to make
> sure I don't break anything but it shouldn't be needed in trunk anymore.
The AOO 3.4.0 source tarballs rely on the trunk's ext-src, right?
So maybe we should wait for AOO 3.4.1 to be officially released first.
That way we can always point developers to a working source
distribution.
-Rob
> Pedro.
>
> --- Gio 26/7/12, Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com> ha scritto:
>
>
> not with the Hunspell update but indirectly by the integration of the
> new download mechanism. The file is new on the branch and included
> changes for these version updates that were already done on the trunk.
> Important for me to understand where it comes from to avoid such things
> in the future ...
>
> Thanks Ariel for detecting it, I would probably have stumbled over it
> when I would have tested the source release package which is on my plan
> for this week.
>
> Juergen
>
>>
>> I am currently building a new MacOS and Windows version based on
>> revision 1365887
>>
>> @Ariel: can you please build the Linux versions based on this revision
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on revision 1364583
Posted by Pedro Giffuni <pf...@apache.org>.
Hello guys;
Just wondering ..
Can I chop the Python-2.6.1 src tarball now? I left it around to make
sure I don't break anything but it shouldn't be needed in trunk anymore.
Pedro.
--- Gio 26/7/12, Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com> ha scritto:
not with the Hunspell update but indirectly by the integration of the
new download mechanism. The file is new on the branch and included
changes for these version updates that were already done on the trunk.
Important for me to understand where it comes from to avoid such things
in the future ...
Thanks Ariel for detecting it, I would probably have stumbled over it
when I would have tested the source release package which is on my plan
for this week.
Juergen
>
> I am currently building a new MacOS and Windows version based on
> revision 1365887
>
> @Ariel: can you please build the Linux versions based on this revision
>
> Juergen
>
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/26/12 8:36 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 7/26/12 3:23 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:26:19PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>>> =============
>>> Building module apache-commons
>>> =============
>>>
>>> Entering /home/ariel/AOO/aoo-3.4.1/main/apache-commons/java/codec
>>>
>>> mkout -- version: 1.8
>>> dmake: Error: -- `../../unxlngx6.pro/misc/af3c3acf618de6108d65fcdc92b492e1-commons-codec-1.3-src.unpack' not found, and can't be made
>>>
>>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /home/ariel/AOO/aoo-3.4.1/main/apache-commons/java/codec
>>>
>>>
>>> As building from the source release is broken, this may need a fix and
>>> a new RC (hopefully the last one).
>>
>> attached patch seems to fix the bug.
>>
>
> the changes come unfortunately with the Hunspell update. I have reviewed
> and applied your patch.
not with the Hunspell update but indirectly by the integration of the
new download mechanism. The file is new on the branch and included
changes for these version updates that were already done on the trunk.
Important for me to understand where it comes from to avoid such things
in the future ...
Thanks Ariel for detecting it, I would probably have stumbled over it
when I would have tested the source release package which is on my plan
for this week.
Juergen
>
> I am currently building a new MacOS and Windows version based on
> revision 1365887
>
> @Ariel: can you please build the Linux versions based on this revision
>
> Juergen
>
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/26/12 3:23 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:26:19PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>> =============
>> Building module apache-commons
>> =============
>>
>> Entering /home/ariel/AOO/aoo-3.4.1/main/apache-commons/java/codec
>>
>> mkout -- version: 1.8
>> dmake: Error: -- `../../unxlngx6.pro/misc/af3c3acf618de6108d65fcdc92b492e1-commons-codec-1.3-src.unpack' not found, and can't be made
>>
>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /home/ariel/AOO/aoo-3.4.1/main/apache-commons/java/codec
>>
>>
>> As building from the source release is broken, this may need a fix and
>> a new RC (hopefully the last one).
>
> attached patch seems to fix the bug.
>
the changes come unfortunately with the Hunspell update. I have reviewed
and applied your patch.
I am currently building a new MacOS and Windows version based on
revision 1365887
@Ariel: can you please build the Linux versions based on this revision
Juergen
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:26:19PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> =============
> Building module apache-commons
> =============
>
> Entering /home/ariel/AOO/aoo-3.4.1/main/apache-commons/java/codec
>
> mkout -- version: 1.8
> dmake: Error: -- `../../unxlngx6.pro/misc/af3c3acf618de6108d65fcdc92b492e1-commons-codec-1.3-src.unpack' not found, and can't be made
>
> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /home/ariel/AOO/aoo-3.4.1/main/apache-commons/java/codec
>
>
> As building from the source release is broken, this may need a fix and
> a new RC (hopefully the last one).
attached patch seems to fix the bug.
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:37:26AM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
> <jo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > I would like to propose that we build now on revision 1365485 and start
> > voting on this when the builds are available.
>
> can you reproduce this while running ./bootstrap ?
>
>
> downloading 3 missing tar balls to
> /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/ext_sources
> downloading to /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/ext_sources/17960f35b2239654ba608cf1f3e256b3-lucene-2.9.4-src.tar.gz.part
> ** GET http://www.us.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/2.9.4/lucene-2.9.4-src.tar.gz
> ==> 200 OK (54s)
> MD5 checksum is OK
> downloading to /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/ext_sources/2e482c7567908d334785ce7d69ddfff7-commons-codec-1.6-src.tar.gz.part
> ** GET http://apache.spinellicreations.com//commons/codec/source/commons-codec-1.6-src.tar.gz
> ==> 200 OK (2s)
> MD5 checksum is OK
> downloading to /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/ext_sources/625ff5f2f968dd908bca43c9469d6e6b-commons-lang-2.4-src.tar.gz.part
> ** GET http://archive.apache.org/dist/commons/lang/source/commons-lang-2.4-src.tar.gz
> ==> 200 OK (4s)
> MD5 checksum is OK
>
>
> This is downloading
>
> lucene-2.9.4-src.tar.gz
> commons-codec-1.6-src.tar.gz
> commons-lang-2.4-src.tar.gz
>
> while on AOO34 branch this dependencies are at different versions:
>
> lucene: 2.3.2
> commons-codec: 1.3
> commons-lang: 2.3
This breaks building from the source release:
./bootstrap
[...]
adding download request for lucene-2.9.4-src.tar.gz
[...]
adding download request for commons-codec-1.6-src.tar.gz
[...]
adding download request for commons-lang-2.4-src.tar.gz
[...]
downloading to /home/ariel/AOO/aoo-3.4.1/ext_sources/17960f35b2239654ba608cf1f3e256b3-lucene-2.9.4-src.tar.gz.part
** GET http://www.us.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/2.9.4/lucene-2.9.4-src.tar.gz ==> 200 OK (44s)
MD5 checksum is OK
[...]
downloading to /home/ariel/AOO/aoo-3.4.1/ext_sources/2e482c7567908d334785ce7d69ddfff7-commons-codec-1.6-src.tar.gz.part
** GET http://apache.spinellicreations.com//commons/codec/source/commons-codec-1.6-src.tar.gz ==> 200 OK (3s)
MD5 checksum is OK
[...]
downloading to /home/ariel/AOO/aoo-3.4.1/ext_sources/625ff5f2f968dd908bca43c9469d6e6b-commons-lang-2.4-src.tar.gz.part
** GET http://archive.apache.org/dist/commons/lang/source/commons-lang-2.4-src.tar.gz ==> 200 OK (5s)
MD5 checksum is OK
[...]
=============
Building module apache-commons
=============
Entering /home/ariel/AOO/aoo-3.4.1/main/apache-commons/java/codec
mkout -- version: 1.8
dmake: Error: -- `../../unxlngx6.pro/misc/af3c3acf618de6108d65fcdc92b492e1-commons-codec-1.3-src.unpack' not found, and can't be made
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /home/ariel/AOO/aoo-3.4.1/main/apache-commons/java/codec
As building from the source release is broken, this may need a fix and
a new RC (hopefully the last one).
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based
on revision 1364583
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012 um 16:37 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
> <jo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > I would like to propose that we build now on revision 1365485 and start
> > voting on this when the builds are available.
> >
>
>
> can you reproduce this while running ./bootstrap ?
>
I have to check it tomorrow, I haven't noticed it when I configured and bootstrapped the new builds.
Juergen
>
>
> downloading 3 missing tar balls to
> /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/ext_sources
> downloading to /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/ext_sources/17960f35b2239654ba608cf1f3e256b3-lucene-2.9.4-src.tar.gz.part
> ** GET http://www.us.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/2.9.4/lucene-2.9.4-src.tar.gz
> ==> 200 OK (54s)
> MD5 checksum is OK
> downloading to /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/ext_sources/2e482c7567908d334785ce7d69ddfff7-commons-codec-1.6-src.tar.gz.part
> ** GET http://apache.spinellicreations.com//commons/codec/source/commons-codec-1.6-src.tar.gz
> ==> 200 OK (2s)
> MD5 checksum is OK
> downloading to /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/ext_sources/625ff5f2f968dd908bca43c9469d6e6b-commons-lang-2.4-src.tar.gz.part
> ** GET http://archive.apache.org/dist/commons/lang/source/commons-lang-2.4-src.tar.gz
> ==> 200 OK (4s)
> MD5 checksum is OK
>
>
> This is downloading
>
> lucene-2.9.4-src.tar.gz
> commons-codec-1.6-src.tar.gz
> commons-lang-2.4-src.tar.gz
>
> while on AOO34 branch this dependencies are at different versions:
>
> lucene: 2.3.2
> commons-codec: 1.3
> commons-lang: 2.3
>
>
> Regards
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
Hi Jürgen,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
<jo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I would like to propose that we build now on revision 1365485 and start
> voting on this when the builds are available.
can you reproduce this while running ./bootstrap ?
downloading 3 missing tar balls to
/build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/ext_sources
downloading to /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/ext_sources/17960f35b2239654ba608cf1f3e256b3-lucene-2.9.4-src.tar.gz.part
** GET http://www.us.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/2.9.4/lucene-2.9.4-src.tar.gz
==> 200 OK (54s)
MD5 checksum is OK
downloading to /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/ext_sources/2e482c7567908d334785ce7d69ddfff7-commons-codec-1.6-src.tar.gz.part
** GET http://apache.spinellicreations.com//commons/codec/source/commons-codec-1.6-src.tar.gz
==> 200 OK (2s)
MD5 checksum is OK
downloading to /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/ext_sources/625ff5f2f968dd908bca43c9469d6e6b-commons-lang-2.4-src.tar.gz.part
** GET http://archive.apache.org/dist/commons/lang/source/commons-lang-2.4-src.tar.gz
==> 200 OK (4s)
MD5 checksum is OK
This is downloading
lucene-2.9.4-src.tar.gz
commons-codec-1.6-src.tar.gz
commons-lang-2.4-src.tar.gz
while on AOO34 branch this dependencies are at different versions:
lucene: 2.3.2
commons-codec: 1.3
commons-lang: 2.3
Regards
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jürgen,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
<jo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I would like to propose that we build now on revision 1365485 and start
> voting on this when the builds are available.
can you reproduce this while running ./bootstrap ?
downloading 3 missing tar balls to
/build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/ext_sources
downloading to /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/ext_sources/17960f35b2239654ba608cf1f3e256b3-lucene-2.9.4-src.tar.gz.part
** GET http://www.us.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/2.9.4/lucene-2.9.4-src.tar.gz
==> 200 OK (54s)
MD5 checksum is OK
downloading to /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/ext_sources/2e482c7567908d334785ce7d69ddfff7-commons-codec-1.6-src.tar.gz.part
** GET http://apache.spinellicreations.com//commons/codec/source/commons-codec-1.6-src.tar.gz
==> 200 OK (2s)
MD5 checksum is OK
downloading to /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/ext_sources/625ff5f2f968dd908bca43c9469d6e6b-commons-lang-2.4-src.tar.gz.part
** GET http://archive.apache.org/dist/commons/lang/source/commons-lang-2.4-src.tar.gz
==> 200 OK (4s)
MD5 checksum is OK
This is downloading
lucene-2.9.4-src.tar.gz
commons-codec-1.6-src.tar.gz
commons-lang-2.4-src.tar.gz
while on AOO34 branch this dependencies are at different versions:
lucene: 2.3.2
commons-codec: 1.3
commons-lang: 2.3
Regards
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/25/12 8:48 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
> <jo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> FYI there are two build breakers, so I guess this build won't work as a RC:
>>>
>>> a) A dependency on comphelper was introduced (rev. 1362893) without
>>> updating the module dependency list on hwpfilter/prj/build.lst:
>>
>> grrr, I didn't run in this problem on windows and Mac
>
> It's the tricky thing of building with more than one process.
>
>>> b) on x86 stlport build breaks:
>>
>> do you mean x86-64 because the x86 builds are already uploaded?
>
> x86 is 32 bits, I mean only this because stlport is not used in 64
> bits (we should get rid of stlport some of these days).
>
I agree and would love to see this addressed soon.
Anyway problem 1 is fixed and problem 2 is no release blocker.
I would like to propose that we build now on revision 1365485 and start
voting on this when the builds are available.
@Ariel: is that ok for you and the Linux builds? What do you expect how
long it will take to upload the files (full install sets + language packs)?
Juergen
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
Hi Jürgen,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
<jo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> FYI there are two build breakers, so I guess this build won't work as a RC:
>>
>> a) A dependency on comphelper was introduced (rev. 1362893) without
>> updating the module dependency list on hwpfilter/prj/build.lst:
>
> grrr, I didn't run in this problem on windows and Mac
It's the tricky thing of building with more than one process.
>> b) on x86 stlport build breaks:
>
> do you mean x86-64 because the x86 builds are already uploaded?
x86 is 32 bits, I mean only this because stlport is not used in 64
bits (we should get rid of stlport some of these days).
Regards
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/24/12 5:26 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
> <jo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On 7/23/12 6:31 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:41:57PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>>>>> To avoid potential confusion this build is intended to become released
>>>>>>> as AOO3.4.1 if no serious issues will be found.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The related voting procedure will be started when we have the builds
>>>>>>> available.
>>>
>>> Then I guess we should build also language packs, shouldn't we?
>>>
>>
>> Let me know when you have uploaded the files, I will adapt the wiki all
>> in once with a small script.
>
> It will take long, it's 13.2 GB.
>
> FYI there are two build breakers, so I guess this build won't work as a RC:
>
> a) A dependency on comphelper was introduced (rev. 1362893) without
> updating the module dependency list on hwpfilter/prj/build.lst:
grrr, I didn't run in this problem on windows and Mac
>
>
> /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hstyle.cpp:29:35:
> error: comphelper/newarray.hxx: No such file or directory
> /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hpara.cpp:
> In member function 'int HWPPara::Read(HWPFile&, unsigned char)':
> /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hpara.cpp:121:
> error: '::comphelper' has not been declared
> /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hpara.cpp:121:
> error: expected primary-expression before '>' token
> /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hpara.cpp:149:
> error: '::comphelper' has not been declared
> /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hpara.cpp:149:
> error: expected primary-expression before '>' token
> /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hpara.cpp:173:
> error: '::comphelper' has not been declared
> /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hpara.cpp:173:
> error: expected primary-expression before '*' token
> /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hpara.cpp:173:
> error: expected primary-expression before '>' token
> dmake: Error code 1, while making '../unxlngi6.pro/slo/hpara.obj'
> /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hstyle.cpp:
> In member function 'bool HWPStyle::Read(HWPFile&)':
> /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hstyle.cpp:135:
> error: '::comphelper' has not been declared
> /build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hstyle.cpp:135:
> error: expected primary-expression before '>' token
>
>
> b) on x86 stlport build breaks:
do you mean x86-64 because the x86 builds are already uploaded?
>
> mkdir -p ../lib/obj/GCC/Release
> g++ -Wl,--hash-style=both -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions
> -Wl,--dynamic-list-cpp-new -Wl,--dynamic-list-cpp-typeinfo
> -D_REENTRANT -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/c++/4.4 -fexceptions
> -ftemplate-depth-32 -I../stlport -Wall -W -Wno-sign-compare
> -Wno-unused -Wno-uninitialized -O2 -fPIC dll_main.cpp -c -o
> ../lib/obj/GCC/Release/dll_main.o
> g++ -Wl,--hash-style=both -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions
> -Wl,--dynamic-list-cpp-new -Wl,--dynamic-list-cpp-typeinfo
> -D_REENTRANT -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/c++/4.4 -fexceptions
> -ftemplate-depth-32 -I../stlport -Wall -W -Wno-sign-compare
> -Wno-unused -Wno-uninitialized -O2 -fPIC fstream.cpp -c -o
> ../lib/obj/GCC/Release/fstream.o
> g++ -Wl,--hash-style=both -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions
> -Wl,--dynamic-list-cpp-new -Wl,--dynamic-list-cpp-typeinfo
> -D_REENTRANT -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/c++/4.4 -fexceptions
> -ftemplate-depth-32 -I../stlport -Wall -W -Wno-sign-compare
> -Wno-unused -Wno-uninitialized -O2 -fPIC strstream.cpp -c -o
> ../lib/obj/GCC/Release/strstream.o
> Assembler messages:
> Fatal error: can't create ../lib/obj/GCC/Release/strstream.o: No such
> file or directory
> make: *** [../lib/obj/GCC/Release/strstream.o] Error 1
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> Assembler messages:
> Fatal error: can't create ../lib/obj/GCC/Release/dll_main.o: No such
> file or directory
> make: *** [../lib/obj/GCC/Release/dll_main.o] Error 1
> Assembler messages:
> Fatal error: can't create ../lib/obj/GCC/Release/fstream.o: No such
> file or directory
> make: *** [../lib/obj/GCC/Release/fstream.o] Error 1
> dmake: Error code 2, while making
> './unxlngi6.pro/misc/build/so_built_so_stlport'
>
> I didn't take a look at this yet.
mmh, very strange we have to look into it. I am not aware of any changes
here.
But you are correct, we probably have to rebuild after fixing this problem.
Juergen
>
> Regards
>
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
Hi Jürgen,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
<jo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 7/23/12 6:31 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:41:57PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>>>> To avoid potential confusion this build is intended to become released
>>>>>> as AOO3.4.1 if no serious issues will be found.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The related voting procedure will be started when we have the builds
>>>>>> available.
>>
>> Then I guess we should build also language packs, shouldn't we?
>>
>
> Let me know when you have uploaded the files, I will adapt the wiki all
> in once with a small script.
It will take long, it's 13.2 GB.
FYI there are two build breakers, so I guess this build won't work as a RC:
a) A dependency on comphelper was introduced (rev. 1362893) without
updating the module dependency list on hwpfilter/prj/build.lst:
/build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hstyle.cpp:29:35:
error: comphelper/newarray.hxx: No such file or directory
/build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hpara.cpp:
In member function 'int HWPPara::Read(HWPFile&, unsigned char)':
/build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hpara.cpp:121:
error: '::comphelper' has not been declared
/build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hpara.cpp:121:
error: expected primary-expression before '>' token
/build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hpara.cpp:149:
error: '::comphelper' has not been declared
/build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hpara.cpp:149:
error: expected primary-expression before '>' token
/build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hpara.cpp:173:
error: '::comphelper' has not been declared
/build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hpara.cpp:173:
error: expected primary-expression before '*' token
/build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hpara.cpp:173:
error: expected primary-expression before '>' token
dmake: Error code 1, while making '../unxlngi6.pro/slo/hpara.obj'
/build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hstyle.cpp:
In member function 'bool HWPStyle::Read(HWPFile&)':
/build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hstyle.cpp:135:
error: '::comphelper' has not been declared
/build/aoo/src/clean/branches/AOO34/main/hwpfilter/source/hstyle.cpp:135:
error: expected primary-expression before '>' token
b) on x86 stlport build breaks:
mkdir -p ../lib/obj/GCC/Release
g++ -Wl,--hash-style=both -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions
-Wl,--dynamic-list-cpp-new -Wl,--dynamic-list-cpp-typeinfo
-D_REENTRANT -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/c++/4.4 -fexceptions
-ftemplate-depth-32 -I../stlport -Wall -W -Wno-sign-compare
-Wno-unused -Wno-uninitialized -O2 -fPIC dll_main.cpp -c -o
../lib/obj/GCC/Release/dll_main.o
g++ -Wl,--hash-style=both -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions
-Wl,--dynamic-list-cpp-new -Wl,--dynamic-list-cpp-typeinfo
-D_REENTRANT -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/c++/4.4 -fexceptions
-ftemplate-depth-32 -I../stlport -Wall -W -Wno-sign-compare
-Wno-unused -Wno-uninitialized -O2 -fPIC fstream.cpp -c -o
../lib/obj/GCC/Release/fstream.o
g++ -Wl,--hash-style=both -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions
-Wl,--dynamic-list-cpp-new -Wl,--dynamic-list-cpp-typeinfo
-D_REENTRANT -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/c++/4.4 -fexceptions
-ftemplate-depth-32 -I../stlport -Wall -W -Wno-sign-compare
-Wno-unused -Wno-uninitialized -O2 -fPIC strstream.cpp -c -o
../lib/obj/GCC/Release/strstream.o
Assembler messages:
Fatal error: can't create ../lib/obj/GCC/Release/strstream.o: No such
file or directory
make: *** [../lib/obj/GCC/Release/strstream.o] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Assembler messages:
Fatal error: can't create ../lib/obj/GCC/Release/dll_main.o: No such
file or directory
make: *** [../lib/obj/GCC/Release/dll_main.o] Error 1
Assembler messages:
Fatal error: can't create ../lib/obj/GCC/Release/fstream.o: No such
file or directory
make: *** [../lib/obj/GCC/Release/fstream.o] Error 1
dmake: Error code 2, while making
'./unxlngi6.pro/misc/build/so_built_so_stlport'
I didn't take a look at this yet.
Regards
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/23/12 6:31 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:41:57PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>>> To avoid potential confusion this build is intended to become released
>>>>> as AOO3.4.1 if no serious issues will be found.
>>>>>
>>>>> The related voting procedure will be started when we have the builds
>>>>> available.
>
> Then I guess we should build also language packs, shouldn't we?
>
Let me know when you have uploaded the files, I will adapt the wiki all
in once with a small script.
Juergen
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by "Rony G. Flatscher (Apache)" <ro...@apache.org>.
On 24.07.2012 18:45, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hi Rony,
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache)
> <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Probably a stupid question (tried cwiki search and google to no avail): what is the current URL for
>> the download page for the 3.4.1 RCs (currently interested in the MacOS version)?
>>
> if nothing is broken, it should be as easy as going to the main download page:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/download/
>
> The last item will lead you to
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
Hi Ariel,
thank you *very* much, will bookmark this link!
Best regards,
---rony
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
Hi Rony,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache)
<ro...@apache.org> wrote:
> Probably a stupid question (tried cwiki search and google to no avail): what is the current URL for
> the download page for the 3.4.1 RCs (currently interested in the MacOS version)?
>
if nothing is broken, it should be as easy as going to the main download page:
http://www.openoffice.org/download/
The last item will lead you to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
Regards
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by "Rony G. Flatscher (Apache)" <ro...@apache.org>.
On 24.07.2012 11:24, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 7/24/12 10:58 AM, RGB ES wrote:
>> 2012/7/24 Rory O'Farrell <of...@iol.ie>:
>>
>>> It looks as if the entire column of Windows rc candidates does not have correct permissions. I tried four or five in that column ad got 403 Forbidden errors. The Ubuntu candidate D/Led OK.
>>>
>> That's because the builds are not ready yet: only the 32 bits debs are
>> ready so a bit of patience is needed ;)
>>
>> Regards
>> Ricardo
>>
> In general we put a short mail here on the list when the builds are
> available
>
> MacOS + Windows should be available and I am currently updating the wiki.
Probably a stupid question (tried cwiki search and google to no avail): what is the current URL for
the download page for the 3.4.1 RCs (currently interested in the MacOS version)?
---rony
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by "Rony G. Flatscher" <Ro...@wu-wien.ac.at>.
On 24.07.2012 11:24, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 7/24/12 10:58 AM, RGB ES wrote:
>> 2012/7/24 Rory O'Farrell <of...@iol.ie>:
>>
>>> It looks as if the entire column of Windows rc candidates does not have correct permissions. I tried four or five in that column ad got 403 Forbidden errors. The Ubuntu candidate D/Led OK.
>>>
>> That's because the builds are not ready yet: only the 32 bits debs are
>> ready so a bit of patience is needed ;)
>>
>> Regards
>> Ricardo
>>
> In general we put a short mail here on the list when the builds are
> available
>
> MacOS + Windows should be available and I am currently updating the wiki.
Probably a stupid question (tried cwiki search and google to no avail): what is the current URL for
the download page for the 3.4.1 RCs (currently interested in the MacOS version)?
---rony
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/24/12 10:58 AM, RGB ES wrote:
> 2012/7/24 Rory O'Farrell <of...@iol.ie>:
>
>> It looks as if the entire column of Windows rc candidates does not have correct permissions. I tried four or five in that column ad got 403 Forbidden errors. The Ubuntu candidate D/Led OK.
>>
>
> That's because the builds are not ready yet: only the 32 bits debs are
> ready so a bit of patience is needed ;)
>
> Regards
> Ricardo
>
In general we put a short mail here on the list when the builds are
available
MacOS + Windows should be available and I am currently updating the wiki.
Juergen
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by RGB ES <rg...@gmail.com>.
2012/7/24 Rory O'Farrell <of...@iol.ie>:
> It looks as if the entire column of Windows rc candidates does not have correct permissions. I tried four or five in that column ad got 403 Forbidden errors. The Ubuntu candidate D/Led OK.
>
That's because the builds are not ready yet: only the 32 bits debs are
ready so a bit of patience is needed ;)
Regards
Ricardo
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Rory O'Farrell <of...@iol.ie>.
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:21:32 +0800
Yan Ji <ya...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your clarify. we will also verify the language pack.
>
> I notice that the RC build is now available. But same as previous build, I cannot download Windows build. It saids: 403 Forbidden. Would you please help check the file permission?
>
>
>
> Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji
>
> On Jul 24, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
> > On 7/24/12 3:24 AM, Ji Yan wrote:
> >> Jurgen,
> >>
> >> Will this build provide language pack?
> >>
> >> 2012/7/24 Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:41:57PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>>>>>> To avoid potential confusion this build is intended to become
> >>> released
> >>>>>>> as AOO3.4.1 if no serious issues will be found.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The related voting procedure will be started when we have the builds
> >>>>>>> available.
> >>>
> >>> Then I guess we should build also language packs, shouldn't we?
> >>>
> >
> > yes, we should build language packs as well.
> >
> > Sorry for being not clear enough
> >
> > Juergen
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> --
> >>> Ariel Constenla-Haile
> >>> La Plata, Argentina
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
It looks as if the entire column of Windows rc candidates does not have correct permissions. I tried four or five in that column ad got 403 Forbidden errors. The Ubuntu candidate D/Led OK.
--
Rory O'Farrell <of...@iol.ie>
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on revision 1364583
Posted by Yan Ji <ya...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for your clarify. we will also verify the language pack.
I notice that the RC build is now available. But same as previous build, I cannot download Windows build. It saids: 403 Forbidden. Would you please help check the file permission?
Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji
On Jul 24, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 7/24/12 3:24 AM, Ji Yan wrote:
>> Jurgen,
>>
>> Will this build provide language pack?
>>
>> 2012/7/24 Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>
>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:41:57PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>>>>> To avoid potential confusion this build is intended to become
>>> released
>>>>>>> as AOO3.4.1 if no serious issues will be found.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The related voting procedure will be started when we have the builds
>>>>>>> available.
>>>
>>> Then I guess we should build also language packs, shouldn't we?
>>>
>
> yes, we should build language packs as well.
>
> Sorry for being not clear enough
>
> Juergen
>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> --
>>> Ariel Constenla-Haile
>>> La Plata, Argentina
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/24/12 3:24 AM, Ji Yan wrote:
> Jurgen,
>
> Will this build provide language pack?
>
> 2012/7/24 Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>
>
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:41:57PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>>>> To avoid potential confusion this build is intended to become
>> released
>>>>>> as AOO3.4.1 if no serious issues will be found.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The related voting procedure will be started when we have the builds
>>>>>> available.
>>
>> Then I guess we should build also language packs, shouldn't we?
>>
yes, we should build language packs as well.
Sorry for being not clear enough
Juergen
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> --
>> Ariel Constenla-Haile
>> La Plata, Argentina
>>
>
>
>
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Ji Yan <ya...@gmail.com>.
Jurgen,
Will this build provide language pack?
2012/7/24 Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:41:57PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > >>> To avoid potential confusion this build is intended to become
> released
> > >>> as AOO3.4.1 if no serious issues will be found.
> > >>>
> > >>> The related voting procedure will be started when we have the builds
> > >>> available.
>
> Then I guess we should build also language packs, shouldn't we?
>
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Ariel Constenla-Haile
> La Plata, Argentina
>
--
Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:41:57PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>> To avoid potential confusion this build is intended to become released
> >>> as AOO3.4.1 if no serious issues will be found.
> >>>
> >>> The related voting procedure will be started when we have the builds
> >>> available.
Then I guess we should build also language packs, shouldn't we?
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/23/12 2:04 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 7/23/12 2:01 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 7/23/12 1:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to propose the next build for AOO 3.4.1 based on revision
>>> 1364583.
>>>
>>> To avoid potential confusion this build is intended to become released
>>> as AOO3.4.1 if no serious issues will be found.
>>>
>>> The related voting procedure will be started when we have the builds
>>> available.
>>>
>>> Juergen
>>>
>>
>> sorry my mistake I read issue 119229 not careful enough and integrate
>> only the patch for the Spanish dictionary but not the fix for the
>> extension script. I will correct this ...
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>
> The next build should be based on revision 1364591
>
@Ariel: I think we can reduce the number of checksums to md5, sha256 and
of course the signature (asc). sha256 because we used it to get AOO
white labeled in some virus scanners
I hope we get a solution for our code signing request in the near future
that we help us with virus scanners on Windows in general and makes our
binaries looking more professional.
Juergen
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/23/12 2:01 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 7/23/12 1:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose the next build for AOO 3.4.1 based on revision
>> 1364583.
>>
>> To avoid potential confusion this build is intended to become released
>> as AOO3.4.1 if no serious issues will be found.
>>
>> The related voting procedure will be started when we have the builds
>> available.
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>
> sorry my mistake I read issue 119229 not careful enough and integrate
> only the patch for the Spanish dictionary but not the fix for the
> extension script. I will correct this ...
>
> Juergen
>
The next build should be based on revision 1364591
Sorry for the confusion
Juergen
Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on
revision 1364583
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/23/12 1:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the next build for AOO 3.4.1 based on revision
> 1364583.
>
> To avoid potential confusion this build is intended to become released
> as AOO3.4.1 if no serious issues will be found.
>
> The related voting procedure will be started when we have the builds
> available.
>
> Juergen
>
sorry my mistake I read issue 119229 not careful enough and integrate
only the patch for the Spanish dictionary but not the fix for the
extension script. I will correct this ...
Juergen