You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to xml-commons-dev@xerces.apache.org by Shane Curcuru <sh...@yahoo.com> on 2003/10/29 03:21:08 UTC
Resolver component release 1.1 coming up
Since we've had a Resolver beta 1.1b1 out for a while now with no
complaints, as soon as I have time I plan to bump the version number to 1.1
and make an official release. I'll make sure there's both a Version class
available as well as sticking the version number in the jar manifest.
Any other comments/requests? Hopefully the release will be at the
appropriate time for the Ant community to version-match with it for their
1.6 release.
Sorry about the Xalan issue: I was hoping someone from that team could
comment. Resolver is just a pretty simple service provider: I think it's
up to the applications that use it to ensure the correct one gets plugged
into the right places (i.e. TransformerFactory vs. Transformers). If I get
free time (ha!) I'll see if I can get someone else to look into it.
I'd love to get at least a simplistic Resolver automated test running, but
don't have time right now.
- Shane
Re: Resolver component release 1.1 coming up
Posted by "Mark R. Diggory" <md...@latte.harvard.edu>.
I've been using it in combination with Xerces, Xalan and Saxon via JAXP
and it works wonderfully, I have absolutely no complaints or bug encounters.
Cheers!
Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Since we've had a Resolver beta 1.1b1 out for a while now with no
> complaints, as soon as I have time I plan to bump the version number to
> 1.1 and make an official release. I'll make sure there's both a Version
> class available as well as sticking the version number in the jar manifest.
>
> Any other comments/requests? Hopefully the release will be at the
> appropriate time for the Ant community to version-match with it for
> their 1.6 release.
>
> Sorry about the Xalan issue: I was hoping someone from that team could
> comment. Resolver is just a pretty simple service provider: I think
> it's up to the applications that use it to ensure the correct one gets
> plugged into the right places (i.e. TransformerFactory vs.
> Transformers). If I get free time (ha!) I'll see if I can get someone
> else to look into it.
>
> I'd love to get at least a simplistic Resolver automated test running,
> but don't have time right now.
>
> - Shane
>
--
Mark Diggory
Software Developer
Harvard MIT Data Center
http://www.hmdc.harvard.edu