You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by "Alex Harui (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/12/30 10:00:38 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (LEGAL-213) Is Saxon ok to use
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Alex Harui updated LEGAL-213:
-----------------------------
Attachment: UNICODE.txt
THAI.txt
LICENSE.txt
LEGAL.txt
JAMESCLARK.txt
GPL+CLASSPATH.txt
FRIJTERS.txt
CERN.txt
APACHE-XERCES.txt
APACHE-RESOLVER.txt
APACHE-ANT.txt
These are the notices that come in the distribution. CERN seems to require approval from legal-discuss. AFAICT, the GPL+CLASSPATH code is not in the jar we are using so that NOTICE doesn't apply.
> Is Saxon ok to use
> ------------------
>
> Key: LEGAL-213
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-213
> Project: Legal Discuss
> Issue Type: Question
> Reporter: Alex Harui
> Attachments: APACHE-ANT.txt, APACHE-RESOLVER.txt, APACHE-XERCES.txt, CERN.txt, FRIJTERS.txt, GPL+CLASSPATH.txt, JAMESCLARK.txt, LEGAL.txt, LICENSE.txt, THAI.txt, UNICODE.txt
>
>
> Saxon looked like it was MPL, but deeper investigation shows a set of NOTICE files that make it seem like there are non-Apache-compatible dependencies.
> Also, it is hard to tell which notices actually apply to the one jar Flex actually uses (saxon9.jar)
> We are using an older version than what is described here:
> http://saxonica.com/html/documentation/conditions/redistributed.html
> But I think some of the information still applies.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org