You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Bernd <ec...@zusammenkunft.net> on 2015/03/24 13:18:25 UTC
State of JAX-RS 2.0 spec
Hello,
I noticed that the JAX-RS Spec Pom is not listed on the Maven site (
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/specs/index.html under "Modules"). When I
look into the source repository I see in the POM that it puts "1.1" in the
Bundle manifest and OSGi exports. So I wonder if this project is already
"production ready" or abandoned.
Another question, the NOTICE file does not mention anything about the
source of the code. Is it typically decided that there is no need to
mention the license of the spec PDFs or the RI files?
Gruss
Bernd
Re: State of JAX-RS 2.0 spec
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
> On Mar 24, 2015, at 10:24 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> bundle manifest is surely not correct - think nobody tested it in osgi yet
Most likely cause those using JAX-RS 2.0 in OSGi are using the servicemix bundle:
org.apache.servicemix.specs.jsr339-api-2.0
which is based on the reference impl jar. At least that’s what CXF is using.
Dan
> but for other use cases it should be fine. Sources were written @apache (and just compared to the spec, not copied from the spec) so we shouldnt need to add the RI in the notice AFAIK.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber
>
> 2015-03-24 13:18 GMT+01:00 Bernd <ec...@zusammenkunft.net>:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that the JAX-RS Spec Pom is not listed on the Maven site (http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/specs/index.html under "Modules"). When I look into the source repository I see in the POM that it puts "1.1" in the Bundle manifest and OSGi exports. So I wonder if this project is already "production ready" or abandoned.
>
> Another question, the NOTICE file does not mention anything about the source of the code. Is it typically decided that there is no need to mention the license of the spec PDFs or the RI files?
>
> Gruss
> Bernd
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: State of JAX-RS 2.0 spec
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi
bundle manifest is surely not correct - think nobody tested it in osgi yet
but for other use cases it should be fine. Sources were written @apache
(and just compared to the spec, not copied from the spec) so we shouldnt
need to add the RI in the notice AFAIK.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>
2015-03-24 13:18 GMT+01:00 Bernd <ec...@zusammenkunft.net>:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that the JAX-RS Spec Pom is not listed on the Maven site (
> http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/specs/index.html under "Modules"). When
> I look into the source repository I see in the POM that it puts "1.1" in
> the Bundle manifest and OSGi exports. So I wonder if this project is
> already "production ready" or abandoned.
>
> Another question, the NOTICE file does not mention anything about the
> source of the code. Is it typically decided that there is no need to
> mention the license of the spec PDFs or the RI files?
>
> Gruss
> Bernd
>