You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org by "Rushabh S Shah (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/08/07 00:20:04 UTC
[jira] [Created] (HDFS-8872) Reporting of missing blocks is
different in fsck and namenode ui/metasave
Rushabh S Shah created HDFS-8872:
------------------------------------
Summary: Reporting of missing blocks is different in fsck and namenode ui/metasave
Key: HDFS-8872
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8872
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.6.0
Reporter: Rushabh S Shah
Assignee: Rushabh S Shah
Fix For: 2.7.2
Namenode ui and metasave will not report a block as missing if the only replica is on decommissioning/decomissioned node where fsck will show it as MISSING.
Since decommissioned node can be formatted/removed anytime, we can actually lose the block.
Its better to alert on namenode ui if the only copy is on decomissioned/decommissioning node.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)