You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@kafka.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/03/02 20:37:59 UTC

[GitHub] [kafka] cmccabe commented on a change in pull request #10184: MINOR: enable topic deletion in the KIP-500 controller

cmccabe commented on a change in pull request #10184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10184#discussion_r585891911



##########
File path: core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ControllerApis.scala
##########
@@ -154,6 +161,147 @@ class ControllerApis(val requestChannel: RequestChannel,
       requestThrottleMs => createResponseCallback(requestThrottleMs))
   }
 
+  def handleDeleteTopics(request: RequestChannel.Request): Unit = {
+    val responses = deleteTopics(request.body[DeleteTopicsRequest].data(),
+      request.context.apiVersion(),
+      authHelper.authorize(request.context, DELETE, CLUSTER, CLUSTER_NAME),
+      names => authHelper.filterByAuthorized(request.context, DESCRIBE, TOPIC, names)(n => n),
+      names => authHelper.filterByAuthorized(request.context, DELETE, TOPIC, names)(n => n))
+    requestHelper.sendResponseMaybeThrottle(request, throttleTimeMs => {
+      val responseData = new DeleteTopicsResponseData().
+        setResponses(new DeletableTopicResultCollection(responses.iterator())).
+        setThrottleTimeMs(throttleTimeMs)
+      new DeleteTopicsResponse(responseData)
+    })
+  }
+
+  def deleteTopics(request: DeleteTopicsRequestData,
+                   apiVersion: Int,
+                   hasClusterAuth: Boolean,
+                   getDescribableTopics: Iterable[String] => Set[String],
+                   getDeletableTopics: Iterable[String] => Set[String]): util.List[DeletableTopicResult] = {
+    if (!config.deleteTopicEnable) {
+      if (apiVersion < 3) {
+        throw new InvalidRequestException("Topic deletion is disabled.")
+      } else {
+        throw new TopicDeletionDisabledException()
+      }
+    }
+    val responses = new util.ArrayList[DeletableTopicResult]
+    val duplicatedTopicNames = new util.HashSet[String]
+    val topicNamesToResolve = new util.HashSet[String]
+    val topicIdsToResolve = new util.HashSet[Uuid]
+    val duplicatedTopicIds = new util.HashSet[Uuid]
+
+    def appendResponse(name: String, id: Uuid, error: ApiError): Unit = {
+      responses.add(new DeletableTopicResult().
+        setName(name).
+        setTopicId(id).
+        setErrorCode(error.error().code()).
+        setErrorMessage(error.message()))
+    }
+
+    def maybeAppendToTopicNamesToResolve(name: String): Unit = {
+      if (duplicatedTopicNames.contains(name) || !topicNamesToResolve.add(name)) {
+        appendResponse(name, ZERO_UUID, new ApiError(INVALID_REQUEST, "Duplicate topic name."))
+        topicNamesToResolve.remove(name)
+        duplicatedTopicNames.add(name)
+      }
+    }
+
+    def maybeAppendToIdsToResolve(id: Uuid): Unit = {
+      if (duplicatedTopicIds.contains(id) || !topicIdsToResolve.add(id)) {
+        appendResponse(null, id, new ApiError(INVALID_REQUEST, "Duplicate topic ID."))
+        topicIdsToResolve.remove(id)
+        duplicatedTopicIds.add(id)
+      }
+    }
+
+    request.topicNames().iterator().asScala.foreach(maybeAppendToTopicNamesToResolve)
+
+    request.topics().iterator().asScala.foreach {
+      topic => if (topic.name() == null) {
+        if (topic.topicId.equals(ZERO_UUID)) {
+          appendResponse(null, ZERO_UUID, new ApiError(INVALID_REQUEST,
+            "Neither topic name nor id were specified."))
+        } else {
+          maybeAppendToIdsToResolve(topic.topicId())
+        }
+      } else {
+        if (topic.topicId().equals(ZERO_UUID)) {
+          maybeAppendToTopicNamesToResolve(topic.name())
+        } else {
+          appendResponse(topic.name(), topic.topicId(), new ApiError(INVALID_REQUEST,
+            "You may not specify both topic name and topic id."))
+        }
+      }
+    }
+
+    val idToName = new util.HashMap[Uuid, String]
+
+    def maybeAppendToIdToName(id: Uuid, name: String): Unit = {
+      if (duplicatedTopicIds.contains(id) || idToName.put(id, name) != null) {
+          appendResponse(name, id, new ApiError(INVALID_REQUEST,
+              "The same topic was specified by name and by id."))
+          idToName.remove(id)
+          duplicatedTopicIds.add(id)
+      }
+    }
+    controller.findTopicIds(topicNamesToResolve).get().asScala.foreach {
+      case (name, idOrError) => if (idOrError.isError) {
+        appendResponse(name, ZERO_UUID, idOrError.error())
+      } else {
+        maybeAppendToIdToName(idOrError.result(), name)
+      }
+    }
+    controller.findTopicNames(topicIdsToResolve).get().asScala.foreach {
+      case (id, nameOrError) => if (nameOrError.isError) {
+        appendResponse(null, id, nameOrError.error())
+      } else {
+        maybeAppendToIdToName(id, nameOrError.result())
+      }
+    }
+
+    if (!hasClusterAuth) {
+      val authorizedDescribeTopics = getDescribableTopics(idToName.values().asScala)
+      val authorizedDeleteTopics = getDeletableTopics(idToName.values().asScala)
+      val iterator = idToName.entrySet().iterator()
+      while (iterator.hasNext) {
+        val entry = iterator.next()
+        val topicName = entry.getValue
+        if (!authorizedDeleteTopics.contains(topicName)) {
+          val topicId = entry.getKey
+          if (!authorizedDescribeTopics.contains(topicName)) {
+            // If the user is not authorized to describe the topic, we pretend that it

Review comment:
       You're right, the earlier list was not quite right. I've revised this a bit. It's now:
   
   ```
   no name or id => INVALID_REQUEST
   
   duplicate name or id => INVALID_REQUEST
   
   can't resolve topic id => UNKNOWN_TOPIC_ID
   
   can't locate topic name => UNKNOWN_TOPIC_OR_PARTITION
   
   no delete permission, no describe permission => UNKNOWN_TOPIC_ID (if topic id was provided) or UNKNOWN_TOPIC_OR_PARTITION (if topic name was provided)
   
   no delete permission, describe permission => TOPIC_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED with both name and id filled out correctly
   ```
   
   The new code should implement this correctly...




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org