[DISCUSS] MiNiFi C++ Initial Release - cpp-0.0.1

[Aldrin Piri <al...@gmail.com>]

Hey folks,

There's been great efforts to get an initial working implementation of
MiNiFi in C++.  This currently provides a great start on the core
functionalities that the Java equivalent provides.  Perhaps the neatest of
all these items is the C++ implementation of the Site to Site protocol
allowing transmission from a native instance to the NiFi we have all come
to use and love in a more bite-sized binary.

To that end and to aid in making the MiNiFi effort a bit more concrete, I
would like to get a vote started on 0.0.1 (JIRA cpp-0.0.1) in the next few
days and would be happy to act as the RM. There are still a few issues to
tackle mostly tailored around documentation

The hope is that with a Java and C++ implementation in hand there will be a
larger foundation on which people can get involved and participate.  This
is especially crucial as we start expanding the framework, look to solidify
APIs, and consider protocols to facilitate the design and implementation of
centralized management and bi-directional communications.

There is still much to be done both with our MiNiFi agent implementations
and everything that follows.  This marks another nice milestone of progress
and will further generate a multitude of avenues for people to get
involved.

Looking forward to the new possibilities and challenges ahead.

--Aldrin

Re: [DISCUSS] MiNiFi C++ Initial Release - cpp-0.0.1

[Yolanda Davis <yo...@gmail.com>]

+1 !

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Aldrin Piri <al...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey folks,
>
> There's been great efforts to get an initial working implementation of
> MiNiFi in C++.  This currently provides a great start on the core
> functionalities that the Java equivalent provides.  Perhaps the neatest of
> all these items is the C++ implementation of the Site to Site protocol
> allowing transmission from a native instance to the NiFi we have all come
> to use and love in a more bite-sized binary.
>
> To that end and to aid in making the MiNiFi effort a bit more concrete, I
> would like to get a vote started on 0.0.1 (JIRA cpp-0.0.1) in the next few
> days and would be happy to act as the RM. There are still a few issues to
> tackle mostly tailored around documentation
>
> The hope is that with a Java and C++ implementation in hand there will be a
> larger foundation on which people can get involved and participate.  This
> is especially crucial as we start expanding the framework, look to solidify
> APIs, and consider protocols to facilitate the design and implementation of
> centralized management and bi-directional communications.
>
> There is still much to be done both with our MiNiFi agent implementations
> and everything that follows.  This marks another nice milestone of progress
> and will further generate a multitude of avenues for people to get
> involved.
>
> Looking forward to the new possibilities and challenges ahead.
>
> --Aldrin
>



-- 
--
yolanda.m.davis@gmail.com
@YolandaMDavis

Re: [DISCUSS] MiNiFi C++ Initial Release - cpp-0.0.1

[Jeff <jt...@gmail.com>]

+1, the possibilities this opens up are immense!

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:12 PM Andy LoPresto <al...@apache.org> wrote:

> Andy++
>
> Andy LoPresto
> alopresto@apache.org
> *alopresto.apache@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com>*
> PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69
>
> On Aug 5, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Mark Payne <ma...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would be a +1. Very cool to see this reaching this stage!
>
> On Aug 4, 2016, at 11:42 PM, Aldrin Piri <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> There's been great efforts to get an initial working implementation of
> MiNiFi in C++.  This currently provides a great start on the core
> functionalities that the Java equivalent provides.  Perhaps the neatest of
> all these items is the C++ implementation of the Site to Site protocol
> allowing transmission from a native instance to the NiFi we have all come
> to use and love in a more bite-sized binary.
>
> To that end and to aid in making the MiNiFi effort a bit more concrete, I
> would like to get a vote started on 0.0.1 (JIRA cpp-0.0.1) in the next few
> days and would be happy to act as the RM. There are still a few issues to
> tackle mostly tailored around documentation
>
> The hope is that with a Java and C++ implementation in hand there will be a
> larger foundation on which people can get involved and participate.  This
> is especially crucial as we start expanding the framework, look to solidify
> APIs, and consider protocols to facilitate the design and implementation of
> centralized management and bi-directional communications.
>
> There is still much to be done both with our MiNiFi agent implementations
> and everything that follows.  This marks another nice milestone of progress
> and will further generate a multitude of avenues for people to get
> involved.
>
> Looking forward to the new possibilities and challenges ahead.
>
> --Aldrin
>
>
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] MiNiFi C++ Initial Release - cpp-0.0.1

[Andy LoPresto <al...@apache.org>]

Andy++

Andy LoPresto
alopresto@apache.org
alopresto.apache@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69

> On Aug 5, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Mark Payne <ma...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I would be a +1. Very cool to see this reaching this stage!
> 
>> On Aug 4, 2016, at 11:42 PM, Aldrin Piri <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hey folks,
>> 
>> There's been great efforts to get an initial working implementation of
>> MiNiFi in C++.  This currently provides a great start on the core
>> functionalities that the Java equivalent provides.  Perhaps the neatest of
>> all these items is the C++ implementation of the Site to Site protocol
>> allowing transmission from a native instance to the NiFi we have all come
>> to use and love in a more bite-sized binary.
>> 
>> To that end and to aid in making the MiNiFi effort a bit more concrete, I
>> would like to get a vote started on 0.0.1 (JIRA cpp-0.0.1) in the next few
>> days and would be happy to act as the RM. There are still a few issues to
>> tackle mostly tailored around documentation
>> 
>> The hope is that with a Java and C++ implementation in hand there will be a
>> larger foundation on which people can get involved and participate.  This
>> is especially crucial as we start expanding the framework, look to solidify
>> APIs, and consider protocols to facilitate the design and implementation of
>> centralized management and bi-directional communications.
>> 
>> There is still much to be done both with our MiNiFi agent implementations
>> and everything that follows.  This marks another nice milestone of progress
>> and will further generate a multitude of avenues for people to get
>> involved.
>> 
>> Looking forward to the new possibilities and challenges ahead.
>> 
>> --Aldrin
> 

Re: [DISCUSS] MiNiFi C++ Initial Release - cpp-0.0.1

[Mark Payne <ma...@hotmail.com>]

I would be a +1. Very cool to see this reaching this stage!

> On Aug 4, 2016, at 11:42 PM, Aldrin Piri <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hey folks,
> 
> There's been great efforts to get an initial working implementation of
> MiNiFi in C++.  This currently provides a great start on the core
> functionalities that the Java equivalent provides.  Perhaps the neatest of
> all these items is the C++ implementation of the Site to Site protocol
> allowing transmission from a native instance to the NiFi we have all come
> to use and love in a more bite-sized binary.
> 
> To that end and to aid in making the MiNiFi effort a bit more concrete, I
> would like to get a vote started on 0.0.1 (JIRA cpp-0.0.1) in the next few
> days and would be happy to act as the RM. There are still a few issues to
> tackle mostly tailored around documentation
> 
> The hope is that with a Java and C++ implementation in hand there will be a
> larger foundation on which people can get involved and participate.  This
> is especially crucial as we start expanding the framework, look to solidify
> APIs, and consider protocols to facilitate the design and implementation of
> centralized management and bi-directional communications.
> 
> There is still much to be done both with our MiNiFi agent implementations
> and everything that follows.  This marks another nice milestone of progress
> and will further generate a multitude of avenues for people to get
> involved.
> 
> Looking forward to the new possibilities and challenges ahead.
> 
> --Aldrin

Re: [DISCUSS] MiNiFi C++ Initial Release - cpp-0.0.1

[Andrew Psaltis <ps...@gmail.com>]

+1 a fantastic step forward. Will be great to see how close the the true
edge this can go ;)

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Pierre Villard <pi...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1, awesome!
>
> 2016-08-05 6:16 GMT+02:00 Matt Burgess <ma...@gmail.com>:
>
> > +1, also we need documentation on the S2S protocol so we can further
> > extend the reach (Go, Python, Erlang/Elixir, etc)
> >
> >
> > > On Aug 4, 2016, at 11:42 PM, Aldrin Piri <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey folks,
> > >
> > > There's been great efforts to get an initial working implementation of
> > > MiNiFi in C++.  This currently provides a great start on the core
> > > functionalities that the Java equivalent provides.  Perhaps the neatest
> > of
> > > all these items is the C++ implementation of the Site to Site protocol
> > > allowing transmission from a native instance to the NiFi we have all
> come
> > > to use and love in a more bite-sized binary.
> > >
> > > To that end and to aid in making the MiNiFi effort a bit more
> concrete, I
> > > would like to get a vote started on 0.0.1 (JIRA cpp-0.0.1) in the next
> > few
> > > days and would be happy to act as the RM. There are still a few issues
> to
> > > tackle mostly tailored around documentation
> > >
> > > The hope is that with a Java and C++ implementation in hand there will
> > be a
> > > larger foundation on which people can get involved and participate.
> This
> > > is especially crucial as we start expanding the framework, look to
> > solidify
> > > APIs, and consider protocols to facilitate the design and
> implementation
> > of
> > > centralized management and bi-directional communications.
> > >
> > > There is still much to be done both with our MiNiFi agent
> implementations
> > > and everything that follows.  This marks another nice milestone of
> > progress
> > > and will further generate a multitude of avenues for people to get
> > > involved.
> > >
> > > Looking forward to the new possibilities and challenges ahead.
> > >
> > > --Aldrin
> >
>



-- 
Thanks,
Andrew

Subscribe to my book: Streaming Data <http://manning.com/psaltis>
<https://www.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-psaltis/1/17b/306>
twiiter: @itmdata <http://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=itmdata>

Re: [DISCUSS] MiNiFi C++ Initial Release - cpp-0.0.1

[Pierre Villard <pi...@gmail.com>]

+1, awesome!

2016-08-05 6:16 GMT+02:00 Matt Burgess <ma...@gmail.com>:

> +1, also we need documentation on the S2S protocol so we can further
> extend the reach (Go, Python, Erlang/Elixir, etc)
>
>
> > On Aug 4, 2016, at 11:42 PM, Aldrin Piri <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > There's been great efforts to get an initial working implementation of
> > MiNiFi in C++.  This currently provides a great start on the core
> > functionalities that the Java equivalent provides.  Perhaps the neatest
> of
> > all these items is the C++ implementation of the Site to Site protocol
> > allowing transmission from a native instance to the NiFi we have all come
> > to use and love in a more bite-sized binary.
> >
> > To that end and to aid in making the MiNiFi effort a bit more concrete, I
> > would like to get a vote started on 0.0.1 (JIRA cpp-0.0.1) in the next
> few
> > days and would be happy to act as the RM. There are still a few issues to
> > tackle mostly tailored around documentation
> >
> > The hope is that with a Java and C++ implementation in hand there will
> be a
> > larger foundation on which people can get involved and participate.  This
> > is especially crucial as we start expanding the framework, look to
> solidify
> > APIs, and consider protocols to facilitate the design and implementation
> of
> > centralized management and bi-directional communications.
> >
> > There is still much to be done both with our MiNiFi agent implementations
> > and everything that follows.  This marks another nice milestone of
> progress
> > and will further generate a multitude of avenues for people to get
> > involved.
> >
> > Looking forward to the new possibilities and challenges ahead.
> >
> > --Aldrin
>

Re: [DISCUSS] MiNiFi C++ Initial Release - cpp-0.0.1

[Matt Burgess <ma...@gmail.com>]

+1, also we need documentation on the S2S protocol so we can further extend the reach (Go, Python, Erlang/Elixir, etc)


> On Aug 4, 2016, at 11:42 PM, Aldrin Piri <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hey folks,
> 
> There's been great efforts to get an initial working implementation of
> MiNiFi in C++.  This currently provides a great start on the core
> functionalities that the Java equivalent provides.  Perhaps the neatest of
> all these items is the C++ implementation of the Site to Site protocol
> allowing transmission from a native instance to the NiFi we have all come
> to use and love in a more bite-sized binary.
> 
> To that end and to aid in making the MiNiFi effort a bit more concrete, I
> would like to get a vote started on 0.0.1 (JIRA cpp-0.0.1) in the next few
> days and would be happy to act as the RM. There are still a few issues to
> tackle mostly tailored around documentation
> 
> The hope is that with a Java and C++ implementation in hand there will be a
> larger foundation on which people can get involved and participate.  This
> is especially crucial as we start expanding the framework, look to solidify
> APIs, and consider protocols to facilitate the design and implementation of
> centralized management and bi-directional communications.
> 
> There is still much to be done both with our MiNiFi agent implementations
> and everything that follows.  This marks another nice milestone of progress
> and will further generate a multitude of avenues for people to get
> involved.
> 
> Looking forward to the new possibilities and challenges ahead.
> 
> --Aldrin