You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@maven.apache.org by Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr> on 2020/08/01 06:28:09 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 3.3.3
ok, I see: it will be tricky to reproduce...
I fear I won't be able to publish to "Reproducible Central" https://github.com/jvm-repo-rebuild/reproducible-central
for future releases, I think we should avoid such toolchain usage
It means that before doing a release, checking if javadoc can be built should also be done, to avoid discovering issues during the release
Regards,
Hervé
Le vendredi 31 juillet 2020, 08:42:26 CEST Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
> Thanks Hervé,
>
> The build was done using AdoptOpenJdk 8 update 242, but using toolchains.
> Failed Javadoc was one of the reasons for using toolchains, there were just
> soo many errors. The toolchain itself used Java 7 update 79 from Oracle, so
> the bytecode should be different if you don't use toolchains.
>
> You can see more details about my build process and problems in this JIRA
> issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-419
>
> --
> Dennis Lundberg
>
> Den tors 30 juli 2020 kl 22:36 skrev Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr>:
> > +1
> >
> > trying to check reproducible builds, found that reference build was done
> > with
> > JDK 8 on Windows
> > But I got 2 issues to reproduce:
> > 1. javadoc fails with JDK 8
> > 2. your bytecode is different from mine
> >
> > what detailed distribution of JDK did you use, please? Mine is
> > AdoptOpenJDK
> > 1.8.0_202
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hervé
> >
> > Le vendredi 24 juillet 2020, 16:08:10 CEST Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We solved 12
> >
> > > issues:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12342
> >
> > 756&styleName=Text&projectId=12317922&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4
> > JA>
> > > -FDED_7bf996098e890abc72bf3628a70b9090574f431d_lin
> > >
> > > There are still a couple of issues left in
> >
> > > JIRA:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MSHARED%20AN
> >
> > D%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20%3D%20maven-shared-u
> > ti>
> > > ls%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
> > >
> > > Staging
> >
> > > repo:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1598/https://
> >
> > repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/maven-1598/content/org/ap
> > ac
> >
> > he/maven/shared/maven-shared-utils/3.3.3/maven-shared-utils-3.3.3-source-r
> > el>
> > > ease.zip
> > >
> > > Source release checksum(s):
> >
> > > maven-shared-utils-3.3.3-source-release.zip sha512:
> > 6085d3bb3d065efaca7ed43f7342c2b71c624235ff38cd1410a06a4c915e39a13cb00e65e8
> > c0>
> > > cd7203dc5b2d1deeb392eaab2aa0a43bfadb7c9d4286a2b473bc
> > >
> > > Staging
> >
> > > site:
> > https://maven.apache.org/components/shared-archives/maven-shared-utils
> >
> > > -LATEST/
> > >
> > > Guide to testing staged
> >
> > > releases:
> > https://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.
> >
> > > html
> > >
> > > Vote open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1
> > >
> > > As some of you might have noticed we ended up with version 3.3.3 instead
> >
> > of
> >
> > > the planned 3.3.1. I had some issues with the release process and burned
> >
> > 2
> >
> > > releases. I will address that in a JIRA issue shortly. Please let me
> > > know
> > > if I have missed anything.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Dennis Lundberg
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 3.3.3
Posted by Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Thanks for the link Hervé. That is an interesting initiative, I was not
aware of it.
Please write down your opinion on toolchains in the JIRA issue I created,
to establish new and updated instructions for our release build process
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-419
I'd like for us to decide whether it is OK to build components, that
require Java 7, using Java 8 during a release or not.
There is already a step in our release instructions that covers checking
Javadoc. You should build the site with reporting turned on. That's what I
did and that's when I realized that the Javadoc for the components was not
compatible with Java 8. So it was detected before I cut the release. This
and the fact that the component requires Java 7 made me decide to use
toolchains for the build.
--
Dennis Lundberg
Den lör 1 aug. 2020 kl 08:28 skrev Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr>:
> ok, I see: it will be tricky to reproduce...
> I fear I won't be able to publish to "Reproducible Central"
> https://github.com/jvm-repo-rebuild/reproducible-central
>
> for future releases, I think we should avoid such toolchain usage
> It means that before doing a release, checking if javadoc can be built
> should also be done, to avoid discovering issues during the release
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le vendredi 31 juillet 2020, 08:42:26 CEST Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
> > Thanks Hervé,
> >
> > The build was done using AdoptOpenJdk 8 update 242, but using toolchains.
> > Failed Javadoc was one of the reasons for using toolchains, there were
> just
> > soo many errors. The toolchain itself used Java 7 update 79 from Oracle,
> so
> > the bytecode should be different if you don't use toolchains.
> >
> > You can see more details about my build process and problems in this JIRA
> > issue:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-419
> >
> > --
> > Dennis Lundberg
> >
> > Den tors 30 juli 2020 kl 22:36 skrev Hervé BOUTEMY <
> herve.boutemy@free.fr>:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > trying to check reproducible builds, found that reference build was
> done
> > > with
> > > JDK 8 on Windows
> > > But I got 2 issues to reproduce:
> > > 1. javadoc fails with JDK 8
> > > 2. your bytecode is different from mine
> > >
> > > what detailed distribution of JDK did you use, please? Mine is
> > > AdoptOpenJDK
> > > 1.8.0_202
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Hervé
> > >
> > > Le vendredi 24 juillet 2020, 16:08:10 CEST Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > We solved 12
> > >
> > > > issues:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12342
> > >
> > >
> 756&styleName=Text&projectId=12317922&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4
> > > JA>
> > > > -FDED_7bf996098e890abc72bf3628a70b9090574f431d_lin
> > > >
> > > > There are still a couple of issues left in
> > >
> > > > JIRA:
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MSHARED%20AN
> > >
> > >
> D%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20%3D%20maven-shared-u
> > > ti>
> > > > ls%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
> > > >
> > > > Staging
> > >
> > > > repo:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1598/https://
> > >
> > >
> repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/maven-1598/content/org/ap
> > > ac
> > >
> > >
> he/maven/shared/maven-shared-utils/3.3.3/maven-shared-utils-3.3.3-source-r
> > > el>
> > > > ease.zip
> > > >
> > > > Source release checksum(s):
> > >
> > > > maven-shared-utils-3.3.3-source-release.zip sha512:
> > >
> 6085d3bb3d065efaca7ed43f7342c2b71c624235ff38cd1410a06a4c915e39a13cb00e65e8
> > > c0>
> > > > cd7203dc5b2d1deeb392eaab2aa0a43bfadb7c9d4286a2b473bc
> > > >
> > > > Staging
> > >
> > > > site:
> > > https://maven.apache.org/components/shared-archives/maven-shared-utils
> > >
> > > > -LATEST/
> > > >
> > > > Guide to testing staged
> > >
> > > > releases:
> > > https://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.
> > >
> > > > html
> > > >
> > > > Vote open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1
> > > > [ ] +0
> > > > [ ] -1
> > > >
> > > > As some of you might have noticed we ended up with version 3.3.3
> instead
> > >
> > > of
> > >
> > > > the planned 3.3.1. I had some issues with the release process and
> burned
> > >
> > > 2
> > >
> > > > releases. I will address that in a JIRA issue shortly. Please let me
> > > > know
> > > > if I have missed anything.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Dennis Lundberg
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>