You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com> on 2006/02/21 21:43:33 UTC
PPMC for Yoko
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
All incubator podlings need to have a PPMC -- podling PMC.
AFAICS, Yoko does not yet have one sorted out. So.. who
should be on it? The podling mentors, of course, but
whom else? All of the podling [initial] committers?
- --
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBQ/t7dZrNPMCpn3XdAQLFWwQAvycmFE2ZKDHkqYWohnt58NhxVqEVk96N
v8nnqnY8JNvTDTD1vZmup5nezeECNl9mn/dcXQG/vGKbat9dCJWVOlcAo8uTDWlN
hmVTtdzhNrOvzCFGpr8ba8yMj7iMLNd0cH57ek+cSizhn+ehg26m4nBNcjgxcGaI
1hsD3ZqlVMw=
=Cx4H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: PPMC for Yoko
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> So, subprojects should have PMCs?
No, there is one PMC per TLP. Podlings aren't TLPs and they
aren't subprojects. They're their own discrete entities, with
steering groups lasting as long as their podling status does.
- --
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBQ/vFq5rNPMCpn3XdAQIzcAP+OYlcCqwPC3h49+WJueFcVUAuBZkYbqSe
JE7hhc6eZqXfWNYGzsZtU6o0wx7uxZPXxInRePMu1JNTimbsSRNQoOtfKt4XMEl1
N4rXq7eHJXwmG8fzfPXGAdqf5esUBaxFstrzy5sMkHbgOc8GktrJImHNOSFs+O+q
CeDgvEmJy6o=
=m9wi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: PPMC for Yoko
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On 2/21/2006 2:54 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>
>>Works for me. I don't remember ServiceMix and ActiveMQ having a podling
>>PMC. How is Yoko different?
>>
>>
>
>It's not; it's ActiveMQ and ServiceMix that are different.
>They should have PPMCs themselves. Their mentors should
>see to it. :-)
>
>
So, subprojects should have PMCs?
Regards,
Alan
Re: PPMC for Yoko
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com>.
On 2/22/06, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:
> So when they graduate as subprojects of geronimo, how does that
> workout? Does the PPMC just get dissolved?
>
s/when/if/
(both in sense of success and destination :)
I'd assume they all get added (or at least voted for) on the Geronimo PMC.
- Brett
Re: PPMC for Yoko
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Blevins wrote:
>
> So when they graduate as subprojects of geronimo, how does that
> workout? Does the PPMC just get dissolved?
It's handled on a case by case basis. If it's graduating
to a TLP, the PPMC typically becomes the PMC of the new
project. If it's joining and existing TLP, what happens
is up to the TLP and the podling. Derby's PPMC, for
instance, got largely merged into the DB project's PMC.
But not 100% as I recall.
- --
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBQ/vEyprNPMCpn3XdAQLcpAQA2uKHNSNM6+WbT1nP3v/AH1Ri8s1ehgsD
uvKhDmG3Ow6j2njGEe4nUKfXu6U0KhBzOqfZPh6b1yTH9mEhKnIoxxobC8/wCVSK
yREHu2x1DChjuRC9EnaIP9jSJYw/1nw+IANmw3Y4+UgnRa7VsafFvgW6b9ZgHFIn
NhxiW/LTu0c=
=bx4L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: PPMC for Yoko
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Feb 21, 2006, at 2:54 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>> Works for me. I don't remember ServiceMix and ActiveMQ having a
>> podling
>> PMC. How is Yoko different?
>
> It's not; it's ActiveMQ and ServiceMix that are different.
> They should have PPMCs themselves. Their mentors should
> see to it. :-)
So when they graduate as subprojects of geronimo, how does that
workout? Does the PPMC just get dissolved?
-David
Re: PPMC for Yoko
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> Works for me. I don't remember ServiceMix and ActiveMQ having a podling
> PMC. How is Yoko different?
It's not; it's ActiveMQ and ServiceMix that are different.
They should have PPMCs themselves. Their mentors should
see to it. :-)
- --
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBQ/uaL5rNPMCpn3XdAQI/+gQAtQjpZk4UXdNvr+glHZt7UCdUzIYM9Wwc
m+wNgXoyi5HIBy1lw7HVCzxO1apqGJ4NDbycZnt6etW/cMsGNA3nYGRGzmqJXHkS
6ymQHzf10rRAoWu/R+c6Ll5HD8YkG41Vegg06gZmmOMRau7yVOY7sAfQTqWHiefH
oMvyp85yPP0=
=4hgG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: PPMC for Yoko
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On 2/21/2006 12:43 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>All incubator podlings need to have a PPMC -- podling PMC.
>AFAICS, Yoko does not yet have one sorted out. So.. who
>should be on it? The podling mentors, of course, but
>whom else? All of the podling [initial] committers?
>
>
Works for me. I don't remember ServiceMix and ActiveMQ having a podling
PMC. How is Yoko different?
Regards,
Alan