You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Apache Software Foundation <hu...@Apache.Org> on 2002/05/10 16:57:54 UTC
Re: 2.0.36
Not acked. Please Cc me when responding.
----- Forwarded message from Marc Pitoniak <ma...@worldnet.att.net> -----
From: "Marc Pitoniak" <ma...@worldnet.att.net>
To: <hu...@Apache.Org>
Subject: 2.0.36
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 14:42:14 -0500
Importance: Normal
Are you planning on providing a Win-32 no source-precompiled installation
for version 2.0.36?
Thank you very much.
Marc Pitoniak
----- End forwarded message -----
--
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
Re: 2.0.36
Posted by Jerry Baker <je...@weirdness.com>.
Jerry Baker wrote:
>
> There is no "-no_src" version there that I can see. Just
> apache_2.0.36-win32-x86-no_ssl.msi.
>
> --
> Jerry Baker
It took me reading that a few times to realize that it was only
applicable to the 1.3.X releases. I'm not sure how to make it more clear
though.
--
Jerry Baker
Re: 2.0.36
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
At 10:50 AM 5/10/2002, you wrote:
>"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
> >
> > Not acked. Would anyone care to reread the notes at /dist/httpd/ and
> > /dist/httpd/binaries/win32/ and see if they can figure out how someone
> > fails to get from 'here' to 'there'? As I just revised 'em, apparently my
> > reasoning was incomplete. Another set of eyes would be great.
>
>Well, http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/ says:
>
>"The two -no_src versions, both the .exe and .msi installers DO NOT
>contain the source code. There is no other difference, and if you do not
>know the C language, or have no C compiler installed, these versions are
>faster to download. There is no other difference between these packages
>and the -src .msi version."
>
>There is no "-no_src" version there that I can see. Just
>apache_2.0.36-win32-x86-no_ssl.msi.
ahhh. Now I see confusion. You would be reading the 1.3 section. If you
follow to the 2.0 section, I believe I spelled out that we don't know how we
want to blend the source tree into a distro, so the 2.0 section spells out
where to find the sources.
For starters, it's probably time to reverse the 1.3 and 2.0 sections. And
spell out apache_1.3.x-win32-x86-no_src.msi so it's not so ambigious.
I'll get to those over the weekend.
Re: 2.0.36
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
At 10:50 AM 5/10/2002, you wrote:
>"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
> >
> > Not acked. Would anyone care to reread the notes at /dist/httpd/ and
> > /dist/httpd/binaries/win32/ and see if they can figure out how someone
> > fails to get from 'here' to 'there'? As I just revised 'em, apparently my
> > reasoning was incomplete. Another set of eyes would be great.
>
>Well, http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/ says:
>
>"The two -no_src versions, both the .exe and .msi installers DO NOT
>contain the source code. There is no other difference, and if you do not
>know the C language, or have no C compiler installed, these versions are
>faster to download. There is no other difference between these packages
>and the -src .msi version."
>
>There is no "-no_src" version there that I can see. Just
>apache_2.0.36-win32-x86-no_ssl.msi.
ahhh. Now I see confusion. You would be reading the 1.3 section. If you
follow to the 2.0 section, I believe I spelled out that we don't know how we
want to blend the source tree into a distro, so the 2.0 section spells out
where to find the sources.
For starters, it's probably time to reverse the 1.3 and 2.0 sections. And
spell out apache_1.3.x-win32-x86-no_src.msi so it's not so ambigious.
I'll get to those over the weekend.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: 2.0.36
Posted by Jerry Baker <je...@weirdness.com>.
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
>
> Not acked. Would anyone care to reread the notes at /dist/httpd/ and
> /dist/httpd/binaries/win32/ and see if they can figure out how someone
> fails to get from 'here' to 'there'? As I just revised 'em, apparently my
> reasoning was incomplete. Another set of eyes would be great.
Well, http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/ says:
"The two -no_src versions, both the .exe and .msi installers DO NOT
contain the source code. There is no other difference, and if you do not
know the C language, or have no C compiler installed, these versions are
faster to download. There is no other difference between these packages
and the -src .msi version."
There is no "-no_src" version there that I can see. Just
apache_2.0.36-win32-x86-no_ssl.msi.
--
Jerry Baker
Re: 2.0.36
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Not acked. Would anyone care to reread the notes at /dist/httpd/ and
/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/ and see if they can figure out how someone
fails to get from 'here' to 'there'? As I just revised 'em, apparently my
reasoning was incomplete. Another set of eyes would be great.
At 09:57 AM 5/10/2002, Ken Coar writes:
>Not acked. Please Cc me when responding.
>
>----- Forwarded message from Marc Pitoniak <ma...@worldnet.att.net>
>-----
>
>From: "Marc Pitoniak" <ma...@worldnet.att.net>
>To: <hu...@Apache.Org>
>Subject: 2.0.36
>Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 14:42:14 -0500
>Importance: Normal
>
>Are you planning on providing a Win-32 no source-precompiled installation
>for version 2.0.36?
>
>Thank you very much.
>
>Marc Pitoniak
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: 2.0.36
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Not acked. Would anyone care to reread the notes at /dist/httpd/ and
/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/ and see if they can figure out how someone
fails to get from 'here' to 'there'? As I just revised 'em, apparently my
reasoning was incomplete. Another set of eyes would be great.
At 09:57 AM 5/10/2002, Ken Coar writes:
>Not acked. Please Cc me when responding.
>
>----- Forwarded message from Marc Pitoniak <ma...@worldnet.att.net>
>-----
>
>From: "Marc Pitoniak" <ma...@worldnet.att.net>
>To: <hu...@Apache.Org>
>Subject: 2.0.36
>Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 14:42:14 -0500
>Importance: Normal
>
>Are you planning on providing a Win-32 no source-precompiled installation
>for version 2.0.36?
>
>Thank you very much.
>
>Marc Pitoniak