You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cloudstack.apache.org by Alessandro Caviglione <c....@gmail.com> on 2019/10/19 19:50:19 UTC
Secondary storage issue on CS 4.13
Hi,
I've just deployed a new CS 4.13 management server and I've configured the
zone for VMware in this way:
Management network vSwitch0 VLAN200 (SystemVM IPs 192.168.200.170-200)
Public Network vSwitch1 VLAN201 (Some Public IPs)
Guest Network vSwith1 VLAN 400-500
I do not have configured Storage Network because I know that if it's not
configured, Management Network is used.
In fact, Secondary Storage is in the same network as Management Network and
it has IP: 192.168.200.20
I've correctly configured Secondary Storage to use NFS share over
192.168.200.20 storage.
Secondary Storage VM has been deployed and it's running, but I see that it
has 2 IPs, one on Management and one on Public Network.
As far as I know, it should have one additional IP for Link Local...
However, my issue is that when I try to add an ISO Template, nothing is
downloaded and in management-server log I see:
"There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage host CS-SEC-VMW"
what it means?
Thank you!!
Re: Secondary storage issue on CS 4.13
Posted by Andrija Panic <an...@gmail.com>.
"host" setting is what is propagated to agents once they are connected -
check if that was for some reason set to "localhost".
Glad you solved the problem!
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, 10:22 Alessandro Caviglione, <c....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello Andija,
> thank you very much for your effort and explanations :)
> Actually we're in advanced zone but I saw in SSVM cloud.log that it's
> trying to connect lo localhost:8250 so I understood that SSVM was trying to
> connect to Management Server that, obviously, is not localhost.
> It's still not clear for me how Management Server can push his hostname if
> the SSVM is unable to connect to Management Server, but I changed some
> settings in ACS (please, tell me which one is the right one), recreate SSVM
> and CPVM and all works fine! :)
>
> Thank you
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 11:55 PM Andrija Panic <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > HI Alessandro,
> >
> > in case of VMware, link local network is not (possible to be) used - so
> > the mgmt IP is actually used - i.e. mgmt server will talk mgmt IP inside
> > the SSVM (over ssh), so that is clear I guess.
> > Have you preseeded the systemVM template as the manual instructs? Once
> you
> > have systemVM template in place and at least one alive hypervisor host,
> ACS
> > will try to create a SSVM and CPVM from that template.
> > You can check their state in INfrastructure --> System VMs, their state
> > should be UP and Agent State should be Connected (both green) - if that
> is
> > in place, you are good to go to download any template/ISO.
> >
> > Are you using Basic zone or Advanced? I remember a bug in Basic zones,
> that
> > ssvm will try to mount Secondary NFS server by routing via it's Public
> > (default) interface, so in this case, even if SS is in same
> subnet/network
> > as the mgmt network, it's still advisable to explicitly define Storage
> > network, using same subnet, and also reserve a small chunk of the network
> > to be assinged to systemVMs etc. - so that another interface/NIC will be
> > created inside SSVM in that storage network (so your mgmt network again)
> > and then all will be OK.
> >
> > Let me know about systemVM template ^^^
> >
> > Andrija
> >
> > On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 21:50, Alessandro Caviglione <
> > c.alessandro@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I've just deployed a new CS 4.13 management server and I've configured
> > the
> > > zone for VMware in this way:
> > >
> > > Management network vSwitch0 VLAN200 (SystemVM IPs 192.168.200.170-200)
> > > Public Network vSwitch1 VLAN201 (Some Public IPs)
> > > Guest Network vSwith1 VLAN 400-500
> > >
> > > I do not have configured Storage Network because I know that if it's
> not
> > > configured, Management Network is used.
> > > In fact, Secondary Storage is in the same network as Management Network
> > and
> > > it has IP: 192.168.200.20
> > >
> > > I've correctly configured Secondary Storage to use NFS share over
> > > 192.168.200.20 storage.
> > > Secondary Storage VM has been deployed and it's running, but I see that
> > it
> > > has 2 IPs, one on Management and one on Public Network.
> > > As far as I know, it should have one additional IP for Link Local...
> > > However, my issue is that when I try to add an ISO Template, nothing is
> > > downloaded and in management-server log I see:
> > > "There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage host
> CS-SEC-VMW"
> > >
> > > what it means?
> > >
> > > Thank you!!
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Andrija Panić
> >
>
Re: Secondary storage issue on CS 4.13
Posted by Alessandro Caviglione <c....@gmail.com>.
Hello Andija,
thank you very much for your effort and explanations :)
Actually we're in advanced zone but I saw in SSVM cloud.log that it's
trying to connect lo localhost:8250 so I understood that SSVM was trying to
connect to Management Server that, obviously, is not localhost.
It's still not clear for me how Management Server can push his hostname if
the SSVM is unable to connect to Management Server, but I changed some
settings in ACS (please, tell me which one is the right one), recreate SSVM
and CPVM and all works fine! :)
Thank you
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 11:55 PM Andrija Panic <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> HI Alessandro,
>
> in case of VMware, link local network is not (possible to be) used - so
> the mgmt IP is actually used - i.e. mgmt server will talk mgmt IP inside
> the SSVM (over ssh), so that is clear I guess.
> Have you preseeded the systemVM template as the manual instructs? Once you
> have systemVM template in place and at least one alive hypervisor host, ACS
> will try to create a SSVM and CPVM from that template.
> You can check their state in INfrastructure --> System VMs, their state
> should be UP and Agent State should be Connected (both green) - if that is
> in place, you are good to go to download any template/ISO.
>
> Are you using Basic zone or Advanced? I remember a bug in Basic zones, that
> ssvm will try to mount Secondary NFS server by routing via it's Public
> (default) interface, so in this case, even if SS is in same subnet/network
> as the mgmt network, it's still advisable to explicitly define Storage
> network, using same subnet, and also reserve a small chunk of the network
> to be assinged to systemVMs etc. - so that another interface/NIC will be
> created inside SSVM in that storage network (so your mgmt network again)
> and then all will be OK.
>
> Let me know about systemVM template ^^^
>
> Andrija
>
> On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 21:50, Alessandro Caviglione <
> c.alessandro@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I've just deployed a new CS 4.13 management server and I've configured
> the
> > zone for VMware in this way:
> >
> > Management network vSwitch0 VLAN200 (SystemVM IPs 192.168.200.170-200)
> > Public Network vSwitch1 VLAN201 (Some Public IPs)
> > Guest Network vSwith1 VLAN 400-500
> >
> > I do not have configured Storage Network because I know that if it's not
> > configured, Management Network is used.
> > In fact, Secondary Storage is in the same network as Management Network
> and
> > it has IP: 192.168.200.20
> >
> > I've correctly configured Secondary Storage to use NFS share over
> > 192.168.200.20 storage.
> > Secondary Storage VM has been deployed and it's running, but I see that
> it
> > has 2 IPs, one on Management and one on Public Network.
> > As far as I know, it should have one additional IP for Link Local...
> > However, my issue is that when I try to add an ISO Template, nothing is
> > downloaded and in management-server log I see:
> > "There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage host CS-SEC-VMW"
> >
> > what it means?
> >
> > Thank you!!
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
>
Re: Secondary storage issue on CS 4.13
Posted by Andrija Panic <an...@gmail.com>.
HI Alessandro,
in case of VMware, link local network is not (possible to be) used - so
the mgmt IP is actually used - i.e. mgmt server will talk mgmt IP inside
the SSVM (over ssh), so that is clear I guess.
Have you preseeded the systemVM template as the manual instructs? Once you
have systemVM template in place and at least one alive hypervisor host, ACS
will try to create a SSVM and CPVM from that template.
You can check their state in INfrastructure --> System VMs, their state
should be UP and Agent State should be Connected (both green) - if that is
in place, you are good to go to download any template/ISO.
Are you using Basic zone or Advanced? I remember a bug in Basic zones, that
ssvm will try to mount Secondary NFS server by routing via it's Public
(default) interface, so in this case, even if SS is in same subnet/network
as the mgmt network, it's still advisable to explicitly define Storage
network, using same subnet, and also reserve a small chunk of the network
to be assinged to systemVMs etc. - so that another interface/NIC will be
created inside SSVM in that storage network (so your mgmt network again)
and then all will be OK.
Let me know about systemVM template ^^^
Andrija
On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 21:50, Alessandro Caviglione <c....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
> I've just deployed a new CS 4.13 management server and I've configured the
> zone for VMware in this way:
>
> Management network vSwitch0 VLAN200 (SystemVM IPs 192.168.200.170-200)
> Public Network vSwitch1 VLAN201 (Some Public IPs)
> Guest Network vSwith1 VLAN 400-500
>
> I do not have configured Storage Network because I know that if it's not
> configured, Management Network is used.
> In fact, Secondary Storage is in the same network as Management Network and
> it has IP: 192.168.200.20
>
> I've correctly configured Secondary Storage to use NFS share over
> 192.168.200.20 storage.
> Secondary Storage VM has been deployed and it's running, but I see that it
> has 2 IPs, one on Management and one on Public Network.
> As far as I know, it should have one additional IP for Link Local...
> However, my issue is that when I try to add an ISO Template, nothing is
> downloaded and in management-server log I see:
> "There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage host CS-SEC-VMW"
>
> what it means?
>
> Thank you!!
>
--
Andrija Panić