You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pig.apache.org by "Olga Natkovich (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/05/02 18:38:55 UTC

[jira] Created: (PIG-228) names for secondary streaming outputs don't match the spec

names for secondary streaming outputs don't match the spec
----------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: PIG-228
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-228
             Project: Pig
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Olga Natkovich
         Attachments: secondary_outputs.patch

we currently prepend the task id to the name which can be confusing to the users especially in the presenese of multiple outputs.

the proposal is to create a directory that matches the output name and have part files within that (similarly to how we treat regular outputs.)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Resolved: (PIG-228) names for secondary streaming outputs don't match the spec

Posted by "Olga Natkovich (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Olga Natkovich resolved PIG-228.
--------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

patch committed, thanks arun.

> names for secondary streaming outputs don't match the spec
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-228
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-228
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Olga Natkovich
>            Assignee: Arun C Murthy
>         Attachments: PIG-228_1_20080502.patch, secondary_outputs.patch
>
>
> we currently prepend the task id to the name which can be confusing to the users especially in the presenese of multiple outputs.
> the proposal is to create a directory that matches the output name and have part files within that (similarly to how we treat regular outputs.)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Commented: (PIG-228) names for secondary streaming outputs don't match the spec

Posted by "Olga Natkovich (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12593869#action_12593869 ] 

Olga Natkovich commented on PIG-228:
------------------------------------

second patch also committed

> names for secondary streaming outputs don't match the spec
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-228
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-228
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Olga Natkovich
>            Assignee: Arun C Murthy
>         Attachments: PIG-228_1_20080502.patch, secondary_outputs.patch
>
>
> we currently prepend the task id to the name which can be confusing to the users especially in the presenese of multiple outputs.
> the proposal is to create a directory that matches the output name and have part files within that (similarly to how we treat regular outputs.)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Updated: (PIG-228) names for secondary streaming outputs don't match the spec

Posted by "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Arun C Murthy updated PIG-228:
------------------------------

    Attachment: PIG-228_1_20080502.patch

Patch to fix the secondary outputs.

> names for secondary streaming outputs don't match the spec
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-228
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-228
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Olga Natkovich
>            Assignee: Arun C Murthy
>         Attachments: PIG-228_1_20080502.patch, secondary_outputs.patch
>
>
> we currently prepend the task id to the name which can be confusing to the users especially in the presenese of multiple outputs.
> the proposal is to create a directory that matches the output name and have part files within that (similarly to how we treat regular outputs.)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Assigned: (PIG-228) names for secondary streaming outputs don't match the spec

Posted by "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Arun C Murthy reassigned PIG-228:
---------------------------------

    Assignee: Arun C Murthy

> names for secondary streaming outputs don't match the spec
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-228
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-228
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Olga Natkovich
>            Assignee: Arun C Murthy
>         Attachments: secondary_outputs.patch
>
>
> we currently prepend the task id to the name which can be confusing to the users especially in the presenese of multiple outputs.
> the proposal is to create a directory that matches the output name and have part files within that (similarly to how we treat regular outputs.)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Updated: (PIG-228) names for secondary streaming outputs don't match the spec

Posted by "Olga Natkovich (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Olga Natkovich updated PIG-228:
-------------------------------

    Attachment: secondary_outputs.patch

Patch supplied by arun

> names for secondary streaming outputs don't match the spec
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-228
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-228
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Olga Natkovich
>         Attachments: secondary_outputs.patch
>
>
> we currently prepend the task id to the name which can be confusing to the users especially in the presenese of multiple outputs.
> the proposal is to create a directory that matches the output name and have part files within that (similarly to how we treat regular outputs.)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Commented: (PIG-228) names for secondary streaming outputs don't match the spec

Posted by "Olga Natkovich (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12593817#action_12593817 ] 

Olga Natkovich commented on PIG-228:
------------------------------------

verified the patch. will commit once svn is back

> names for secondary streaming outputs don't match the spec
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-228
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-228
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Olga Natkovich
>         Attachments: secondary_outputs.patch
>
>
> we currently prepend the task id to the name which can be confusing to the users especially in the presenese of multiple outputs.
> the proposal is to create a directory that matches the output name and have part files within that (similarly to how we treat regular outputs.)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.