You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Fuhwei Lwo <fu...@bricemedia.com> on 2006/12/04 15:15:58 UTC
Java SDO Question: Native support for "commonj.sdo/xml" data model
I found the current Java SDO runtime has natively registered and supported "commonj.sdo" and "commonj.sdo/java" data model but I didn't see "commonj.sdo/xml" was registered and supported. Shouldn't "commonj.sdo/xml" be part of SDO's core model?
Thanks in advance.
Re: Java SDO Question: Native support for "commonj.sdo/xml" data model
Posted by Frank Budinsky <fr...@ca.ibm.com>.
Fuhwei,
I agree we need to add support for the xmlElement global property.
Actually, Yang has volunteered to do it soon.
Go ahead and open the JIRA.
Thanks,
Frank.
Fuhwei Lwo <fu...@bricemedia.com> wrote on 12/04/2006 08:24:35 PM:
> Frank,
>
> Do you mind my opening a JIRA to track this requirement? I think
> the users may need "commonj.sdo/xml" namespace for defining SDO
> types programmatically to control the format of XML serialization.
>
> Fuhwei
>
> Frank Budinsky <fr...@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Fuhwei, you are right that we should preregister commonj.sdo/xml.
We
> haven't really needed it for anything before now ... that's the only
> reason we don't have it already.
>
> Frank.
>
> Fuhwei Lwo wrote on 12/04/2006 09:15:58 AM:
>
> > I found the current Java SDO runtime has natively registered and
> > supported "commonj.sdo" and "commonj.sdo/java" data model but I
> > didn't see "commonj.sdo/xml" was registered and supported.
> > Shouldn't "commonj.sdo/xml" be part of SDO's core model?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Java SDO Question: Native support for "commonj.sdo/xml" data model
Posted by Fuhwei Lwo <fu...@bricemedia.com>.
Frank,
Do you mind my opening a JIRA to track this requirement? I think the users may need "commonj.sdo/xml" namespace for defining SDO types programmatically to control the format of XML serialization.
Fuhwei
Frank Budinsky <fr...@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
Hi Fuhwei, you are right that we should preregister commonj.sdo/xml. We
haven't really needed it for anything before now ... that's the only
reason we don't have it already.
Frank.
Fuhwei Lwo wrote on 12/04/2006 09:15:58 AM:
> I found the current Java SDO runtime has natively registered and
> supported "commonj.sdo" and "commonj.sdo/java" data model but I
> didn't see "commonj.sdo/xml" was registered and supported.
> Shouldn't "commonj.sdo/xml" be part of SDO's core model?
>
> Thanks in advance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Java SDO Question: Native support for "commonj.sdo/xml" data model
Posted by Frank Budinsky <fr...@ca.ibm.com>.
Hi Fuhwei, you are right that we should preregister commonj.sdo/xml. We
haven't really needed it for anything before now ... that's the only
reason we don't have it already.
Frank.
Fuhwei Lwo <fu...@bricemedia.com> wrote on 12/04/2006 09:15:58 AM:
> I found the current Java SDO runtime has natively registered and
> supported "commonj.sdo" and "commonj.sdo/java" data model but I
> didn't see "commonj.sdo/xml" was registered and supported.
> Shouldn't "commonj.sdo/xml" be part of SDO's core model?
>
> Thanks in advance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org