You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Hudson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/09/10 01:48:55 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5548) Add ability to get a table in the
shell
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13762474#comment-13762474 ]
Hudson commented on HBASE-5548:
-------------------------------
FAILURE: Integrated in hbase-0.96 #26 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.96/26/])
HBASE-9449 document how to use shell enhancements from HBASE-5548 (jmhsieh: rev 1521287)
* /hbase/branches/0.96/src/main/docbkx/shell.xml
> Add ability to get a table in the shell
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5548
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5548
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: shell
> Reporter: Jesse Yates
> Assignee: Jesse Yates
> Fix For: 0.95.0
>
> Attachments: ruby_HBASE-5528-v0.patch, ruby_HBASE-5548-addendum.patch, ruby_HBASE-5548-v1.patch, ruby_HBASE-5548-v2.patch, ruby_HBASE-5548-v3.patch, ruby_HBASE-5548-v5.patch
>
>
> Currently, all the commands that operate on a table in the shell first have to take the table as name as input.
> There are two main considerations:
> * It is annoying to have to write the table name every time, when you should just be able to get a reference to a table
> * the current implementation is very wasteful - it creates a new HTable for each call (but reuses the connection since it uses the same configuration)
> We should be able to get a handle to a single HTable and then operate on that.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira