You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@kafka.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/06/21 02:14:34 UTC

[GitHub] [kafka] C0urante commented on a diff in pull request #12309: KAFKA-14007: Invoking connect headers.close method on shutdown

C0urante commented on code in PR #12309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12309#discussion_r902098848


##########
connect/api/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/connect/storage/StringConverter.java:
##########
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ public SchemaAndValue toConnectHeader(String topic, String headerKey, byte[] val
 
     @Override
     public void close() {
-        // do nothing
+        this.serializer.close();
+        this.deserializer.close();

Review Comment:
   Good catch here. Should we do the same in the [NumberConverter](https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/30216ea1c58761e62f51af40033f24e3ae1c5c2a/connect/runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/connect/converters/NumberConverter.java#L123-L125) class?



##########
connect/api/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/connect/storage/StringConverter.java:
##########
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ public SchemaAndValue toConnectHeader(String topic, String headerKey, byte[] val
 
     @Override
     public void close() {
-        // do nothing
+        this.serializer.close();
+        this.deserializer.close();

Review Comment:
   Also, even though these are no-ops right now, if we want to be meticulous about the cleanup logic here, should we wrap both of these in `Utils::closeQuietly`, so that if one fails, we still get a chance to close the other?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscribe@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org