You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/03/31 17:54:25 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-7150) geo3d public APIs should match the 2D apis?

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-7150.
----------------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 6.1
                   master

Thanks [~daddywri]!

> geo3d public APIs should match the 2D apis?
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7150
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7150
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: master, 6.1
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-7150-sphere.patch, LUCENE-7150.patch, LUCENE-7150.patch, LUCENE-7150.patch, LUCENE-7150.patch, LUCENE-7150.patch, LUCENE-7150.patch
>
>
> I'm struggling to benchmark the equivalent to {{LatLonPoint.newDistanceQuery}} in the geo3d world.
> Ideally, I think we'd have a {{Geo3DPoint.newDistanceQuery}}?  And it would take degrees, not radians, and radiusMeters, not an angle?
> And if I index and search using {{PlanetModel.SPHERE}} I think it should ideally give the same results as {{LatLonPoint.newDistanceQuery}}, which uses haversin.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org