You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to mime4j-dev@james.apache.org by "Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)" <mi...@james.apache.org> on 2010/02/02 14:34:19 UTC
[jira] Updated: (MIME4J-157) Reorganize code/packages/classes in
order to better self-document mime4j architecture and be able to split it
into modules
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Stefano Bagnara updated MIME4J-157:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: graph-mime4j-packages-20100202.png
graph-mime4j-parserdetail-20100202.png
Here are 2 graphs for the current packages to better understand their dependencies
> Reorganize code/packages/classes in order to better self-document mime4j architecture and be able to split it into modules
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MIME4J-157
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-157
> Project: JAMES Mime4j
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.6
> Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
> Assignee: Stefano Bagnara
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.7
>
> Attachments: graph-mime4j-cycleclean-2010-01-03.png, graph-mime4j-cycleclean-20100102.png, graph-mime4j-packages-20100202.png, graph-mime4j-parserdetail-20100202.png
>
>
> We should start reorganizing code into better packages, then we can decide how/if to split mime4j in different modules.
> Work cycleclean branch (mainly related to MIME4J-156) already improved separation of concerns, but we can do much more, starting from the parser package.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.