You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to mime4j-dev@james.apache.org by "Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)" <mi...@james.apache.org> on 2010/02/02 14:34:19 UTC

[jira] Updated: (MIME4J-157) Reorganize code/packages/classes in order to better self-document mime4j architecture and be able to split it into modules

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Stefano Bagnara updated MIME4J-157:
-----------------------------------

    Attachment: graph-mime4j-packages-20100202.png
                graph-mime4j-parserdetail-20100202.png

Here are 2 graphs for the current packages to better understand their dependencies

> Reorganize code/packages/classes in order to better self-document mime4j architecture and be able to split it into modules
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MIME4J-157
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-157
>             Project: JAMES Mime4j
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.6
>            Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
>            Assignee: Stefano Bagnara
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.7
>
>         Attachments: graph-mime4j-cycleclean-2010-01-03.png, graph-mime4j-cycleclean-20100102.png, graph-mime4j-packages-20100202.png, graph-mime4j-parserdetail-20100202.png
>
>
> We should start reorganizing code into better packages, then we can decide how/if to split mime4j in different modules.
> Work cycleclean branch (mainly related to MIME4J-156) already improved  separation of concerns, but we can do much more, starting from the parser package. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.