You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by "Patrick Hunt (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/06/23 19:23:47 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1107) automating log and snapshot
cleaning
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053986#comment-13053986 ]
Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1107:
-----------------------------------------
Can you give some rational for this change? Is PTL not sufficient?
Also see this JIRA, which would make such changes obsolete: ZOOKEEPER-323
here are some reasons I can remember we do it this way:
1) keep things simple, eg cron job with a basic script that could do whatever it likes re cleanup - thereby conforming to whatever requirements the operator might have (which will typ be very different from the concerns of the developers)
2) don't cleanup unless the operator explicitly requests - ensures we don't lose data, say the operator is backing up every month, but the default is for zk to cleanup every hour (etc...)
I don't see a problem with adding this as long as it's off by default, obv configurable through the zk config file. What sorts of functionality would be provided by this feature?
> automating log and snapshot cleaning
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-1107
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1107
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: server
> Affects Versions: 3.3.3
> Reporter: Jun Rao
>
> I like to have ZK itself manage the amount of snapshots and logs kept, instead of relying on the PurgeTxnLog utility.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira