You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Dain Sundstrom <ds...@gluecode.com> on 2005/03/01 22:07:47 UTC

Re: mx4j 3.0.1 upgrade [svn commit: r155800]

On Mar 1, 2005, at 8:53 AM, jboynes@apache.org wrote:

> ======================================================================= 
> =======
> --- geronimo/trunk/applications/demo/project.xml (original)
> +++ geronimo/trunk/applications/demo/project.xml Tue Mar  1 08:53:09  
> 2005
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
>
>          <dependency>
>              <groupId>mx4j</groupId>
> -            <artifactId>mx4j-jmx</artifactId>
> +            <artifactId>mx4j</artifactId>
>              <version>${mx4j_version}</version>
>              <url>http://mx4j.sourceforge.net</url>
>          </dependency>

Quick qustion: Should now we always, use the "mx4j" artifactId and  
specifically never use "mx4j-jmx"?  Is there a difference between these  
two archives or are they just pseudonyms?


-dain